PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE KUNNAMANGALAM,KOZHIKODE vs. ITO, WARD TDS, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm

Section 5. This aspect of the matter naturally introduces the consideration of all relevant facts and it is at this stage the diligence of the party or its bona fides may fall for consideration.” (emphasis supplied) 23. On the facts remedy of appeal. The averments made in the application seeking condonation of delay in filing appeals do not show

PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE KUNNAMANAGALAM KOZHIKODE,KOZHIKODE vs. ITO,WARD TDS, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm

Section 5. This aspect of the matter naturally introduces the consideration of all relevant facts and it is at this stage the diligence of the party or its bona fides may fall for consideration.” (emphasis supplied) 23. On the facts remedy of appeal. The averments made in the application seeking condonation of delay in filing appeals do not show

PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE KUNNAMANGALAM KOZHIKODE,KOZHIKODE vs. ITO ,WARD TDS, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm

Section 5. This aspect of the matter naturally introduces the consideration of all relevant facts and it is at this stage the diligence of the party or its bona fides may fall for consideration.” (emphasis supplied) 23. On the facts remedy of appeal. The averments made in the application seeking condonation of delay in filing appeals do not show

ACIT,CIRCLE-1(1), TRIVANDRUM vs. KERALA STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORP. LTD, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

condone the delay of 02 days in filing the appeal and admit the appeal for adjudication. 3. The Revenue has raised the following grounds of appeal: 1. The Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Thiruvananthapuram erred in relying on the decision of jurisdictional Tribunal's order in assessee's own case for A Y 2008-09 and in deleting

M/S.KOVILAKAM HOTEL P LTD,THRISSUR vs. THE ACIT,, THRISSUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri George George K.

condone the delay of 27 days in filing the appeal and proceed to dispose off the appeal on merits. 3. The solitary issue that is raised in this appeal is whether the CIT(A) is justified in confirming the action of the Assessing Officer in treating the sum of Rs.60,25,240/- as capital expenditure. 4. Briefly stated, the facts

M/S KOTTAYAM SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,KANNUR vs. ITO WARD 2, KANNUR

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

36 & 37/Coch/2023 for assessment years 2007-08 & 2009-10, arise against the CIT(A), Kozhikode’s common order dated 02.02.2015, passed in case Nos. ITA- 117/KNR/CIT/CLT/2013-14/ITA-118/KNR/CIT/CLT/2013-14 and ITA- 235/KNR/CIT/CLT/2011-12 involving in proceeding u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) . Heard both the parties. Case files perused. 2. It emerges at the outset with the able assistance coming

M/S KOTTAYAM SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,KANNUR vs. ITO WARD 2, KANNUR

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

36 & 37/Coch/2023 for assessment years 2007-08 & 2009-10, arise against the CIT(A), Kozhikode’s common order dated 02.02.2015, passed in case Nos. ITA- 117/KNR/CIT/CLT/2013-14/ITA-118/KNR/CIT/CLT/2013-14 and ITA- 235/KNR/CIT/CLT/2011-12 involving in proceeding u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) . Heard both the parties. Case files perused. 2. It emerges at the outset with the able assistance coming