M/S.PALLIPURAM VILLAGE SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,ALAPPUZHA DIST vs. THE JT. DIRECTOR OF IT (I&1C), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

condone the delay and proceed to dispose off the same on merits. 4. The brief facts of the case are as follow: 4.1 The assessees are Co-operative Societies registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. The assessees were served with notice u/s 133(6) of the Income- tax Act. The assessees were directed to furnish details

M/S.PUDUKKAD SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,THRISSUR vs. THE JT DIRECTOR OF IT ( I&C1), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

condone the delay and proceed to dispose off the same on merits. 4. The brief facts of the case are as follow: 4.1 The assessees are Co-operative Societies registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. The assessees were served with notice u/s 133(6) of the Income- tax Act. The assessees were directed to furnish details

MANAKKAD SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD, THODUPUZHA,IDUKKI DIST vs. THE JT DIRECTOR OF IT (I &C1), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

condone the delay and proceed to dispose off the same on merits. 4. The brief facts of the case are as follow: 4.1 The assessees are Co-operative Societies registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. The assessees were served with notice u/s 133(6) of the Income- tax Act. The assessees were directed to furnish details

M/S.MEKKADAMPU SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,ERNAKULAM DIST vs. THE JT DIT ( I & CI), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

condone the delay and proceed to dispose off the same on merits. 4. The brief facts of the case are as follow: 4.1 The assessees are Co-operative Societies registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. The assessees were served with notice u/s 133(6) of the Income- tax Act. The assessees were directed to furnish details

M/S.NEENDOOR SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,KOTTYAM vs. THE ADDIT( I & CI), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

condone the delay and proceed to dispose off the same on merits. 4. The brief facts of the case are as follow: 4.1 The assessees are Co-operative Societies registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. The assessees were served with notice u/s 133(6) of the Income- tax Act. The assessees were directed to furnish details

UZHAVA SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,ALAPPUZHA vs. THE ITO, WD-4, ALAPPUZHA, ALAPPUZHA

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

condone the delay and proceed to dispose off the same on merits. 4. The brief facts of the case are as follow: 4.1 The assessees are Co-operative Societies registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. The assessees were served with notice u/s 133(6) of the Income- tax Act. The assessees were directed to furnish details

M/S.POLPULLY SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,PALAKKAD vs. THE ITO,WD-2, PALAKKAD

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

condone the delay and proceed to dispose off the same on merits. 4. The brief facts of the case are as follow: 4.1 The assessees are Co-operative Societies registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. The assessees were served with notice u/s 133(6) of the Income- tax Act. The assessees were directed to furnish details

M/S.THYCATTUSSERRY SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,ALAPPUZHA vs. THE JT DIT ( I & C1), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

condone the delay and proceed to dispose off the same on merits. 4. The brief facts of the case are as follow: 4.1 The assessees are Co-operative Societies registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. The assessees were served with notice u/s 133(6) of the Income- tax Act. The assessees were directed to furnish details

M/S.THE PUDUNAGARAM SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,PALAKKAD vs. THE JT DIT ( I & CI), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

condone the delay and proceed to dispose of the same on merits. 3. The brief facts of the case are as follow: ITA No.461/Coch/2019. 2 M/s.The Pudunagaram Service Co-op Bank Ltd. 3.1 The assessee is a Co-operative Society registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. The assessee was served with notice

M/S.KADUTHURUTHY REGIONAL SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,KOTTAYAM vs. THE JT IT(TDS), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

Bench: Shri George Mathankaduthuruthy Regional Service Joint Commissioner Of Co-Op Bank Ltd. Income Tax (Tds) Vs. Kaduthuruthuy P.O. Trivandrum Kottayam Pan – Aaajk0315Q Appellant Respondent

C. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) ought to have seen that the information under Section 133(6) shall be called for only for the purpose of the Income Tax Act 1961 and no such purpose was mentioned in the notice issued by the Income Tax Officer (TDS), Kottayam. D. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) ought to have seen

M/S.ALLEPPEY NORTH SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,ALAPPUZHA vs. THE JT DIT ( I & CI), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

condone the delay and proceed to dispose off the same on merits. ITA No.458/Coch/2019. 2 M/s.Alleppey North Service Co-op Bank Ltd. 3. The brief facts of the case are as follow: 3.1 The assessee is a Co-operative Society registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. The assessee was served with notice

M/S.JEENA HOTEL & UDAYA BAR,ALAPPUZHA vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-1,, ALAPPUZHA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

condone the delay of 71 days in filing the appeal and admit the appeal for adjudication. 3. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: 1. The learned Commissioner of Income-tax(Appeals) erred in confirming the penalty of Rs.1 lakh levied u/s. 271B of the Income Tax Act. I.T.A. No.265/Coch/2018 2. The learned Commissioner of Income-tax(Appeals

DISTRICT PROJECT OFFICE KOZHIKODE,KOZHIKODE vs. ACIT, CPC TDS, KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE

In the result, the appeal filed by assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

272A(2), it can be said that a particular set up for imposition and the payment of fee under Section 234E was provided but, it did not provide for making of demand of such fee under Section 200A payable under Section 234E. Hence, considering the aforesaid peculiar facts and circumstances, we are unable to accept the contention of the learned

COMMISSIONER FOR GOVT EXAMINATIONS ,POOJAPPURA vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1(2), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are dismissed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das

condoned, no serious objection to which was raised by Smt. Devi, the ld. Sr. DR. 4. None appeared for the appellant when the appeals were called out for hearing, and neither is there any adjournment motion despite service of notice of hearing. Hearing in the matter was accordingly proceeded ex parte qua the assessee. 5. We have heard the party

COMMISSIONER FOR GOVT EXAMINATIONS ,POOJAPPURA vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1(2), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are dismissed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das

condoned, no serious objection to which was raised by Smt. Devi, the ld. Sr. DR. 4. None appeared for the appellant when the appeals were called out for hearing, and neither is there any adjournment motion despite service of notice of hearing. Hearing in the matter was accordingly proceeded ex parte qua the assessee. 5. We have heard the party

COMMISSIONER FOR GOVT EXAMINATIONS ,POOJAPPURA vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1(2), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are dismissed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das

condoned, no serious objection to which was raised by Smt. Devi, the ld. Sr. DR. 4. None appeared for the appellant when the appeals were called out for hearing, and neither is there any adjournment motion despite service of notice of hearing. Hearing in the matter was accordingly proceeded ex parte qua the assessee. 5. We have heard the party

COMMISSIONER FOR GOVT EXAMINATIONS ,POOJAPPURA vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1(2), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are dismissed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das

condoned, no serious objection to which was raised by Smt. Devi, the ld. Sr. DR. 4. None appeared for the appellant when the appeals were called out for hearing, and neither is there any adjournment motion despite service of notice of hearing. Hearing in the matter was accordingly proceeded ex parte qua the assessee. 5. We have heard the party

COMMISSIONER FOR GOVT EXAMINATIONS ,POOJAPPURA vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1(2), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are dismissed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das

condoned, no serious objection to which was raised by Smt. Devi, the ld. Sr. DR. 4. None appeared for the appellant when the appeals were called out for hearing, and neither is there any adjournment motion despite service of notice of hearing. Hearing in the matter was accordingly proceeded ex parte qua the assessee. 5. We have heard the party