BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 199(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka125Mumbai112Delhi79Chennai77Kolkata62Chandigarh55Bangalore44Calcutta37Pune29Hyderabad28Cuttack26Ahmedabad25Jaipur23Visakhapatnam21Lucknow16Rajkot12Indore7Cochin5Raipur5Andhra Pradesh3Amritsar3Surat3SC2Nagpur2Patna2Dehradun1Jodhpur1Rajasthan1Allahabad1

Key Topics

Section 80P10Section 80A7Section 139(1)6Section 106Section 143(3)4Deduction4Section 80P(2)(a)2Section 119(2)(b)2Section 199(2)2

DCIT, TRIVANDRUM vs. BRAHMOS AEROSPACE( THIRUVANANTHAPURAM) LTD, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeal filedby

ITA 742/COCH/2019[2002-03]Status: HeardITAT Cochin23 Feb 2022AY 2002-03

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri Ramit Kochar, Am Deputy Commissioner Brahmos Aerospace Of Income Tax, (Thiruvananthapuram) Ltd., Circle-1(1), V. Chackai, Thiruvananthapuram Beach Post, Kerala Tiruvananthapuram, Kerala Pan – Aabck2217K Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Smt. Jamunna Devi, Sr.DRFor Respondent: Shri Abraham Joseph Markos, Adv
Section 139(1)Section 139(3)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 44ASection 80

2) , 74(3) and 74A(3) of the 1961 Act. Thus, Section 80 also refers to the time line provided u/s 139(3), which in turn refers to prescribed time u/s 139(1) for filing of return of income and Section 139(3) also stipulates that all the provisions of the 1961 Act shall apply

Condonation of Delay2

SRI.KRISHNAN ACHARY,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE ITO, WD-3,, THIRUVALLA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 432/COCH/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin24 Feb 2020AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri George George K.

Section 10Section 148

condone the delay of 88 days and proceed to dispose off the appeal on merits. 3 I.T.A. No.432Coch/2018 3. The solitary issue that is raised is whether the CIT(A) is justified in confirming the action of the Assessing Officer in disallowing the claim of deduction u/s. 10(10C) of the I.T. Act. 4. The brief facts of the case

TRIVANDRUM DISTRICT ELECTRICITY BOARD EMPLOYEES CO-OP SOCIETY,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ITO, WD-2(1), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeals stand partly allowed

ITA 411/COCH/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin19 Feb 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Keshav Dubey, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Amaljith, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 119(2)(b)Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 199(2)Section 80ASection 80P

section 80AC of the Act. However, in view of the fact that the learned CCIT, Trivandrum had condoned the delay in filing the return of income vide proceedings u/s. 199(2

TRIVANDRUM DISTRICT ELECTRICITY BOARD EMPLOYEES CO-OP SOCIETY,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ITO, WD-2(1), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeals stand partly allowed

ITA 410/COCH/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin19 Feb 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Keshav Dubey, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Amaljith, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 119(2)(b)Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 199(2)Section 80ASection 80P

section 80AC of the Act. However, in view of the fact that the learned CCIT, Trivandrum had condoned the delay in filing the return of income vide proceedings u/s. 199(2

PUNNAYURKULAM SERVICE CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO P 417,PUNNAYURKULAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, GURUVAYUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands dismissed

ITA 446/COCH/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Aug 2025AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Soundararajan K, Jm Assessment Year: 2023-24 Punnayurkulam Service Cooperative .......... Appellant Bank Ltd. No. P417, Punnayurkulam, Thrissur. [Pan: Aacap 6129 J] Vs. Income Tax Officer .......... Respondent Ward-1, Thrissur. Appellant By: Shri Ramdas M, Ca Respondent By: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 04.08.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 08.08.2025 O R D E R Per: Inturi Rama Rao, Am This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [Cit(A)] Dated 20.05.2025 For Assessment Year (Ay) 2023-24. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That Assessee Is A Cooperative Society Registered Under Kerala Co-Operative Societies Act, 1969. It Is Classified As Primary Agricultural Credit Cooperative Society. It Is Engaged In The Business Of Accepting Deposits From Its Members & Providing Credit Facilities To Its Members. The Return Of Income For The A.Y. 2023-24 Was Filed On 31/12/2020 Declaring Nil Income After

For Appellant: Shri Ramdas M, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 199(2)(b)Section 80ASection 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

199(2)(b) of the Act before the learned PCIT for condonation of delay and prayed that appeal may be allowed. 6. On the other hand, learned Sr.DR relied on the orders passed by the lower authorities. 7. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. 8. The provisions of section