BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 197A(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Nagpur89Chennai72Karnataka21Mumbai7Bangalore7Cochin5Jaipur5Panaji3Cuttack3Jodhpur2Kolkata2Chandigarh1Pune1

Key Topics

Section 4012Section 194A9Section 197A8Section 206A8Exemption5Deduction5TDS5Condonation of Delay5Section 194A(3)4

THE ALLEPPEY DIST CO- BANK LTD,ALAPPUZHA vs. THE ACIT, ALAPPUZHA

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee for assessment year 2011-2012, 2012-2013 and 2014-2015 are

ITA 386/COCH/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin04 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.R.KrishnanFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 139ASection 194ASection 194A(3)Section 197ASection 206ASection 40

condone the delay and proceed to dispose of the appeals on merits. 3. We shall adjudicate first, the common issue raised in all appeals, namely, disallowance of interest payment for non- deduction of tax by invoking provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the I.T.Act. The brief facts in relation to the above issue are as follows:- The assessee

Section 139A4
Disallowance4
Section 2012

THE ALLEPPEY DIST CO- BANK LTD,ALAPPUZHA vs. THE ACIT, ALAPPUZHA

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee for assessment year 2011-2012, 2012-2013 and 2014-2015 are

ITA 388/COCH/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin04 Sept 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.R.KrishnanFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 139ASection 194ASection 194A(3)Section 197ASection 206ASection 40

condone the delay and proceed to dispose of the appeals on merits. 3. We shall adjudicate first, the common issue raised in all appeals, namely, disallowance of interest payment for non- deduction of tax by invoking provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the I.T.Act. The brief facts in relation to the above issue are as follows:- The assessee

THE ALLEPPEY DIST CO- BANK LTD,ALAPPUZHA vs. THE ACIT, ALAPPUZHA

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee for assessment year 2011-2012, 2012-2013 and 2014-2015 are

ITA 387/COCH/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin04 Sept 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.R.KrishnanFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 139ASection 194ASection 194A(3)Section 197ASection 206ASection 40

condone the delay and proceed to dispose of the appeals on merits. 3. We shall adjudicate first, the common issue raised in all appeals, namely, disallowance of interest payment for non- deduction of tax by invoking provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the I.T.Act. The brief facts in relation to the above issue are as follows:- The assessee

THE ALLEPPEY DIST CO- BANK LTD,ALAPPUZHA vs. THE ACIT, ALAPPUZHA

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee for assessment year 2011-2012, 2012-2013 and 2014-2015 are

ITA 389/COCH/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin04 Sept 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.R.KrishnanFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 139ASection 194ASection 194A(3)Section 197ASection 206ASection 40

condone the delay and proceed to dispose of the appeals on merits. 3. We shall adjudicate first, the common issue raised in all appeals, namely, disallowance of interest payment for non- deduction of tax by invoking provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the I.T.Act. The brief facts in relation to the above issue are as follows:- The assessee

THE SOUTH INDIAN BANK LIMITED,THRISSUR vs. DCIT,TDS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 1061/COCH/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin16 May 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri George George K., Vp & Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am

For Appellant: Shri Naresh C., CAFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 10Section 194ASection 201Section 297

condone the delay and admit the appeal for adjudication. 6. The learned counsel for the assessee submitted that the CIT(A) had failed to appreciate that the login through the TAN in the income tax portal do not provide for the assessment year and provided only for the financial year. He further submitted that no deduction of tax is required