Search: condonation of delay

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 54Fclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 10A7 Section 54F7 Section 139(4)4 Deduction3 Section 2502 Section 143(3)2 Section 139(1)2 Addition to Income2 Capital Gains2

SRI. MAMMEN ADENETH PAPPY,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE ITO,, THIRUVALLA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical

ITA 498/COCH/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Apr 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 54F

condone the delay of 38 days in filing the appeal and admit the appeal for adjudication. 5. Now coming to the issue raised by the assessee, the facts are that in the return of income filed, the assessee claimed deduction u/s. 54F of the Act on the capital gain. The Assessing Officer found that the assessee had not utilized

BENEESH KUMAR,KOCHI vs. ITO, NON CORP WARD 1(1), KOCHI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 1161/COCH/2024[2013-14]Status: Disposed

SRI. MAMMEN ADENETH PAPPY,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE ITO,, THIRUVALLA

BENEESH KUMAR,KOCHI vs. ITO, NON CORP WARD 1(1), KOCHI

SRI. MAMMEN ADENETH PAPPY,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE ITO,, THIRUVALLA

BENEESH KUMAR,KOCHI vs. ITO, NON CORP WARD 1(1), KOCHI

NAICO INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,KERALA vs. CORPORATE CIR 2(1), KOCHI