BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

13 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 269clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka101Mumbai98Chennai66Delhi59Bangalore55Kolkata46Jaipur30Cuttack27Hyderabad22Ahmedabad17Lucknow17Pune14Cochin13Amritsar10Chandigarh10Varanasi8Surat8Raipur8Indore8Nagpur7Allahabad6Guwahati5Calcutta5SC2Jodhpur2Telangana1Jabalpur1Patna1Visakhapatnam1Andhra Pradesh1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 26344Section 143(3)22Section 13122Section 142A11Section 80P4Section 2502Section 1482

M/S. PARAVUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK,KOLLAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeal and stay petition filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 767/COCH/2023[AY 2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Jul 2024

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Soundararajan K.Assessment Year: 2017-18

For Appellant: Sri Santosh P. Abraham, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, D.R
Section 250Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

Section 253(3) of I.T. Act, leading us unhesitatingly to reject assessee’s request for condonation of delay in filing of this appeal within time prescribed U/s 253(3) of I.T. Act. M/s. Paravur Service Co-operative Bank Ltd., Thiruvananthapuram Page 16 of 23 4.7 Further, at this stage, it is pertinent to mention the various precedents as follows

M/S.ARDRA ASSOCIATES,TRICHUR vs. THE DCIT, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeals of

ITA 496/COCH/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm I.T.A. Nos. 374 To 379/Coch/2017 Assessment Years : 2008-09 To 2012-13 & 2014-15

Section 131Section 142ASection 143(3)Section 263

269 1TR 260. It was submitted that the ITAT, Kolkata in Machinery Agencies (India) v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax in [2012] 27 taxmann.com 168 (Kolkata-Trib) held that if the DVO report, which was received subsequent to the assessment order, was to be accepted, then the concept of finality of assessment will have to be buried deep and time

M/S.ARDRA ASSOCIATES,TRICHUR vs. THE DCIT, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeals of

ITA 499/COCH/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm I.T.A. Nos. 374 To 379/Coch/2017 Assessment Years : 2008-09 To 2012-13 & 2014-15

Section 131Section 142ASection 143(3)Section 263

269 1TR 260. It was submitted that the ITAT, Kolkata in Machinery Agencies (India) v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax in [2012] 27 taxmann.com 168 (Kolkata-Trib) held that if the DVO report, which was received subsequent to the assessment order, was to be accepted, then the concept of finality of assessment will have to be buried deep and time

THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKKODE, KOZHIKKODE vs. M/S.ARDRA ASSOCIATES, THRISSUR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeals of

ITA 374/COCH/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm I.T.A. Nos. 374 To 379/Coch/2017 Assessment Years : 2008-09 To 2012-13 & 2014-15

Section 131Section 142ASection 143(3)Section 263

269 1TR 260. It was submitted that the ITAT, Kolkata in Machinery Agencies (India) v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax in [2012] 27 taxmann.com 168 (Kolkata-Trib) held that if the DVO report, which was received subsequent to the assessment order, was to be accepted, then the concept of finality of assessment will have to be buried deep and time

THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKKODE, KOZHIKKODE vs. M/S.ARDRA ASSOCIATES, THRISSUR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeals of

ITA 376/COCH/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm I.T.A. Nos. 374 To 379/Coch/2017 Assessment Years : 2008-09 To 2012-13 & 2014-15

Section 131Section 142ASection 143(3)Section 263

269 1TR 260. It was submitted that the ITAT, Kolkata in Machinery Agencies (India) v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax in [2012] 27 taxmann.com 168 (Kolkata-Trib) held that if the DVO report, which was received subsequent to the assessment order, was to be accepted, then the concept of finality of assessment will have to be buried deep and time

THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKKODE, KOZHIKKODE vs. M/S.ARDRA ASSOCIATES, THRISSUR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeals of

ITA 377/COCH/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm I.T.A. Nos. 374 To 379/Coch/2017 Assessment Years : 2008-09 To 2012-13 & 2014-15

Section 131Section 142ASection 143(3)Section 263

269 1TR 260. It was submitted that the ITAT, Kolkata in Machinery Agencies (India) v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax in [2012] 27 taxmann.com 168 (Kolkata-Trib) held that if the DVO report, which was received subsequent to the assessment order, was to be accepted, then the concept of finality of assessment will have to be buried deep and time

THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKKODE, KOZHIKKODE vs. M/S.ARDRA ASSOCIATES, THRISSUR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeals of

ITA 378/COCH/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm I.T.A. Nos. 374 To 379/Coch/2017 Assessment Years : 2008-09 To 2012-13 & 2014-15

Section 131Section 142ASection 143(3)Section 263

269 1TR 260. It was submitted that the ITAT, Kolkata in Machinery Agencies (India) v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax in [2012] 27 taxmann.com 168 (Kolkata-Trib) held that if the DVO report, which was received subsequent to the assessment order, was to be accepted, then the concept of finality of assessment will have to be buried deep and time

THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKKODE, KOZHIKKODE vs. M/S.ARDRA ASSOCIATES, THRISSUR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeals of

ITA 379/COCH/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm I.T.A. Nos. 374 To 379/Coch/2017 Assessment Years : 2008-09 To 2012-13 & 2014-15

Section 131Section 142ASection 143(3)Section 263

269 1TR 260. It was submitted that the ITAT, Kolkata in Machinery Agencies (India) v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax in [2012] 27 taxmann.com 168 (Kolkata-Trib) held that if the DVO report, which was received subsequent to the assessment order, was to be accepted, then the concept of finality of assessment will have to be buried deep and time

M/S.ARDRA ASSOCIATES,TRICHUR vs. THE DCIT(, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeals of

ITA 495/COCH/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm I.T.A. Nos. 374 To 379/Coch/2017 Assessment Years : 2008-09 To 2012-13 & 2014-15

Section 131Section 142ASection 143(3)Section 263

269 1TR 260. It was submitted that the ITAT, Kolkata in Machinery Agencies (India) v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax in [2012] 27 taxmann.com 168 (Kolkata-Trib) held that if the DVO report, which was received subsequent to the assessment order, was to be accepted, then the concept of finality of assessment will have to be buried deep and time

M/S.ARDRA ASSOCIATES,TRICHUR vs. THE DCIT, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeals of

ITA 497/COCH/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm I.T.A. Nos. 374 To 379/Coch/2017 Assessment Years : 2008-09 To 2012-13 & 2014-15

Section 131Section 142ASection 143(3)Section 263

269 1TR 260. It was submitted that the ITAT, Kolkata in Machinery Agencies (India) v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax in [2012] 27 taxmann.com 168 (Kolkata-Trib) held that if the DVO report, which was received subsequent to the assessment order, was to be accepted, then the concept of finality of assessment will have to be buried deep and time

M/S.ARDRA ASSOCIATES,TRICHUR vs. THE DCIT, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeals of

ITA 498/COCH/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm I.T.A. Nos. 374 To 379/Coch/2017 Assessment Years : 2008-09 To 2012-13 & 2014-15

Section 131Section 142ASection 143(3)Section 263

269 1TR 260. It was submitted that the ITAT, Kolkata in Machinery Agencies (India) v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax in [2012] 27 taxmann.com 168 (Kolkata-Trib) held that if the DVO report, which was received subsequent to the assessment order, was to be accepted, then the concept of finality of assessment will have to be buried deep and time

THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKKODE, KOZHIKKODE vs. M/S.ARDRA ASSOCIATES, THRISSUR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeals of

ITA 375/COCH/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm I.T.A. Nos. 374 To 379/Coch/2017 Assessment Years : 2008-09 To 2012-13 & 2014-15

Section 131Section 142ASection 143(3)Section 263

269 1TR 260. It was submitted that the ITAT, Kolkata in Machinery Agencies (India) v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax in [2012] 27 taxmann.com 168 (Kolkata-Trib) held that if the DVO report, which was received subsequent to the assessment order, was to be accepted, then the concept of finality of assessment will have to be buried deep and time

THE ITO, COCHIN vs. SRI.AMBADY KRISHNA MENON, COCHIN

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed and the Cross Objection filed

ITA 4/COCH/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin23 Aug 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 139(1)Section 148Section 271(1)(c)

condone the delay of four days and admit the appeal. 2.3 The assessee has raised the following grounds in its Cross Objection: The additional income of Capital Gains has already been disclosed in the original Return of Income field u/s 139(1) by the Assessee on 30/07/2011 for which disclosure was correct - including the transaction itself and the gross amount