Search: condonation of delay

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 69Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai28 Jaipur21 Surat21 Chennai17 Delhi16 Chandigarh14 Rajkot12 Kolkata11 Bangalore11 Hyderabad11 Pune8 Ahmedabad7 Dehradun6 Visakhapatnam3 Guwahati3 Indore2 SC2 Cochin2 Amritsar2 Lucknow1 Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 115B12 Section 2638 Section 688 Section 3(1)(b)2 Unexplained Cash Credit2 Unexplained Investment2 Survey u/s 133A2 Limitation/Time-bar2

SRI.P.V.RAVINDRAN,KANNUR vs. THE ITO, KANNUR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 302/COCH/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Shri T.M. Sreedharan, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Shantam Bose, CIT DR

Section 115BSection 263Section 3(1)(b)Section 68

delay in filing the present appeal stands condoned. 2.4 Considering the above submissions, the appeal is not held to be time barred respectfully following the orders passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court (supra). Accordingly the present appeal is admitted to be adjudicated on the issues raised by assessee there. Page 4 ITA Nos. 302 & 303/Coch/2020 3. Following additional grounds filed

SRI.P.V.RAVINDRAN,KANNUR vs. THE ITO, KANNUR

SRI.P.V.RAVINDRAN,KANNUR vs. THE ITO, KANNUR

SHRI.P.V. RAVEENDRAN,KANNUR vs. THE ITO, KANNUR