QUADISIYYA HAJJ CELL,KOLLAM vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3, KOLLAM
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 578/COCH/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin28 Jan 2025AY 2017-18
Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Keshav Dubeyassessmentyear: 2017-18 Quadisiyya Hajj Cell Quadisiyya Complex Thazhuthala Ito Vs. Mukathala Po Ward-3 Kollam 691 577 Kollam Pan No :Aaafq3277H Appellant Respondent
For Appellant: Shri R. Krishnan, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, D.R
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 250Section 69A
cash deposited in the bank accounts amounting to Rs.3,35,25,792/-, the ld. CIT(A) concluded that the assessee failed to discharge the onus and therefore, he did not find any reason to interfere with the findings/observation of the AO made in the assessment order and accordingly addition of Rs.3,35,25,792/- made by AO was
ITANo. 578/Coch/2023
