Search: condonation of delay

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 148Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 148A6 Section 1484 Section 80P4 Cash Deposit3 Addition to Income3 Section 132 Section 1472 Section 139(1)2 Section 80A2 Section 119(2)(b)

KOYILANDY TALUK GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY,KOZHIKODE vs. ITO,WARD 2(2), KOZHIKODE

ITA 217/COCH/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin12 Aug 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Sonjoy Sarma

Section 148A

Section 148A(b), making an addition of Rs. 57,76,285. 3. Aggrieved, the assessee filed an appeal before the Ld.CIT(A). However, due to non-compliance and absence during hearings, the appeal was decided ex parte, without affording an opportunity to the assessee to substantiate its claim. 4. The assessee has challenged the CIT(A)’s order before

THRISSUR VANITHA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD NO. R 1189,THIRUVAMBADY vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1), THRISSUR

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 721/COCH/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Nov 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am

KOYILANDY TALUK GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY,KOZHIKODE vs. ITO,WARD 2(2), KOZHIKODE

THRISSUR VANITHA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD NO. R 1189,THIRUVAMBADY vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1), THRISSUR

KOYILANDY TALUK GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY,KOZHIKODE vs. ITO,WARD 2(2), KOZHIKODE

THRISSUR VANITHA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD NO. R 1189,THIRUVAMBADY vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1), THRISSUR

THRISSUR VANITHA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD,PUNKUNNAM vs. ITO WARD 2(1), THRISSUR