BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 80Gclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai217Pune212Chennai207Ahmedabad205Jaipur145Kolkata107Delhi99Bangalore69Hyderabad54Surat39Chandigarh25Lucknow24Nagpur22Indore15Rajkot14Amritsar14Visakhapatnam8Agra7Jabalpur6Jodhpur6Panaji5Raipur4Cuttack4Allahabad3Cochin3Ranchi3Calcutta3SC2Guwahati2Varanasi1R.M. LODHA ANIL R. DAVE1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 80G16Section 80G(5)8Exemption3Section 802Section 12A2Charitable Trust2

SRI BHUVANENDRA EDUCATION TRUST,KANHANGAD vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 352/COCH/2024[2024-2025]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 Sept 2024AY 2024-2025

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K.Sri Bhuvanendra Education Trust Cit (Exemption) 2Nd/686, Gajanana Aayakar Bhaval Opp. Head Post Office Vs. Old Rly Station Road Hosdurg, Kanhangad 671315 Ernakulam 682018 [Pan: Aakts8046E] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri K. Suresh Kumar Varma, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 5Section 80Section 80GSection 80G(5)

section 80 G of the Act. 17. Therefore, in this ambiguity situation in circular No. 8/2022 of CBDT dated 31-3-2022 and latest Circular No. 6/2023 dated 24-5-2023, of the CBDT, we do not have any option but to condone the delay in filing application in Form No. 10AB, u/s 80G

GAJANANA CHARITABLE TRUST,KANHANGAD vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 354/COCH/2024[2024-2025]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 Sept 2024AY 2024-2025

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K.Gajanana Charitable Trust Cit (Exemption) 2Nd/686, Gajanana Aayakar Bhaval Opp. Head Post Office Vs. Old Rly Station Road Hosdurg, Kanhangad 671315 Ernakulam 682018 [Pan: Aabtg6555F] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri K. Suresh Kumar Varma, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 80Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iv)

section 80 G of the Act. 17. Therefore, in this ambiguity situation in circular No. 8/2022 of CBDT dated 31-3-2022 and latest Circular No. 6/2023 dated 24-5-2023, of the CBDT, we do not have any option but to condone the delay in filing application in Form No. 10AB, u/s 80G

SPIA CHARITABLE TRUST,KOTTAYAM vs. CIT(E), KOCHI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 650/COCH/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Apr 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri George George K., Vp & Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am Assessment Year: 2024-25 Spia Charitable Trust .......... Appellant Building No. Xiv/195A, Kottayam Municipality, Kodimatha Old Mc Road Kottayam 6860013 [Pan: Aawts4128H] Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption) .......... Respondent Aayakar Bhavan, Old Railway Sation Road Ernakulam 682018 Appellant By: Shri Jacob Baboo, Ca Respondent By: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 01.04.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 08.04.2025

For Appellant: Shri Jacob Baboo, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 12ASection 80G

section 80G of the Act in Form 10AB on 01.01.2023. The said application came to be rejected vide order dated 29.05.2024 on the ground that the appellant failed to offer explanation to the show cause notice dated 03.04.2024. 3. Being aggrieved, the appellant is in appeal before us in the present appeal. 4. At the outset we find that there