BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

70 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 13(1)(c)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai1,332Delhi1,101Mumbai1,014Kolkata725Bangalore587Pune546Jaipur368Hyderabad327Ahmedabad320Karnataka219Chandigarh197Surat195Raipur154Visakhapatnam131Indore129Amritsar115Nagpur104Lucknow99Cuttack88Panaji83Rajkot77Cochin70SC49Calcutta46Patna39Guwahati26Telangana23Allahabad22Agra21Jodhpur18Dehradun17Varanasi16Jabalpur11Ranchi7Kerala5Orissa5A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Himachal Pradesh2Rajasthan2R.M. LODHA ANIL R. DAVE1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Andhra Pradesh1DIPAK MISRA R.K. AGRAWAL PRAFULLA C. PANT1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 80P59Section 234E40Section 143(3)33Addition to Income30Section 200A28Cash Deposit27Condonation of Delay25Demonetization21Limitation/Time-bar

M/S. PARAVUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK,KOLLAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeal and stay petition filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 767/COCH/2023[AY 2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Jul 2024

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Soundararajan K.Assessment Year: 2017-18

For Appellant: Sri Santosh P. Abraham, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, D.R
Section 250Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

c) Affidavit filed on behalf of the applicant was based on hearsay and no facts were true to the knowledge of the persons who filed the affidavit in support of the application for condonation of delay. It will be appropriate to refer to the findings recorded by the Ld. Tribunal in the impugned order, which reads as under: M/s. Paravur

Showing 1–20 of 70 · Page 1 of 4

21
Section 119
Section 139(1)18
Reassessment18

DCIT, TRIVANDRUM vs. BRAHMOS AEROSPACE( THIRUVANANTHAPURAM) LTD, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeal filedby

ITA 742/COCH/2019[2002-03]Status: HeardITAT Cochin23 Feb 2022AY 2002-03

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri Ramit Kochar, Am Deputy Commissioner Brahmos Aerospace Of Income Tax, (Thiruvananthapuram) Ltd., Circle-1(1), V. Chackai, Thiruvananthapuram Beach Post, Kerala Tiruvananthapuram, Kerala Pan – Aabck2217K Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Smt. Jamunna Devi, Sr.DRFor Respondent: Shri Abraham Joseph Markos, Adv
Section 139(1)Section 139(3)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 44ASection 80

condone the delay and treat the return as valid , even if the said defect is not rectified within the period stipulated by AO in its notice u/s 139(9) of the 1961 Act, but the said defect stood rectified before assessment is completed. It is admitted position that the AO did not issue any such notice

DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, THRISSUR vs. THE CSB BANK LTD, THRISSUR

In the result, the appeal of revenue is dismissed

ITA 542/COCH/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Oct 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Satish Modi, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT DR
Section 115Section 115JSection 144BSection 147Section 250

condone the delay of 60 days in filing the present appeal and proceed to examine the grounds raised in the present appeal. 2. The Revenue has raised following grounds of appeal : “1. The order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre [NFAC], New Delhi in DIN and Order No. DIN ITBA/APLS/S/250/2024-25/1074993866(1) dated 25.03.2025 against assessment

PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE KUNNAMANGALAM,KOZHIKODE vs. ITO, WARD TDS, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 761/COCH/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin07 Nov 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Richard Mathews, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R

13. It is no doubt true that while considering the application for condonation of delay, the expression ‘sufficient cause’ has to be liberally construed. It, however, does not mean that without making any sufficient cause, the Court will condone the delay regardless of the length of the delay. In the present case, the delay is of 12 years

PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE KUNNAMANGALAM,KOZHIKODE vs. ITO, WARD TDS, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 764/COCH/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin07 Nov 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Richard Mathews, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R

13. It is no doubt true that while considering the application for condonation of delay, the expression ‘sufficient cause’ has to be liberally construed. It, however, does not mean that without making any sufficient cause, the Court will condone the delay regardless of the length of the delay. In the present case, the delay is of 12 years

PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE KUNNAMANAGALAM KOZHIKODE,KOZHIKODE vs. ITO,WARD TDS, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 763/COCH/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin07 Nov 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Richard Mathews, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R

13. It is no doubt true that while considering the application for condonation of delay, the expression ‘sufficient cause’ has to be liberally construed. It, however, does not mean that without making any sufficient cause, the Court will condone the delay regardless of the length of the delay. In the present case, the delay is of 12 years

PRIMARY HEALTH CENTRE KUNNAMANGALAM KOZHIKODE,KOZHIKODE vs. ITO ,WARD TDS, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 762/COCH/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin07 Nov 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Richard Mathews, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R

13. It is no doubt true that while considering the application for condonation of delay, the expression ‘sufficient cause’ has to be liberally construed. It, however, does not mean that without making any sufficient cause, the Court will condone the delay regardless of the length of the delay. In the present case, the delay is of 12 years

KADUNGAMPARAMBIL MANUAL GEORGE JOSEPH,ERNAKULAM vs. ITO , NON CORPORATE WARD 2(4) & TPS, KOCHI

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 12/COCH/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin22 Aug 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Ms. Lakshmi, CAFor Respondent: Smt. V. Swarnalatha, Sr. D.R
Section 1Section 143(3)

13 13/Coch/2023 2015-16 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 143(3) r.w.s. 23/1046317013(1) 147 14 14/Coch/2023 2015-16 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 271B 23/1046317423(1) 15 15/Coch/2023 2015-16 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 271(1)(c) 23/1046317203(1) 16 16/Coch/2023 2017-18 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 271AAC1 23/1046338750(1) 17 17/Coch/2023 2017-18 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 270 23/1046339605(1) 18 2017-18 18/Coch/2023 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 143(3) 23/1046338190(1) Heard both parties at length. Case

KADUNGAMPARAMBIL MANUAL GEORGE JOSEPH,ERNAKULAM vs. ITO , NON CORPORATE WARD 2(4) & TPS, KOCHI

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 6/COCH/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin22 Aug 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Ms. Lakshmi, CAFor Respondent: Smt. V. Swarnalatha, Sr. D.R
Section 1Section 143(3)

13 13/Coch/2023 2015-16 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 143(3) r.w.s. 23/1046317013(1) 147 14 14/Coch/2023 2015-16 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 271B 23/1046317423(1) 15 15/Coch/2023 2015-16 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 271(1)(c) 23/1046317203(1) 16 16/Coch/2023 2017-18 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 271AAC1 23/1046338750(1) 17 17/Coch/2023 2017-18 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 270 23/1046339605(1) 18 2017-18 18/Coch/2023 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 143(3) 23/1046338190(1) Heard both parties at length. Case

KADUNGAMPARAMBIL MANUAL GEORGE JOSEPH,ERNAKULAM vs. ITO , NON CORPORATE WARD 2(4) & TPS, KOCHI

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 2/COCH/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin22 Aug 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Ms. Lakshmi, CAFor Respondent: Smt. V. Swarnalatha, Sr. D.R
Section 1Section 143(3)

13 13/Coch/2023 2015-16 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 143(3) r.w.s. 23/1046317013(1) 147 14 14/Coch/2023 2015-16 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 271B 23/1046317423(1) 15 15/Coch/2023 2015-16 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 271(1)(c) 23/1046317203(1) 16 16/Coch/2023 2017-18 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 271AAC1 23/1046338750(1) 17 17/Coch/2023 2017-18 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 270 23/1046339605(1) 18 2017-18 18/Coch/2023 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 143(3) 23/1046338190(1) Heard both parties at length. Case

KADUNGAMPARAMBIL MANUAL GEORGE JOSEPH,ERNAKULAM vs. ITO , NON CORPORATE WARD 2(4) & TPS, KOCHI

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 7/COCH/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin22 Aug 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Ms. Lakshmi, CAFor Respondent: Smt. V. Swarnalatha, Sr. D.R
Section 1Section 143(3)

13 13/Coch/2023 2015-16 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 143(3) r.w.s. 23/1046317013(1) 147 14 14/Coch/2023 2015-16 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 271B 23/1046317423(1) 15 15/Coch/2023 2015-16 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 271(1)(c) 23/1046317203(1) 16 16/Coch/2023 2017-18 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 271AAC1 23/1046338750(1) 17 17/Coch/2023 2017-18 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 270 23/1046339605(1) 18 2017-18 18/Coch/2023 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 143(3) 23/1046338190(1) Heard both parties at length. Case

KADUNGAMPARAMBIL MANUAL GEORGE JOSEPH,ERNAKULAM vs. ITO , NON CORPORATE WARD 2(4) & TPS, KOCHI

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 14/COCH/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin22 Aug 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Ms. Lakshmi, CAFor Respondent: Smt. V. Swarnalatha, Sr. D.R
Section 1Section 143(3)

13 13/Coch/2023 2015-16 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 143(3) r.w.s. 23/1046317013(1) 147 14 14/Coch/2023 2015-16 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 271B 23/1046317423(1) 15 15/Coch/2023 2015-16 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 271(1)(c) 23/1046317203(1) 16 16/Coch/2023 2017-18 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 271AAC1 23/1046338750(1) 17 17/Coch/2023 2017-18 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 270 23/1046339605(1) 18 2017-18 18/Coch/2023 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 143(3) 23/1046338190(1) Heard both parties at length. Case

KADUNGAMPARAMBIL MANUAL GEORGE JOSEPH,ERNAKULAM vs. ITO , NON CORPORATE WARD 2(4) & TPS, KOCHI

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 11/COCH/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin22 Aug 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Ms. Lakshmi, CAFor Respondent: Smt. V. Swarnalatha, Sr. D.R
Section 1Section 143(3)

13 13/Coch/2023 2015-16 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 143(3) r.w.s. 23/1046317013(1) 147 14 14/Coch/2023 2015-16 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 271B 23/1046317423(1) 15 15/Coch/2023 2015-16 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 271(1)(c) 23/1046317203(1) 16 16/Coch/2023 2017-18 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 271AAC1 23/1046338750(1) 17 17/Coch/2023 2017-18 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 270 23/1046339605(1) 18 2017-18 18/Coch/2023 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 143(3) 23/1046338190(1) Heard both parties at length. Case

KADUNGAMPARAMBIL MANUAL GEORGE JOSEPH,ERNAKULAM vs. ITO , NON CORPORATE WARD 2(4) & TPS, KOCHI

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 8/COCH/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin22 Aug 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Ms. Lakshmi, CAFor Respondent: Smt. V. Swarnalatha, Sr. D.R
Section 1Section 143(3)

13 13/Coch/2023 2015-16 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 143(3) r.w.s. 23/1046317013(1) 147 14 14/Coch/2023 2015-16 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 271B 23/1046317423(1) 15 15/Coch/2023 2015-16 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 271(1)(c) 23/1046317203(1) 16 16/Coch/2023 2017-18 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 271AAC1 23/1046338750(1) 17 17/Coch/2023 2017-18 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 270 23/1046339605(1) 18 2017-18 18/Coch/2023 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 143(3) 23/1046338190(1) Heard both parties at length. Case

KADUNGAMPARAMBIL MANUAL GEORGE JOSEPH,ERNAKULAM vs. ITO , NON CORPORATE WARD 2(4) & TPS, KOCHI

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 15/COCH/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin22 Aug 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Ms. Lakshmi, CAFor Respondent: Smt. V. Swarnalatha, Sr. D.R
Section 1Section 143(3)

13 13/Coch/2023 2015-16 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 143(3) r.w.s. 23/1046317013(1) 147 14 14/Coch/2023 2015-16 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 271B 23/1046317423(1) 15 15/Coch/2023 2015-16 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 271(1)(c) 23/1046317203(1) 16 16/Coch/2023 2017-18 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 271AAC1 23/1046338750(1) 17 17/Coch/2023 2017-18 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 270 23/1046339605(1) 18 2017-18 18/Coch/2023 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 143(3) 23/1046338190(1) Heard both parties at length. Case

KADUNGAMPARAMBIL MANUAL GEORGE JOSEPH,ERNAKULAM vs. ITO , NON CORPORATE WARD 2(4) & TPS, KOCHI

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 4/COCH/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin22 Aug 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Ms. Lakshmi, CAFor Respondent: Smt. V. Swarnalatha, Sr. D.R
Section 1Section 143(3)

13 13/Coch/2023 2015-16 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 143(3) r.w.s. 23/1046317013(1) 147 14 14/Coch/2023 2015-16 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 271B 23/1046317423(1) 15 15/Coch/2023 2015-16 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 271(1)(c) 23/1046317203(1) 16 16/Coch/2023 2017-18 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 271AAC1 23/1046338750(1) 17 17/Coch/2023 2017-18 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 270 23/1046339605(1) 18 2017-18 18/Coch/2023 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 143(3) 23/1046338190(1) Heard both parties at length. Case

KADUNGAMPARAMBIL MANUAL GEORGE JOSEPH,ERNAKULAM vs. ITO , NON CORPORATE WARD 2(4) & TPS, KOCHI

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 9/COCH/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin22 Aug 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Ms. Lakshmi, CAFor Respondent: Smt. V. Swarnalatha, Sr. D.R
Section 1Section 143(3)

13 13/Coch/2023 2015-16 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 143(3) r.w.s. 23/1046317013(1) 147 14 14/Coch/2023 2015-16 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 271B 23/1046317423(1) 15 15/Coch/2023 2015-16 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 271(1)(c) 23/1046317203(1) 16 16/Coch/2023 2017-18 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 271AAC1 23/1046338750(1) 17 17/Coch/2023 2017-18 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 270 23/1046339605(1) 18 2017-18 18/Coch/2023 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 143(3) 23/1046338190(1) Heard both parties at length. Case

KADUNGAMPARAMBIL MANUAL GEORGE JOSEPH,ERNAKULAM vs. ITO , NON CORPORATE WARD 2(4) & TPS, KOCHI

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 13/COCH/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin22 Aug 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Ms. Lakshmi, CAFor Respondent: Smt. V. Swarnalatha, Sr. D.R
Section 1Section 143(3)

13 13/Coch/2023 2015-16 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 143(3) r.w.s. 23/1046317013(1) 147 14 14/Coch/2023 2015-16 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 271B 23/1046317423(1) 15 15/Coch/2023 2015-16 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 271(1)(c) 23/1046317203(1) 16 16/Coch/2023 2017-18 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 271AAC1 23/1046338750(1) 17 17/Coch/2023 2017-18 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 270 23/1046339605(1) 18 2017-18 18/Coch/2023 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 143(3) 23/1046338190(1) Heard both parties at length. Case

KADUNGAMPARAMBIL MANUAL GEORGE JOSEPH,ERNAKULAM vs. ITO , NON CORPORATE WARD 2(4) & TPS, KOCHI

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 3/COCH/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin22 Aug 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Ms. Lakshmi, CAFor Respondent: Smt. V. Swarnalatha, Sr. D.R
Section 1Section 143(3)

13 13/Coch/2023 2015-16 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 143(3) r.w.s. 23/1046317013(1) 147 14 14/Coch/2023 2015-16 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 271B 23/1046317423(1) 15 15/Coch/2023 2015-16 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 271(1)(c) 23/1046317203(1) 16 16/Coch/2023 2017-18 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 271AAC1 23/1046338750(1) 17 17/Coch/2023 2017-18 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 270 23/1046339605(1) 18 2017-18 18/Coch/2023 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 143(3) 23/1046338190(1) Heard both parties at length. Case

KADUNGAMPARAMBIL MANUAL GEORGE JOSEPH,ERNAKULAM vs. ITO , NON CORPORATE WARD 2(4) & TPS, KOCHI

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 5/COCH/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin22 Aug 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Ms. Lakshmi, CAFor Respondent: Smt. V. Swarnalatha, Sr. D.R
Section 1Section 143(3)

13 13/Coch/2023 2015-16 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 143(3) r.w.s. 23/1046317013(1) 147 14 14/Coch/2023 2015-16 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 271B 23/1046317423(1) 15 15/Coch/2023 2015-16 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 271(1)(c) 23/1046317203(1) 16 16/Coch/2023 2017-18 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 271AAC1 23/1046338750(1) 17 17/Coch/2023 2017-18 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 270 23/1046339605(1) 18 2017-18 18/Coch/2023 ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022- 143(3) 23/1046338190(1) Heard both parties at length. Case