BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “depreciation”+ Section 50Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai67Delhi23Raipur17Bangalore14Chennai13Cochin6Ahmedabad6Kolkata6Amritsar5Hyderabad3Pune2Visakhapatnam1Karnataka1SC1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1

Key Topics

Section 50B9Section 50B(1)4Depreciation4Section 23Section 194C3Section 653Capital Gains3Long Term Capital Gains3Short Term Capital Gains3TDS

ACEELERATED FREEZE DRYING CO.LTD,ALAPPUZHA vs. DCIT, ALAPPUZHA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is allowed and the appeal of the

ITA 1286/COCH/2005[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin28 Jun 2019AY 2002-03

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 2Section 2(14)Section 42Section 50BSection 50B(1)

depreciable assets under Section 50.of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer noticed that the sale is a "slump sale" falling within the definition of Section 2(42C) of the Act and he made the assessment for capital gain as provided under Section 50B

DCIT, ALAPPUZHA vs. M/S ACEELERATED FREEZE DRYING CO, LTD, ALAPPUZHA

3
Section 2(14)2
Section 143(3)2

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is allowed and the appeal of the

ITA 714/COCH/2008[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin28 Jun 2019AY 2002-03

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 2Section 2(14)Section 42Section 50BSection 50B(1)

depreciable assets under Section 50.of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer noticed that the sale is a "slump sale" falling within the definition of Section 2(42C) of the Act and he made the assessment for capital gain as provided under Section 50B

M/S.AMALGAM FOODS LTD,KOCHI vs. THE DCIT, CIR-1, ALLEPPEY, ALLEPPEY

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 110/COCH/2018[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin09 Apr 2019AY 2003-04

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 2Section 43BSection 50(2)Section 50B

section 50B of the Act. Accordingly, the CIT(A) confirmed the assessment of profits on sale of the sea food business as long term capital gain u/s. 50B of the Act. 6. Against this, the assessee is in appeal before us. The Ld. AR submitted that what has been sold represented depreciable

USHA JOHNSON,KOLLAM vs. ITO, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 751/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin28 Feb 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri George George K., Jm

Section 194CSection 65

depreciation to 15%. 5. Aggrieved by the orders of the CIT(A), the assessee has filed these appeals before the Tribunal. Identical grounds have been raised for all the assessment years. The assessee has filed a brief written submission which reads as follows: “The learned appellate authority has failed to appreciate the exact nature of the business

USHA JOHNSON,KOLLAM vs. ITO, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 750/COCH/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin28 Feb 2020AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri George George K., Jm

Section 194CSection 65

depreciation to 15%. 5. Aggrieved by the orders of the CIT(A), the assessee has filed these appeals before the Tribunal. Identical grounds have been raised for all the assessment years. The assessee has filed a brief written submission which reads as follows: “The learned appellate authority has failed to appreciate the exact nature of the business

USHA JOHNSON,KOLLAM vs. ITO, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 752/COCH/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin28 Feb 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri George George K., Jm

Section 194CSection 65

depreciation to 15%. 5. Aggrieved by the orders of the CIT(A), the assessee has filed these appeals before the Tribunal. Identical grounds have been raised for all the assessment years. The assessee has filed a brief written submission which reads as follows: “The learned appellate authority has failed to appreciate the exact nature of the business