M/S.MUVATTUPUZHA SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD, MUVATTUPUZHA,ERNAKULAM vs. THE JT DIT ( I & CI), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

E R Per George George K, JM : This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against the order of the CIT(A) dated 26.02.2019. The relevant assessment year are 2011-2012 to 2013-2014. The order of the CIT(A) arises out of the order passed u/s 272A(2)(c) r.w.s. 274 of the Income

M/S.ENGANDIYUR FARMER'S SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,THRISSUR vs. ADCIT(INTELLIGENCE), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

Bench: Shri George George Kasst.Years 2011-2012, 2012-2013 & 2013-2014

E R This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against the CIT(A)’s order dated 20.03.2017. The relevant assessment years are 2011-2012, 2012-2013 & 2013-2014. The order of the CIT(A) arises out of the order passed u/s 272A(2)(c) r.w.s. 274 of the Income-tax Act. 2. There was a delay

M/S.KADUTHURUTHY REGIONAL SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,KOTTAYAM vs. THE JT IT(TDS), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

Bench: Shri George Mathankaduthuruthy Regional Service Joint Commissioner Of Co-Op Bank Ltd. Income Tax (Tds) Vs. Kaduthuruthuy P.O. Trivandrum Kottayam Pan – Aaajk0315Q Appellant Respondent

condone the delay in filing the appeal and proceed to dispose of the appeal of the assessee on merits. 4. When the appeal was posted for hearing on 12.10.2020 a person claiming to be Shri T.C. Vinod, Secretary of the assessee Co-operative bank participated in the video hearing. He was directed to file his authorisation for representing the appeal

M/S.THE PUDUNAGARAM SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,PALAKKAD vs. THE JT DIT ( I & CI), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

E R Per George George K, JM : This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against the order of the CIT(A) dated 26.02.2019. The relevant assessment year is 2011-2012. The order of the CIT(A) arises out of the order passed u/s 272A(2)(c) r.w.s. 274 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. There

M/S.THYCATTUSSERRY SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,ALAPPUZHA vs. THE JT DIT ( I & C1), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

E R Per George George K, JM : These appeals at the instance of the assessee are directed against separate order of the CIT(A). The orders of the CIT(A) arise out of the order passed u/s 272A(2)(c) r.w.s. 274 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. The assessees in the case of M/s.Mekkadampu Service Co-operative Bank

M/S.POLPULLY SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,PALAKKAD vs. THE ITO,WD-2, PALAKKAD

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

E R Per George George K, JM : These appeals at the instance of the assessee are directed against separate order of the CIT(A). The orders of the CIT(A) arise out of the order passed u/s 272A(2)(c) r.w.s. 274 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. The assessees in the case of M/s.Mekkadampu Service Co-operative Bank

UZHAVA SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,ALAPPUZHA vs. THE ITO, WD-4, ALAPPUZHA, ALAPPUZHA

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

E R Per George George K, JM : These appeals at the instance of the assessee are directed against separate order of the CIT(A). The orders of the CIT(A) arise out of the order passed u/s 272A(2)(c) r.w.s. 274 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. The assessees in the case of M/s.Mekkadampu Service Co-operative Bank

M/S.NEENDOOR SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,KOTTYAM vs. THE ADDIT( I & CI), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

E R Per George George K, JM : These appeals at the instance of the assessee are directed against separate order of the CIT(A). The orders of the CIT(A) arise out of the order passed u/s 272A(2)(c) r.w.s. 274 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. The assessees in the case of M/s.Mekkadampu Service Co-operative Bank

M/S.MEKKADAMPU SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,ERNAKULAM DIST vs. THE JT DIT ( I & CI), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

E R Per George George K, JM : These appeals at the instance of the assessee are directed against separate order of the CIT(A). The orders of the CIT(A) arise out of the order passed u/s 272A(2)(c) r.w.s. 274 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. The assessees in the case of M/s.Mekkadampu Service Co-operative Bank

MANAKKAD SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD, THODUPUZHA,IDUKKI DIST vs. THE JT DIRECTOR OF IT (I &C1), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

E R Per George George K, JM : These appeals at the instance of the assessee are directed against separate order of the CIT(A). The orders of the CIT(A) arise out of the order passed u/s 272A(2)(c) r.w.s. 274 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. The assessees in the case of M/s.Mekkadampu Service Co-operative Bank

M/S.PUDUKKAD SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,THRISSUR vs. THE JT DIRECTOR OF IT ( I&C1), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

E R Per George George K, JM : These appeals at the instance of the assessee are directed against separate order of the CIT(A). The orders of the CIT(A) arise out of the order passed u/s 272A(2)(c) r.w.s. 274 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. The assessees in the case of M/s.Mekkadampu Service Co-operative Bank

M/S.PALLIPURAM VILLAGE SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,ALAPPUZHA DIST vs. THE JT. DIRECTOR OF IT (I&1C), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

E R Per George George K, JM : These appeals at the instance of the assessee are directed against separate order of the CIT(A). The orders of the CIT(A) arise out of the order passed u/s 272A(2)(c) r.w.s. 274 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. The assessees in the case of M/s.Mekkadampu Service Co-operative Bank

PALLICKAL NADUVEILEMURI ERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,KAYAMKULAM vs. THE ADDL DIRECTOR OF (INTELLIGENCE), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

E R Per George George K, JM : These appeals at the instance of the assessee are directed against separate order of the CIT(A). The orders of the CIT(A) arise out of the order passed u/s 272A(2)(c) r.w.s. 274 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. The assessees in the case of M/s.Mekkadampu Service Co-operative Bank

M/S.ALLEPPEY NORTH SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,ALAPPUZHA vs. THE JT DIT ( I & CI), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

E R Per George George K, JM : This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against the order of the CIT(A) dated 26.02.2019. The relevant assessment year is 2011-2012. The order of the CIT(A) arises out of the order passed u/s 272A(2)(c) r.w.s. 274 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. There

M/S.JEENA HOTEL & UDAYA BAR,ALAPPUZHA vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-1,, ALAPPUZHA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

E R Per CHANDRA POOJARI, AM: This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the CIT(A), Kottayam dated 26/12/2017 and pertain to the assessment year 2008-09. 2. There was a delay of 71 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal. The Ld. AR has filed condonation petition accompanied by an affidavit stating that

DISTRICT PROJECT OFFICE KOZHIKODE,KOZHIKODE vs. ACIT, CPC TDS, KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE

In the result, the appeal filed by assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

e-return was vacant and as the Government had not appointed anyone, the delay in filing the TDS return occurred. He also submitted that inadvertently the plea of condonation of delay was sought as a ground in Form 35 filed before the Ld.CIT(A). 5.1 On merits, the Ld.AR submitted that late filing fee of the TDS return cannot

COMMISSIONER FOR GOVT EXAMINATIONS ,POOJAPPURA vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1(2), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are dismissed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das

condoned, no serious objection to which was raised by Smt. Devi, the ld. Sr. DR. 4. None appeared for the appellant when the appeals were called out for hearing, and neither is there any adjournment motion despite service of notice of hearing. Hearing in the matter was accordingly proceeded ex parte qua the assessee. 5. We have heard the party

COMMISSIONER FOR GOVT EXAMINATIONS ,POOJAPPURA vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1(2), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are dismissed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das

condoned, no serious objection to which was raised by Smt. Devi, the ld. Sr. DR. 4. None appeared for the appellant when the appeals were called out for hearing, and neither is there any adjournment motion despite service of notice of hearing. Hearing in the matter was accordingly proceeded ex parte qua the assessee. 5. We have heard the party

COMMISSIONER FOR GOVT EXAMINATIONS ,POOJAPPURA vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1(2), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are dismissed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das

condoned, no serious objection to which was raised by Smt. Devi, the ld. Sr. DR. 4. None appeared for the appellant when the appeals were called out for hearing, and neither is there any adjournment motion despite service of notice of hearing. Hearing in the matter was accordingly proceeded ex parte qua the assessee. 5. We have heard the party