BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 36(1)(va)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai198Delhi152Kolkata83Chandigarh77Nagpur58Mumbai57Jaipur56Bangalore50Pune43Hyderabad41Ahmedabad32Indore30Surat24Cuttack21Visakhapatnam20Amritsar20Raipur20Lucknow17Jodhpur10Cochin7Varanasi6Allahabad6Guwahati5Rajkot3SC2Patna2Telangana1Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 43B15Section 36(1)(va)14Section 36(1)9Section 139(1)7Deduction6Disallowance6Section 143(1)4Section 363Section 1542Section 2(24)(x)

SRI.PURUSOTHAMAN K.K.,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE ITO, WD-3, , THIRUVALLA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 51/COCH/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin19 Jun 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 154Section 36Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

condone the delay of 79 days in filing the appeal and admit the appeal for adjudication. 3. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: A: The orders of the authorities below in so far as they are against the appellant are opposed to law, facts and circumstances of the case. B: The averments made before the first appellate

2
Condonation of Delay2

M/S KANAKA POLYPACK PRIVATE LIMITED,ALUVA vs. ACIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), KOCHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 876/COCH/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Mar 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri George George K & Ms. Padmavathy Sassessment Year :2018-19 M/S. Kanaka Polypack Private Limited, Acit, Vs. Xvi, Keezhmad Panchayat, Corporate Circle - 1(1), Ashokapuram,Aluva, Kochi – 682 018. Ernakulam District, Kerala – 683 101. Pan :Aafck 1498 J Assessee Respondent

For Appellant: Shri. Manu Kurian, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J M Jamuna Devi, Sr. AR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 154Section 34(1)(iv)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

condone the delay of 12 days in filing the appeal and admit the appeal for adjudication 5. In so far as the question whether the employees contribution to Provident Fund and Employees State Insurance which the employer deducts and pays over to the concerned authorities beyond the date prescribed for payment of such contribution but nevertheless the contribution has been

M/S KERALA STATE CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LTD,TRIVANRUM vs. DCIT, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 699/COCH/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin02 Mar 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 2(24)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

condone the delay of 36 days in filing the appeal and admit the appeal for adjudication. 4. The assessee has raised the following common grounds of appeal except for variation in figures: 1. The learned CIT(A) has erred in confirming disallowance of Employees Contribution to PF/ESI under section 36(1) (va

M/S KERALA STATE CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LTD,TRIVANRUM vs. DCIT, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 698/COCH/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin02 Mar 2020AY 2007-08

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 2(24)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

condone the delay of 36 days in filing the appeal and admit the appeal for adjudication. 4. The assessee has raised the following common grounds of appeal except for variation in figures: 1. The learned CIT(A) has erred in confirming disallowance of Employees Contribution to PF/ESI under section 36(1) (va

SHASTHA ENTERPRISES,KOLLAM vs. ITO, WARD 3, KOLLAM

The appeal is dismissed

ITA 304/COCH/2025[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Jun 2025AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Sabu, CA
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 36(1)(va)

condone the delay in filing the appeals and proceed to dispose of the matters on merits. 5. The assessee filed its return of income for A.Y. 2019–20. The intimation under Section 143(1) of the Act was issued by the CPC, Bengaluru on 22.02.2020, wherein the employees’ contribution to PF and ESI amounting to Rs.19,02,852 was disallowed

ANDIAN KANDY RATHEESH,CALICUT vs. ITO, KOZHIKKODE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 171/COCH/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin28 Jul 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri George George K. & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahuandian Kandy Rateesh The Income Tax Officer 2.2171 A 1, Swastik Circle - 1(1), Tps Vs. Near Civil Station Road Kozhikode Calicut 673020 Pan – Acspr7919M Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri P.V. VijayanFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr.DR
Section 139(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

condone the delay of 23 days in filing the appeal and admit the appeal for hearing. 2. The solitary issue raised by the assessee whether the CIT(A) is justified in confirming the disallowance of employees’ contribution to PF and ESI under Section 36(1)(va

ASSYST INTERNATIONAL PVT LTD,KOCHI vs. DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE1(1) , KOCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 898/COCH/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Mar 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri George George K. & Ms. Padmavathy S.M/S. Assyst International Pvt. Ltd. Vs Dcit, Corporate Circle -1(1) Kochi Ii/138-D, Nh -47, Muttam Thaikkattukkara P.O. Kochi 683106 Pan – Aadca0592R (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Ms. K.Parvathy Ammal, Ca Revenue By: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 02.03.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 08 .03.2023 O R D E R Per: George George K., J.M. This Appeal At The Instance Of The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Cit(A)/Nfac, Delhi Dated 18.05.2022 Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (The Act). The Relevant Assessment Year Is 2019-20. 2. There Is Delay Of ‘64’ Days In Filing This Appeal. The Assessee Has Filed A Petition For Condonation Of Delay & Also An Affidavit Of Cfo Of The Assessee Company Stating, Therein, The Reasons For Belated Filing Of This Appeal. On Perusal Of Reason Stating For Affidavit For Late Filing Of This Appeal, We Are View That There Is ‘Sufficient Cause’ & No Latches Can Be Attributable To The Assessee. Hence, We Condon Delay Of ‘64’ Days In Filing This Appeal & Proceed To Dispose Of The Same On Merits.

For Appellant: Ms. K.Parvathy Ammal, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 250Section 36(1)(va)

condon delay of ‘64’ days in filing this appeal and proceed to dispose of the same on merits. 2 M/s. Assyst International Pvt. Ltd. 3. The assessee has raised several grounds of appeal. All the grounds relate to the solitary issue, whether the assessee is entitled to deduction of Rs.4,31,783/- being employees’ contribution paid beyond the ‘due date