BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

283 results for “depreciation”+ Business Incomeclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai5,415Delhi4,677Chennai1,933Bangalore1,752Kolkata1,233Ahmedabad1,146Pune709Hyderabad581Jaipur503Chandigarh358Cochin283Karnataka271Visakhapatnam221Indore209Raipur207Surat205Cuttack178Amritsar129Rajkot109Lucknow87SC76Nagpur73Ranchi68Jodhpur66Guwahati66Telangana61Patna38Agra36Panaji36Dehradun31Kerala29Allahabad23Calcutta21Jabalpur12Punjab & Haryana10Varanasi10Orissa4Rajasthan4Gauhati2S. B. SINHA MARKANDEY KATJU1Himachal Pradesh1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Tripura1

Key Topics

Addition to Income67Section 143(3)61Disallowance42Depreciation41Deduction35Section 32(1)(iia)33Section 26332Section 80I29Section 153A18Section 32(1)(ii)

THE ACIT, COCHIN vs. M/S.PTL ENTERPRISES LTD, COCHIN

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 84/COCH/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin06 Jul 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Mritunjaya Sharma, CIT-DRFor Respondent: S/Sri.Joseph Marcose, Sr.Advocate &
Section 56(2)(ii)

business carried on by the appellant company. Our above conclusion is also fortified from the approach adopted by the Assessing Officer whereby out of expenditure claimed of Rs.18.77 crores, he has allowed expenditure of Rs.2.59 crores under the following heads: Sl. Particulars Amount claimed as Allowed by No. per computation of Assessing Officer income (Rs.) (Rs. In lacs) I EMPLOYEES

THE ACIT, COCHIN vs. M/S.PTL ENTERPRISES LTD, COCHIN

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

Showing 1–20 of 283 · Page 1 of 15

...
16
Section 10A16
Section 15414
ITA 162/COCH/2017[2013-14]Status: Disposed
ITAT Cochin
06 May 2019
AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Alok MitraFor Respondent: Sri.Abraham Joseph Markose
Section 56(2)(ii)

business carried on by the appellant company. Our above conclusion is also fortified from the approach adopted by the Assessing Officer whereby out of expenditure claimed of Rs.18.77 crores, he has allowed expenditure of Rs.2.59 crores under the following heads: Sl. Particulars Amount claimed as Allowed by No. per computation of Assessing Officer income (Rs.) (Rs. In lacs) I EMPLOYEES

THE ACIT, COCHIN vs. M/S.PTL ENTERPRISES LTD, COCHIN

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 161/COCH/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin06 May 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Alok MitraFor Respondent: Sri.Abraham Joseph Markose
Section 56(2)(ii)

business carried on by the appellant company. Our above conclusion is also fortified from the approach adopted by the Assessing Officer whereby out of expenditure claimed of Rs.18.77 crores, he has allowed expenditure of Rs.2.59 crores under the following heads: Sl. Particulars Amount claimed as Allowed by No. per computation of Assessing Officer income (Rs.) (Rs. In lacs) I EMPLOYEES

THE ACIT, COCHIN vs. M/S.PTL ENTERPRISES LTD, COCHIN

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 160/COCH/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin06 May 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Alok MitraFor Respondent: Sri.Abraham Joseph Markose
Section 56(2)(ii)

business carried on by the appellant company. Our above conclusion is also fortified from the approach adopted by the Assessing Officer whereby out of expenditure claimed of Rs.18.77 crores, he has allowed expenditure of Rs.2.59 crores under the following heads: Sl. Particulars Amount claimed as Allowed by No. per computation of Assessing Officer income (Rs.) (Rs. In lacs) I EMPLOYEES

BHIMA JEWELLERS,SULTHAN BATHERY, WAYANAD vs. THE PR CIT, KOZHIKKODE, KOZHIKKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 208/COCH/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 Aug 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm I.T.A. No.208/Coch/2018 Assessment Year : 2013-14 M/S. Bhima Jewellers, Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income- 6/785 Ai, Tax, Kozhikode. Mysore Road, Chungum Junction, Sulthan Bathery, Wayanad-673 592. [Pan: Aakfb 9817C] (Assessee-Appellant) (Revenue-Respondent) Revenue By Shri Dhanaraj A. Sr. Dr Assessee By Shri R. Krishnan, Ca Date Of Hearing 05/07/2018 Date Of Pronouncement 20/08/2018

Section 115BSection 14Section 143(3)Section 263Section 68Section 69Section 69ASection 69BSection 69CSection 69D

depreciation against the unexplained income in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Act. On appeal: Held, allowing the appeal, that the income had been treated as unexplained cash credit under section 68. Once it was so done for the purpose of set off or any other purpose, the unexplained income could not 7 be treated as business

MR.P.C.JOSE,,COCHIN vs. DCIT, COCHIN

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is dismissed, and the Revenue’s appeal is partly allowed and partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 54/COCH/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin23 Apr 2024AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Dasp.C. Jose Deputy Commissioner Of Prop. Brothers Agencies Income Tax, Circle-2(1) Jews Street Vs. Kochi Ernakulam 682031 [Pan: Abbpj8250F] (Appellant) (Respondent) Deputy Commissioner Of P.C. Jose Income Tax, Circle-2(1) Prop. Brothers Agencies Kochi Vs. Jews Street Ernakulam 682031 [Pan: Abbpj8250F] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: ----- None -----For Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)

business. This was as there was no closing stock as on 31.03.2007, i.e., prior to the beginning of the relevant previous year, nor any purchase and, thus, sale during the current year. The expenditure of Rs.7,48,388 toward depreciation and administration expenditure, therefore, could not be allowed. The income

THE ACIT, CORP CIRCLE-1(2), KOCHI vs. M/S.KNOWELL REALTORS INDIA P. LTD, KOCHI

In the result, the Revenue’s appeals are allowed

ITA 192/COCH/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin25 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am &Shri Manomohan Das, Jm

For Appellant: Sri. Santosh P. Abraham, AdvFor Respondent: Smt.J.M.Jamuna Devi, Sr.DR
Section 143(3)Section 268A

business income. In fact, it not claiming depreciation on it’s buildings is also consistent with the property yielding revenue

THE ACIT, CORP CIRCLE-1(2), KOCHI vs. M/S.KNOWELL REALTORS INDIA P. LTD, KOCHI

In the result, the Revenue’s appeals are allowed

ITA 193/COCH/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin25 Sept 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am &Shri Manomohan Das, Jm

For Appellant: Sri. Santosh P. Abraham, AdvFor Respondent: Smt.J.M.Jamuna Devi, Sr.DR
Section 143(3)Section 268A

business income. In fact, it not claiming depreciation on it’s buildings is also consistent with the property yielding revenue

M/S.COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD,COCHIN vs. THE ADCIT, COCHIN

In the result, appeals of the Revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 310/COCH/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin21 Nov 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 80I

business’ as offered by the assessee. 10.2. We have heard rival submissions and perused the material on record. The High Court vide judgment in assessee’s own case in ITA No. 163, 169 & 176/2012 dated 07/08/2017 for the AYs 2005-06, 2006-07 & 2007-08, held that as per Section 2(b) of "The Airports Authority of India

COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD,COCHIN vs. THE DCIT, COCHIN

In the result, appeals of the Revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 344/COCH/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin21 Nov 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 80I

business’ as offered by the assessee. 10.2. We have heard rival submissions and perused the material on record. The High Court vide judgment in assessee’s own case in ITA No. 163, 169 & 176/2012 dated 07/08/2017 for the AYs 2005-06, 2006-07 & 2007-08, held that as per Section 2(b) of "The Airports Authority of India

THE DCIT, COCHIN vs. M.S COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD, COCHIN

In the result, appeals of the Revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 190/COCH/2017[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin21 Nov 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 80I

business’ as offered by the assessee. 10.2. We have heard rival submissions and perused the material on record. The High Court vide judgment in assessee’s own case in ITA No. 163, 169 & 176/2012 dated 07/08/2017 for the AYs 2005-06, 2006-07 & 2007-08, held that as per Section 2(b) of "The Airports Authority of India

ASPINWALL & COMPANY LTD,COCHIN vs. THE ACIT, COCHIN

In the result,the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 60/COCH/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin19 May 2020AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

Section 14A

business; A condition subsequent, the fulfilment of which may result in the reduction or even extinction of the liability, would not have the effect of converting that liability into a contingent liability; 11.2 Further, the Ld. AR relied on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Calcutta Co. Ltd. v. CIT (37 ITR1) wherein it was held

ASPINWALL & COMPANY LTD,COCHIN vs. THE ACIT, COCHIN

In the result,the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 61/COCH/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin19 May 2020AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

Section 14A

business; A condition subsequent, the fulfilment of which may result in the reduction or even extinction of the liability, would not have the effect of converting that liability into a contingent liability; 11.2 Further, the Ld. AR relied on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Calcutta Co. Ltd. v. CIT (37 ITR1) wherein it was held

M/S ASPINWALL & CO.,LTD,COCHIN vs. THE ACIT, COCHIN

In the result,the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 128/COCH/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin19 May 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

Section 14A

business; A condition subsequent, the fulfilment of which may result in the reduction or even extinction of the liability, would not have the effect of converting that liability into a contingent liability; 11.2 Further, the Ld. AR relied on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Calcutta Co. Ltd. v. CIT (37 ITR1) wherein it was held

THE DCIT, COCHIN vs. M/S.ASPINWALL & CO. LTD, COCHIN

In the result,the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 133/COCH/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin19 May 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

Section 14A

business; A condition subsequent, the fulfilment of which may result in the reduction or even extinction of the liability, would not have the effect of converting that liability into a contingent liability; 11.2 Further, the Ld. AR relied on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Calcutta Co. Ltd. v. CIT (37 ITR1) wherein it was held

INFOPARKS KERALA,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE JT DIRECTOR OF IT (OSD) EXEM), COCHIN

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are partly allowed

ITA 76/COCH/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin11 Aug 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am & Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm

For Appellant: Sri. Rajakannan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr.AR
Section 11Section 11(1)Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 2(15)

depreciation, sustain that existing. Further, we may clarify that this business is not a property held under trust, but one carried on the basis or by virtue of such property, being, for instance, 80 acres of land transferred from KINFRA; the capital infusion by GoI and GoK, etc. The income

INFOPARKS KERALA,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE JT DIRECTOR OF IT (OSD) EXEM), COCHIN

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are partly allowed

ITA 75/COCH/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin11 Aug 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am & Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm

For Appellant: Sri. Rajakannan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr.AR
Section 11Section 11(1)Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 2(15)

depreciation, sustain that existing. Further, we may clarify that this business is not a property held under trust, but one carried on the basis or by virtue of such property, being, for instance, 80 acres of land transferred from KINFRA; the capital infusion by GoI and GoK, etc. The income

INFOPARKS KERALA,COCHIN vs. THE ACIT, COCHIN

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are partly allowed

ITA 77/COCH/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin11 Aug 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am & Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm

For Appellant: Sri. Rajakannan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr.AR
Section 11Section 11(1)Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 2(15)

depreciation, sustain that existing. Further, we may clarify that this business is not a property held under trust, but one carried on the basis or by virtue of such property, being, for instance, 80 acres of land transferred from KINFRA; the capital infusion by GoI and GoK, etc. The income

M/S.MUTHOOTT MINI FINANCIERS P. LTD,KOZHENCHERRY vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE-2,, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical

ITA 279/COCH/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin19 May 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 14ASection 32

business. For the assessment year 2012-13, the assessee declared income from letting out property under the head income from house property. However, in all these years, the Assessing Officer disallowed depreciation

M/S.MUTHOOTT MINI FINANCIERS P. LTD,KOZHENCHERRY vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE-2,, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical

ITA 278/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin19 May 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 14ASection 32

business. For the assessment year 2012-13, the assessee declared income from letting out property under the head income from house property. However, in all these years, the Assessing Officer disallowed depreciation