BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

28 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 272Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Pune245Delhi162Chennai86Surat50Mumbai48Bangalore46Visakhapatnam38Ahmedabad38Cochin28Lucknow25Karnataka21Hyderabad20Kolkata19Cuttack19Nagpur19Indore14Allahabad11Chandigarh11Panaji10Patna9Jaipur9Rajkot9Amritsar7Agra4Raipur3Jabalpur3SC2Ranchi1Jodhpur1Varanasi1Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 133(6)40Section 20033Section 206C33Section 19233Section 272A(2)(c)19Limitation/Time-bar17Section 234E16Condonation of Delay14TDS

DISTRICT PROJECT OFFICE KOZHIKODE,KOZHIKODE vs. ACIT, CPC TDS, KOZHIKODE, KOZHIKODE

In the result, the appeal filed by assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 220/COCH/2021[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin15 Sept 2022AY 2014-2015
For Appellant: None
Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

272A(2), it can be said that a particular set up for imposition and the payment of fee under Section 234E was provided but, it did not provide for making of demand of such fee under Section 200A payable under Section 234E. Hence, considering the aforesaid peculiar facts and circumstances, we are unable to accept the contention of the learned

M/S.JEENA HOTEL & UDAYA BAR,ALAPPUZHA vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-1,, ALAPPUZHA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Showing 1–20 of 28 · Page 1 of 2

13
Penalty8
Section 271B5
Section 1334
ITA 265/COCH/2018[2008-09]Status: Disposed
ITAT Cochin
01 Aug 2019
AY 2008-09

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 271BSection 44A

condone the delay of 71 days in filing the appeal and admit the appeal for adjudication. 3. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: 1. The learned Commissioner of Income-tax(Appeals) erred in confirming the penalty of Rs.1 lakh levied u/s. 271B of the Income Tax Act. I.T.A. No.265/Coch/2018 2. The learned Commissioner of Income-tax(Appeals

M/S.KADUTHURUTHY REGIONAL SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,KOTTAYAM vs. THE JT IT(TDS), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

ITA 308/COCH/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 Oct 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri George Mathankaduthuruthy Regional Service Joint Commissioner Of Co-Op Bank Ltd. Income Tax (Tds) Vs. Kaduthuruthuy P.O. Trivandrum Kottayam Pan – Aaajk0315Q Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Ms. J.M. Jamuna Devi
Section 133Section 133(6)Section 194A

condone the delay in filing the appeal and proceed to dispose of the appeal of the assessee on merits. 4. When the appeal was posted for hearing on 12.10.2020 a person claiming to be Shri T.C. Vinod, Secretary of the assessee Co-operative bank participated in the video hearing. He was directed to file his authorisation for representing the appeal

M/S.MUVATTUPUZHA SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD, MUVATTUPUZHA,ERNAKULAM vs. THE JT DIT ( I & CI), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

ITA 471/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin04 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Smt.S.SwathyFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 133Section 133(6)Section 272Section 272A(2)(c)Section 275(1)

condone the delay and proceed to dispose of the same on merits. 3. The brief facts of the case are as follow: ITA No.471/Coch/2019. 2 M/s.Muvattupuzha Service Co-op Bank Ltd. 3.1 The assessee is a Co-operative Society registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. The assessee was served with notice u/s 133(6) of the Income

M/S.THE PUDUNAGARAM SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,PALAKKAD vs. THE JT DIT ( I & CI), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

ITA 461/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin04 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: --- None ---For Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 133(6)Section 272A(2)Section 272A(2)(c)Section 273

condone the delay and proceed to dispose of the same on merits. 3. The brief facts of the case are as follow: ITA No.461/Coch/2019. 2 M/s.The Pudunagaram Service Co-op Bank Ltd. 3.1 The assessee is a Co-operative Society registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. The assessee was served with notice

M/S.ENGANDIYUR FARMER'S SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,THRISSUR vs. ADCIT(INTELLIGENCE), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

ITA 332/COCH/2017[2010-11,2011-12 &12-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin05 Jan 2018

Bench: Shri George George Kasst.Years 2011-2012, 2012-2013 & 2013-2014

For Appellant: Ms. Mekhala M.BennyFor Respondent: Sri. A.Dhanaraj, Sr.DR
Section 133Section 133(6)Section 272Section 272A(2)Section 272A(2)(c)Section 274Section 274(1)Section 275(1)(c)

condone the delay of 41 days and proceed to dispose of the same on merits. 3. The brief facts of the case are as follow: 3.1 The assessee is a Co-operative Society registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. The assessee was served with notice u/s 133(6) of the Income-tax Act. The assessee was directed

M/S.THYCATTUSSERRY SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,ALAPPUZHA vs. THE JT DIT ( I & C1), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

ITA 260/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Jul 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

Section 133(6)Section 272A(2)(c)

condone the delay and proceed to dispose off the same on merits. 4. The brief facts of the case are as follow: 4.1 The assessees are Co-operative Societies registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. The assessees were served with notice u/s 133(6) of the Income- tax Act. The assessees were directed to furnish details

M/S.POLPULLY SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,PALAKKAD vs. THE ITO,WD-2, PALAKKAD

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

ITA 226/COCH/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Jul 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

Section 133(6)Section 272A(2)(c)

condone the delay and proceed to dispose off the same on merits. 4. The brief facts of the case are as follow: 4.1 The assessees are Co-operative Societies registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. The assessees were served with notice u/s 133(6) of the Income- tax Act. The assessees were directed to furnish details

UZHAVA SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,ALAPPUZHA vs. THE ITO, WD-4, ALAPPUZHA, ALAPPUZHA

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

ITA 392/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Jul 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

Section 133(6)Section 272A(2)(c)

condone the delay and proceed to dispose off the same on merits. 4. The brief facts of the case are as follow: 4.1 The assessees are Co-operative Societies registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. The assessees were served with notice u/s 133(6) of the Income- tax Act. The assessees were directed to furnish details

M/S.NEENDOOR SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,KOTTYAM vs. THE ADDIT( I & CI), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

ITA 405/COCH/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Jul 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

Section 133(6)Section 272A(2)(c)

condone the delay and proceed to dispose off the same on merits. 4. The brief facts of the case are as follow: 4.1 The assessees are Co-operative Societies registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. The assessees were served with notice u/s 133(6) of the Income- tax Act. The assessees were directed to furnish details

M/S.MEKKADAMPU SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,ERNAKULAM DIST vs. THE JT DIT ( I & CI), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

ITA 418/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Jul 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

Section 133(6)Section 272A(2)(c)

condone the delay and proceed to dispose off the same on merits. 4. The brief facts of the case are as follow: 4.1 The assessees are Co-operative Societies registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. The assessees were served with notice u/s 133(6) of the Income- tax Act. The assessees were directed to furnish details

MANAKKAD SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD, THODUPUZHA,IDUKKI DIST vs. THE JT DIRECTOR OF IT (I &C1), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

ITA 235/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Jul 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

Section 133(6)Section 272A(2)(c)

condone the delay and proceed to dispose off the same on merits. 4. The brief facts of the case are as follow: 4.1 The assessees are Co-operative Societies registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. The assessees were served with notice u/s 133(6) of the Income- tax Act. The assessees were directed to furnish details

M/S.PUDUKKAD SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,THRISSUR vs. THE JT DIRECTOR OF IT ( I&C1), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

ITA 259/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Jul 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

Section 133(6)Section 272A(2)(c)

condone the delay and proceed to dispose off the same on merits. 4. The brief facts of the case are as follow: 4.1 The assessees are Co-operative Societies registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. The assessees were served with notice u/s 133(6) of the Income- tax Act. The assessees were directed to furnish details

M/S.PALLIPURAM VILLAGE SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,ALAPPUZHA DIST vs. THE JT. DIRECTOR OF IT (I&1C), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

ITA 261/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Jul 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

Section 133(6)Section 272A(2)(c)

condone the delay and proceed to dispose off the same on merits. 4. The brief facts of the case are as follow: 4.1 The assessees are Co-operative Societies registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. The assessees were served with notice u/s 133(6) of the Income- tax Act. The assessees were directed to furnish details

PALLICKAL NADUVEILEMURI ERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,KAYAMKULAM vs. THE ADDL DIRECTOR OF (INTELLIGENCE), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

ITA 262/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Jul 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

Section 133(6)Section 272A(2)(c)

condone the delay and proceed to dispose off the same on merits. 4. The brief facts of the case are as follow: 4.1 The assessees are Co-operative Societies registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. The assessees were served with notice u/s 133(6) of the Income- tax Act. The assessees were directed to furnish details

M/S.ALLEPPEY NORTH SERVICE CO-OP BANK LTD,ALAPPUZHA vs. THE JT DIT ( I & CI), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

ITA 458/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin19 Aug 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Smt.Swathy SFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 133Section 133(6)Section 272A(2)(c)Section 275(1)

condone the delay and proceed to dispose off the same on merits. ITA No.458/Coch/2019. 2 M/s.Alleppey North Service Co-op Bank Ltd. 3. The brief facts of the case are as follow: 3.1 The assessee is a Co-operative Society registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969. The assessee was served with notice

M/S.MARYMATHA SCHOOL TRUST,COCHIN vs. THE ITO(EXEMPTION), COCHIN

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 285/COCH/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Aug 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm I.T.A. No.285/Coch/2017 Assessment Year : 2012-13 M/S. Mary Matha School Trust, Vs. The Income Tax Officer Thrikkakara P.O. (Exemption), Kochi. Kochi-682 021. [Pan:Aabtm 0241L]

Section 11Section 11(1)(a)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 272A(2)(e)Section 272A(3)Section 272A(4)

condone the delay of 24 days in filing the appeal and admit the appeal. 3. The assessee has raised the following ground of appeal: 1. The learned Commissioner ought to have convinced with the fact that depreciation is an allowable application of income u/s. 11, as the amendment is prospective in nature and effective from assessment year

COMMISSIONER FOR GOVT EXAMINATIONS ,POOJAPPURA vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1(2), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are dismissed

ITA 993/COCH/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin15 Apr 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das

For Appellant: ----- None -----For Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 192Section 200Section 206CSection 234E

condoned, no serious objection to which was raised by Smt. Devi, the ld. Sr. DR. 4. None appeared for the appellant when the appeals were called out for hearing, and neither is there any adjournment motion despite service of notice of hearing. Hearing in the matter was accordingly proceeded ex parte qua the assessee. 5. We have heard the party

COMMISSIONER FOR GOVT EXAMINATIONS ,POOJAPPURA vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1(2), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are dismissed

ITA 992/COCH/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin15 Apr 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das

For Appellant: ----- None -----For Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 192Section 200Section 206CSection 234E

condoned, no serious objection to which was raised by Smt. Devi, the ld. Sr. DR. 4. None appeared for the appellant when the appeals were called out for hearing, and neither is there any adjournment motion despite service of notice of hearing. Hearing in the matter was accordingly proceeded ex parte qua the assessee. 5. We have heard the party

COMMISSIONER FOR GOVT EXAMINATIONS ,POOJAPPURA vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1(2), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are dismissed

ITA 987/COCH/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin15 Apr 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Das

For Appellant: ----- None -----For Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 192Section 200Section 206CSection 234E

condoned, no serious objection to which was raised by Smt. Devi, the ld. Sr. DR. 4. None appeared for the appellant when the appeals were called out for hearing, and neither is there any adjournment motion despite service of notice of hearing. Hearing in the matter was accordingly proceeded ex parte qua the assessee. 5. We have heard the party