BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

35 results for “depreciation”+ Section 56(2)(x)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai584Delhi480Bangalore189Ahmedabad163Chandigarh80Jaipur75Kolkata73Chennai67Raipur41Pune36Cochin35Hyderabad33Indore27Guwahati26Lucknow21Visakhapatnam17Rajkot17Karnataka10Surat10Amritsar9SC8Agra6Ranchi6Cuttack4Allahabad4Nagpur4Jodhpur3Telangana2A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Patna1Calcutta1Dehradun1

Key Topics

Addition to Income28Section 14812Section 10A9Section 143(3)8Section 80G5Depreciation5Section 56(2)(ii)4Section 144C(5)4Section 404Deduction

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE ACIT,CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 213/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

x 10,40,400)] and not Rs 1,57,62,060/- assessed in the hands of Gracy Babu. The Ld. AR submitted that while holding that Rs 10,40,470/- out of Rs.25,40,470/- received as sale consideration of rubber estate per acre formed part of consideration in lieu of relinquishment of trusteeship, the assessing officer

MRS.GRACY BABU,ADOOR P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 210/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

x 10,40,400)] and not Rs 1,57,62,060/- assessed in the hands of Gracy Babu. The Ld. AR submitted that while holding that Rs 10,40,470/- out of Rs.25,40,470/- received as sale consideration of rubber estate per acre formed part of consideration in lieu of relinquishment of trusteeship, the assessing officer

Showing 1–20 of 35 · Page 1 of 2

4
Disallowance4
Section 1473

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT,CEN- CIRCLE,, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 309/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

x 10,40,400)] and not Rs 1,57,62,060/- assessed in the hands of Gracy Babu. The Ld. AR submitted that while holding that Rs 10,40,470/- out of Rs.25,40,470/- received as sale consideration of rubber estate per acre formed part of consideration in lieu of relinquishment of trusteeship, the assessing officer

THE ACIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM vs. SMT.GRACY BABU, ADOOR P.O.

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 239/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

x 10,40,400)] and not Rs 1,57,62,060/- assessed in the hands of Gracy Babu. The Ld. AR submitted that while holding that Rs 10,40,470/- out of Rs.25,40,470/- received as sale consideration of rubber estate per acre formed part of consideration in lieu of relinquishment of trusteeship, the assessing officer

SMT.GRACY BABU,ADOOR P.O. vs. THE DCIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 34/COCH/2019[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

x 10,40,400)] and not Rs 1,57,62,060/- assessed in the hands of Gracy Babu. The Ld. AR submitted that while holding that Rs 10,40,470/- out of Rs.25,40,470/- received as sale consideration of rubber estate per acre formed part of consideration in lieu of relinquishment of trusteeship, the assessing officer

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 304/COCH/2019[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

x 10,40,400)] and not Rs 1,57,62,060/- assessed in the hands of Gracy Babu. The Ld. AR submitted that while holding that Rs 10,40,470/- out of Rs.25,40,470/- received as sale consideration of rubber estate per acre formed part of consideration in lieu of relinquishment of trusteeship, the assessing officer

SMT.GRACY BABU,ADOOR P.O. vs. THE DCIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 33/COCH/2019[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

x 10,40,400)] and not Rs 1,57,62,060/- assessed in the hands of Gracy Babu. The Ld. AR submitted that while holding that Rs 10,40,470/- out of Rs.25,40,470/- received as sale consideration of rubber estate per acre formed part of consideration in lieu of relinquishment of trusteeship, the assessing officer

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 29/COCH/2019[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

x 10,40,400)] and not Rs 1,57,62,060/- assessed in the hands of Gracy Babu. The Ld. AR submitted that while holding that Rs 10,40,470/- out of Rs.25,40,470/- received as sale consideration of rubber estate per acre formed part of consideration in lieu of relinquishment of trusteeship, the assessing officer

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT,CEN- CIRCLE,, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 306/COCH/2019[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

x 10,40,400)] and not Rs 1,57,62,060/- assessed in the hands of Gracy Babu. The Ld. AR submitted that while holding that Rs 10,40,470/- out of Rs.25,40,470/- received as sale consideration of rubber estate per acre formed part of consideration in lieu of relinquishment of trusteeship, the assessing officer

THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM vs. SRI.JOSE THOMAS, ADOOR

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 238/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

x 10,40,400)] and not Rs 1,57,62,060/- assessed in the hands of Gracy Babu. The Ld. AR submitted that while holding that Rs 10,40,470/- out of Rs.25,40,470/- received as sale consideration of rubber estate per acre formed part of consideration in lieu of relinquishment of trusteeship, the assessing officer

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT,CEN- CIRCLE,, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 310/COCH/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

x 10,40,400)] and not Rs 1,57,62,060/- assessed in the hands of Gracy Babu. The Ld. AR submitted that while holding that Rs 10,40,470/- out of Rs.25,40,470/- received as sale consideration of rubber estate per acre formed part of consideration in lieu of relinquishment of trusteeship, the assessing officer

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT,CEN- CIRCLE,, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 305/COCH/2019[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

x 10,40,400)] and not Rs 1,57,62,060/- assessed in the hands of Gracy Babu. The Ld. AR submitted that while holding that Rs 10,40,470/- out of Rs.25,40,470/- received as sale consideration of rubber estate per acre formed part of consideration in lieu of relinquishment of trusteeship, the assessing officer

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 28/COCH/2019[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

x 10,40,400)] and not Rs 1,57,62,060/- assessed in the hands of Gracy Babu. The Ld. AR submitted that while holding that Rs 10,40,470/- out of Rs.25,40,470/- received as sale consideration of rubber estate per acre formed part of consideration in lieu of relinquishment of trusteeship, the assessing officer

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT,CEN- CIRCLE,, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 308/COCH/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

x 10,40,400)] and not Rs 1,57,62,060/- assessed in the hands of Gracy Babu. The Ld. AR submitted that while holding that Rs 10,40,470/- out of Rs.25,40,470/- received as sale consideration of rubber estate per acre formed part of consideration in lieu of relinquishment of trusteeship, the assessing officer

SMT.GRACY BABU,ADOOR P.O. vs. THE DCIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 35/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

x 10,40,400)] and not Rs 1,57,62,060/- assessed in the hands of Gracy Babu. The Ld. AR submitted that while holding that Rs 10,40,470/- out of Rs.25,40,470/- received as sale consideration of rubber estate per acre formed part of consideration in lieu of relinquishment of trusteeship, the assessing officer

THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM vs. SRI.JOSE THOMAS, ADOOR

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 55/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

x 10,40,400)] and not Rs 1,57,62,060/- assessed in the hands of Gracy Babu. The Ld. AR submitted that while holding that Rs 10,40,470/- out of Rs.25,40,470/- received as sale consideration of rubber estate per acre formed part of consideration in lieu of relinquishment of trusteeship, the assessing officer

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 30/COCH/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

x 10,40,400)] and not Rs 1,57,62,060/- assessed in the hands of Gracy Babu. The Ld. AR submitted that while holding that Rs 10,40,470/- out of Rs.25,40,470/- received as sale consideration of rubber estate per acre formed part of consideration in lieu of relinquishment of trusteeship, the assessing officer

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 31/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

x 10,40,400)] and not Rs 1,57,62,060/- assessed in the hands of Gracy Babu. The Ld. AR submitted that while holding that Rs 10,40,470/- out of Rs.25,40,470/- received as sale consideration of rubber estate per acre formed part of consideration in lieu of relinquishment of trusteeship, the assessing officer

THE DCIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM vs. SMT.GRACY BABU, ADOOR P.O.

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 54/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

x 10,40,400)] and not Rs 1,57,62,060/- assessed in the hands of Gracy Babu. The Ld. AR submitted that while holding that Rs 10,40,470/- out of Rs.25,40,470/- received as sale consideration of rubber estate per acre formed part of consideration in lieu of relinquishment of trusteeship, the assessing officer

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 27/COCH/2019[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

x 10,40,400)] and not Rs 1,57,62,060/- assessed in the hands of Gracy Babu. The Ld. AR submitted that while holding that Rs 10,40,470/- out of Rs.25,40,470/- received as sale consideration of rubber estate per acre formed part of consideration in lieu of relinquishment of trusteeship, the assessing officer