Search: depreciation

12 results for “depreciation”+ Unexplained Moneyclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 153A21 Section 143(2)14 Section 143(3)8 Section 1327 Section 139(4)7 Section 143(1)7 Section 132(4)7 Section 647 Addition to Income4 Cash Deposit

QUADISIYYA HAJJ CELL,KOLLAM vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3, KOLLAM

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 578/COCH/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin28 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Keshav Dubeyassessmentyear: 2017-18 Quadisiyya Hajj Cell Quadisiyya Complex Thazhuthala Ito Vs. Mukathala Po Ward-3 Kollam 691 577 Kollam Pan No :Aaafq3277H Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri R. Krishnan, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, D.R

Section 142(1)Section 144Section 250Section 69A

unexplained money from undisclosed sources of the partnership firm as provided in section 69A of the Act. 3.1 Aggrieved by the assessment completed u/s 144 of the Act, the assessee has preferred an appeal before ld. CIT(A). 3.2 The ld. CIT(A) also dismissed the appeal on the ground that assessee has not furnished explanation/evidences in support of grounds

QUADISIYYA HAJJ CELL,KOLLAM vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3, KOLLAM

QUADISIYYA HAJJ CELL,KOLLAM vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3, KOLLAM

CHENGAZHASSERIL THOMAS KURIAN,KOTTAYAM vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE KOTTAYAM, KOTTAYAM

V D DEVASIA,KOTTAYAM vs. ACIT, KOTTAYAM

CHENGAZHASSERIL THOMAS KURIAN,KOTTAYAM vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE KOTTAYAM, KOTTAYAM

V D DEVASIA,KOTTAYAM vs. ACIT, KOTTAYAM

V D DEVASIA,KOTTAYAM vs. ACIT, KOTTAYAM

CHENGAZHASSERIL THOMAS KURIAN,KOTTAYAM vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE KOTTAYAM, KOTTAYAM

V D DEVASIA,KOTTAYAM vs. ACIT, KOTTAYAM

THE DCIT, COCHIN vs. M/S.FRIDGEHOUSE RETAIL P. LTD, COCHIN

M/S.C&R HOTELS PVT. LTD,FORT KOCHI vs. THE DCIT,CORP CIR(1)(1), KOCHI

SRI.K.P. JOHNY,THRISSUR vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1), THRISSUR

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1), THRISSUR vs. SRI.K.P. JOHNY, THRISSUR