BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 153Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai96Delhi80Amritsar37Mumbai33Kolkata30Bangalore27Ahmedabad21Jaipur17Pune16Karnataka11Cochin8Chandigarh7Nagpur6Guwahati5Rajkot5Patna4Surat3Lucknow3Orissa3Dehradun2Visakhapatnam1Cuttack1Raipur1Telangana1Hyderabad1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)16Section 153A8Addition to Income8Section 1324Section 153B4Section 234A4Section 153C4Capital Gains4Short Term Capital Gains

SRI.B.RAJAN,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ITO, WD-1(2), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 393/COCH/2019[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin04 Sept 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Mathew JosephFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153B

condone the delay and proceed to dispose off the appeals on merits. 3. Brief facts of the case are as follows:- The assessee is a individual. For the assessment years 2006-2007, 2007-2008, 2010 and 2010-2011, the assessee did not file the return of income because according to him, he was not having any taxable income. There

4
Unexplained Investment4
Search & Seizure4
Limitation/Time-bar4

SRI.B.RAJAN,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ITO, WD-1(2), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 396/COCH/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin04 Sept 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Mathew JosephFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153B

condone the delay and proceed to dispose off the appeals on merits. 3. Brief facts of the case are as follows:- The assessee is a individual. For the assessment years 2006-2007, 2007-2008, 2010 and 2010-2011, the assessee did not file the return of income because according to him, he was not having any taxable income. There

SRI.B.RAJAN,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ITO, WD-1(2), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 394/COCH/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin04 Sept 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Mathew JosephFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153B

condone the delay and proceed to dispose off the appeals on merits. 3. Brief facts of the case are as follows:- The assessee is a individual. For the assessment years 2006-2007, 2007-2008, 2010 and 2010-2011, the assessee did not file the return of income because according to him, he was not having any taxable income. There

SRI.B.RAJAN,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ITO, WD-1(2), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 395/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin04 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Mathew JosephFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153B

condone the delay and proceed to dispose off the appeals on merits. 3. Brief facts of the case are as follows:- The assessee is a individual. For the assessment years 2006-2007, 2007-2008, 2010 and 2010-2011, the assessee did not file the return of income because according to him, he was not having any taxable income. There

M/S SANTHIMADOM AYURNIKETHAN HEALTH RESORT & RESEARCH INSTITUTE TRUST,KOCHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE -2, KOCHI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 917/COCH/2022[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin02 May 2024AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal

For Appellant: Shri Mathew Joseph, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 153ASection 153CSection 234A

condoning the delay, admit the appeal for being decided on merits. 3. It was, at the outset, submitted by Shri Joseph, the learned counsel for the assessee, that only the grounds of appeal in relation to levy of interest u/ss. 234A and 234B of the Act are being pressed. And toward which he would take us through the appeal memo

M/S SANTHIMADOM AYURNIKETHAN HEALTH RESORT & RESEARCH INSTITUTE TRUST,KOCHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE -2, KOCHI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 919/COCH/2022[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin02 May 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal

For Appellant: Shri Mathew Joseph, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 153ASection 153CSection 234A

condoning the delay, admit the appeal for being decided on merits. 3. It was, at the outset, submitted by Shri Joseph, the learned counsel for the assessee, that only the grounds of appeal in relation to levy of interest u/ss. 234A and 234B of the Act are being pressed. And toward which he would take us through the appeal memo

M/S SANTHIMADOM AYURNIKETHAN HEALTH RESORT & RESEARCH INSTITUTE TRUST,KOCHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, KOCHI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 918/COCH/2022[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin02 May 2024AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal

For Appellant: Shri Mathew Joseph, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 153ASection 153CSection 234A

condoning the delay, admit the appeal for being decided on merits. 3. It was, at the outset, submitted by Shri Joseph, the learned counsel for the assessee, that only the grounds of appeal in relation to levy of interest u/ss. 234A and 234B of the Act are being pressed. And toward which he would take us through the appeal memo

M/S SANTHIMADOM AYURNIKETHAN HEALTH RESORT & RESEARCH INSTITUTE TRUST,ERNAKULAM vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, KOCHI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 916/COCH/2022[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin02 May 2024AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal

For Appellant: Shri Mathew Joseph, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 153ASection 153CSection 234A

condoning the delay, admit the appeal for being decided on merits. 3. It was, at the outset, submitted by Shri Joseph, the learned counsel for the assessee, that only the grounds of appeal in relation to levy of interest u/ss. 234A and 234B of the Act are being pressed. And toward which he would take us through the appeal memo