BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

11 results for “depreciation”+ Section 36(1)(viia)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai164Chennai72Bangalore71Delhi47Chandigarh44Pune22Kolkata19Surat18Hyderabad17Visakhapatnam15Karnataka12Cochin11Jaipur9Jodhpur8Amritsar8Ahmedabad8Rajkot4Telangana3Indore3Nagpur3Allahabad2Kerala2Cuttack2Patna2SC2Raipur1Lucknow1

Key Topics

Section 36(1)(viia)19Section 36(1)15Section 15414Section 220(2)12Section 244A12Section 2507Rectification u/s 1547Section 234D6Section 244a6Deduction

M/S.SOUTH MALABAR GRAMIN BANK ( PRESENTLY- KERALA GRAMIN BANK),MALAPPURAM vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE_2(2), TIRUR, TIRUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 363/COCH/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Jan 2020AY 2008-09

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(viia)

viia) of the Act. I.T.A. No. 363, 364&366/Coch/2017 10. Against this, the assessee is in appeal before us. The Ld. AR submitted that the provision made for bad and doubtful debts are written back and offered for taxation while computing income for liability. Hence, balance in provision account for taxation purposes will be nil, though as per books

M/S.SOUTH MALABAR GRAMINA BANK,MALAPPURAM vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-2(2), TIRUR, THE ACIT, CIRCLE-2(2), TIRUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 364/COCH/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin
5
Disallowance3
14 Jan 2020
AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(viia)

viia) of the Act. I.T.A. No. 363, 364&366/Coch/2017 10. Against this, the assessee is in appeal before us. The Ld. AR submitted that the provision made for bad and doubtful debts are written back and offered for taxation while computing income for liability. Hence, balance in provision account for taxation purposes will be nil, though as per books

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-2(2), TIRUR, TIRUR vs. M/S. SOUTH MALABAR GRAMINA BANK H.O., MALAPPURAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 366/COCH/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Jan 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(viia)

viia) of the Act. I.T.A. No. 363, 364&366/Coch/2017 10. Against this, the assessee is in appeal before us. The Ld. AR submitted that the provision made for bad and doubtful debts are written back and offered for taxation while computing income for liability. Hence, balance in provision account for taxation purposes will be nil, though as per books

THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LIMITED,THRISSUR vs. JCIT, CIRCLE-1(1), THRISSUR

Appeal is allowed

ITA 233/COCH/2024[2006-2007]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin23 Oct 2024AY 2006-2007

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Shri Naresh S., CAFor Respondent: Dr. S. Pandian, CIT-DR
Section 153Section 154Section 220(2)Section 234DSection 244ASection 244aSection 250

viia) based on population of village instead of population of ward. The South Indian Bank Ltd. 6. Without prejudice to the above, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, based on the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Vijaya Bank (323 ITR 166), since the provision made is reduced from advances in the Balance

THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LIMITED,THRISSUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 1(1)& TPS, THRISSUR

Appeal is allowed

ITA 286/COCH/2024[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin23 Oct 2024AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Shri Naresh S., CAFor Respondent: Dr. S. Pandian, CIT-DR
Section 153Section 154Section 220(2)Section 234DSection 244ASection 244aSection 250

viia) based on population of village instead of population of ward. The South Indian Bank Ltd. 6. Without prejudice to the above, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, based on the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Vijaya Bank (323 ITR 166), since the provision made is reduced from advances in the Balance

THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LIMITED,THRISSUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1), THRISSUR

Appeal is allowed

ITA 232/COCH/2024[2004-2005]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin23 Oct 2024AY 2004-2005

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Shri Naresh S., CAFor Respondent: Dr. S. Pandian, CIT-DR
Section 153Section 154Section 220(2)Section 234DSection 244ASection 244aSection 250

viia) based on population of village instead of population of ward. The South Indian Bank Ltd. 6. Without prejudice to the above, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, based on the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Vijaya Bank (323 ITR 166), since the provision made is reduced from advances in the Balance

THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LIMITED ,THRISSUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 1(1), THRISSUR

Appeal is allowed

ITA 285/COCH/2024[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin23 Oct 2024AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Shri Naresh S., CAFor Respondent: Dr. S. Pandian, CIT-DR
Section 153Section 154Section 220(2)Section 234DSection 244ASection 244aSection 250

viia) based on population of village instead of population of ward. The South Indian Bank Ltd. 6. Without prejudice to the above, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, based on the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Vijaya Bank (323 ITR 166), since the provision made is reduced from advances in the Balance

THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LIMITED,THRISSUR vs. DCIT, THRISSUR

Appeal is allowed

ITA 288/COCH/2024[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin23 Oct 2024AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Shri Naresh S., CAFor Respondent: Dr. S. Pandian, CIT-DR
Section 153Section 154Section 220(2)Section 234DSection 244ASection 244aSection 250

viia) based on population of village instead of population of ward. The South Indian Bank Ltd. 6. Without prejudice to the above, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, based on the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Vijaya Bank (323 ITR 166), since the provision made is reduced from advances in the Balance

THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LIMITED,THRISSUR vs. JCIT, RANGE-1, THRISSUR

Appeal is allowed

ITA 283/COCH/2024[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin23 Oct 2024AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Shri Naresh S., CAFor Respondent: Dr. S. Pandian, CIT-DR
Section 153Section 154Section 220(2)Section 234DSection 244ASection 244aSection 250

viia) based on population of village instead of population of ward. The South Indian Bank Ltd. 6. Without prejudice to the above, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, based on the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Vijaya Bank (323 ITR 166), since the provision made is reduced from advances in the Balance

THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LIMITED,THRISSUR vs. PCIT, , THRISSUR

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is allowed

ITA 628/COCH/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 May 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Raoshri Sandeep Singh Karhailthe South Indian Bank Limited, Head Office, Mission Quarters, Tb Road, Thrissur Kerala - 680001 ............... Appellant Pan : Aabct0022F V/S Pcit, Aayakar Bhavan, North Block, ……………… Respondent New Annex Building Mananchira, Kozhikode Kerala.

For Appellant: Shri Naresh C, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 142(1)Section 143Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 250Section 263Section 36(1)(vii)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 36(2)(v)

depreciation on investments, the submission made and attached documents filed were seen. After consideration of the matter, it is seen that setting aside of the assessment on those issues is not called for.” 7. On 14/02/2024, the learned PCIT issued notice under section 154 of the Act on the basis that vide revision order passed under section

AROOR CO-OP URBAN SOCIETY LTD,KOZHIKKODE vs. ITO, KOZHIKKODE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 188/COCH/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 Jun 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shrigeorge George K.And Shrilaxmi Prasad Sahuaroor Co-Operative Urbn Society Dcit, Central Prossing Centre Aroor P.O., Kakkattil 673507 Bangalore Vs.

For Appellant: Shri V.S. Narayanan, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 143Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 80P

36(1)(viia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961? ................... .................. 19. Section 80A(5) provides that where the assessee fails to make a claim in his return of income for any deduction, inter alia, under any provision of Chapter VIA under the heading "C.-Deductions in respect of certain incomes", no deduction shall be allowed to him thereunder. Therefore, in cases