BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 108clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai178Mumbai170Karnataka122Delhi100Kolkata100Ahmedabad92Bangalore65Jaipur49Pune49Hyderabad48Calcutta38Chandigarh37Cuttack25Rajkot25Nagpur23Indore21Guwahati16Surat14Lucknow11Agra11Patna10Cochin9Raipur6SC5Jodhpur5Amritsar4Punjab & Haryana3Visakhapatnam2Jabalpur2Telangana2Orissa1Dehradun1Andhra Pradesh1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Varanasi1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Limitation/Time-bar6Addition to Income4Section 249(3)3Section 1483Condonation of Delay3Section 143(3)2Section 1472Section 133A2Section 263

M/S.KERALA MEDICAL SERVICES CORPN LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ITO, WD-1(4), TRIVANDRUM

The appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 107/COCH/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 May 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 249(3)

108 & 109/Coch/2019 Assessment Years : 2010-11 to 2012-13 Kerala Medical Services Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward- Corporation Ltd., 1(4), Trivandrum. Near W & C Hospital, Thycaud, Thiruvananthapuram-695 014. [PAN: AADCK 4029M] (Assessee-Appellant) (Revenue-Respondent) Assessee by Shri T.M. Sreedharan, Sr. Adv. Revenue by Smt. A.S. Bindhu, Sr. DR Date of hearing 14/05/2019 Date of pronouncement

M/S.KERALA MEDICAL SERVICES CORPN LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ITO, WD-1(4), TRIVANDRUM

The appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 108/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 May 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

2
Survey u/s 133A2
Section 249(3)

108 & 109/Coch/2019 Assessment Years : 2010-11 to 2012-13 Kerala Medical Services Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward- Corporation Ltd., 1(4), Trivandrum. Near W & C Hospital, Thycaud, Thiruvananthapuram-695 014. [PAN: AADCK 4029M] (Assessee-Appellant) (Revenue-Respondent) Assessee by Shri T.M. Sreedharan, Sr. Adv. Revenue by Smt. A.S. Bindhu, Sr. DR Date of hearing 14/05/2019 Date of pronouncement

M/S.KERALA MEDICAL SERVICES CORPN LTD,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ITO, WD-1(4), TRIVANDRUM

The appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 109/COCH/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 May 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 249(3)

108 & 109/Coch/2019 Assessment Years : 2010-11 to 2012-13 Kerala Medical Services Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward- Corporation Ltd., 1(4), Trivandrum. Near W & C Hospital, Thycaud, Thiruvananthapuram-695 014. [PAN: AADCK 4029M] (Assessee-Appellant) (Revenue-Respondent) Assessee by Shri T.M. Sreedharan, Sr. Adv. Revenue by Smt. A.S. Bindhu, Sr. DR Date of hearing 14/05/2019 Date of pronouncement

MARATH VELAYUDHAN JOSHY,TRICHUR vs. ITO, WARD 1(1), THRISSUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 395/COCH/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin22 Jul 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Sonjoy Sarma

Section 148

108 days in filing thepresent appeal before the Tribunal. The assessee has filed a condonationpetition explaining the reasons for such delay. After considering thesubmissions and materials on record, we are satisfied that there wasreasonable cause for the delay in filing the appeal. Accordingly, the delay of108 days is condoned, and the appeal is admitted for adjudication. 3. Brief facts

M/S.PIONEER MOTORS (KANNUR) P. LTD,KANNUR vs. THE DCIT,CIRCLE-2(1), KANNUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 440/COCH/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin02 Dec 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.T.M.Sreedharan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR
Section 143(3)

condone the delay of 33 days in filing this appeal and proceed to dispose of the same on merits. ITA No.440/Coch/2019. 2 M/s.Pioneer Motors (Kannur) Pvt. Ltd. 3. Three issues are raised for our consideration, namely (i) whether the CIT(A) has erred in confirming the disallowance of a sum of Rs.3 lakh being subvention expenses; (ii) whether

GOOD HOMES PVT LTD,KOCHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), KOCHI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 884/COCH/2022[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin11 Aug 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am &Shriabyt.Varkey, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.A.Gopalakrishnan, CAFor Respondent: Smt.J.M.Jamuna Devi, Sr.AR
Section 133ASection 147Section 148

section 147 r.w.s. 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter ‘the Act’) dated 18.3.2015 and 29.3.2014 for assessment year (AY) 2007-2008, respectively. The background facts of both the cases being same, these are heard together, and are being disposed of pera common, consolidated order for the sake of convenience. ITA Nos.870& 884 /Coch/2022 (AY 2007-08) Ajit

AJIT ASSOCIATES PRIVATE LIMITED,ERNAKULAM vs. JCIT, CORPORATE RANGE - 1, KOCHI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 870/COCH/2022[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin11 Aug 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am &Shriabyt.Varkey, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.A.Gopalakrishnan, CAFor Respondent: Smt.J.M.Jamuna Devi, Sr.AR
Section 133ASection 147Section 148

section 147 r.w.s. 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter ‘the Act’) dated 18.3.2015 and 29.3.2014 for assessment year (AY) 2007-2008, respectively. The background facts of both the cases being same, these are heard together, and are being disposed of pera common, consolidated order for the sake of convenience. ITA Nos.870& 884 /Coch/2022 (AY 2007-08) Ajit

CENTRAL MEDICAL STORES,VALANCHERY vs. THE ITO, TIRUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 97/COCH/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin25 Jul 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George George K. & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahum/S. Central Medical Store The Income Tax Officer Central Bazar, Valanchery Ward - 1, Tirur Vs. Tirur, Malapuram 679552 Malapuram 676101 Pan – Aaefc4396B Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri K. Kittu, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 234ASection 271(1)Section 274Section 44A

condone the delay. 4. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed the return of income on 13.03.2016 electronically disclosing total income of Rs.21,590/- The assessee is running a business in the name and style of M/s. Central Medical Stores which is a partnership firm with S/Shri K.P. Rayin Kutty Haji, K.P. Jamal Mohammed, K.P. Zakir

V GUARD INDUSTRIES LIMITED,VENNALA vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, KOCHI

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is partly allowed

ITA 63/COCH/2022[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Mar 2023AY 2016-2017

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Sandeep Gosainv-Guard Industries Ltd. Principal Cit-1, 42/962, Vennala High School C R Building, I S Press Road, Vs. Road, Vennala, Kochi 682018 Ernakulam 682028 [Pan: Aaacv5492Q] (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri Anil D. Nair, Advocate Respondent By: Shri Prashant V.K., Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 01.02.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 20.03.2023 O R D E R Per: Bench This Is An Appeal By The Assessee Challenging The Revision Of It’S Assessment Under Section 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘The Act’ Hereinafter) Dated 28/12/2018 For Assessment Year (Ay) 2016-17 By The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Kochi (‘Pr. Cit’ For Short) Vide Order U/S. 263 Dated 22/03/2021. 2. The Appeal, Filed On 08/03/2022, Though Delayed By 256 Days, Was Admitted In View Of The Blanket Condonation By The Apex Court In Suo Motu Wp(C) No.3/2020, Dated 10/01/2022, Excluding The Period From 15/3/2020 To 28/02/2022 In Reckoning The Delay In Computing Limitation Under Law & The Hearing Accordingly Proceeded With. The Assessee Is A Company Manufacturing Electrical Cables, Pumps, Solar Water Heaters, Etc. & Trading In Electrical & Electronic Goods. Revision Of It’S Impugned Assessment Is On Several Issues On Which The Revisionary Authority Found An Absence Or Lack Of Enquiry By The Assessing Officer

For Appellant: Shri Anil D. Nair, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Prashant V.K., CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 263

condonation by the Apex Court in Suo Motu WP(C) No.3/2020, dated 10/01/2022, excluding the period from 15/3/2020 to 28/02/2022 in reckoning the delay in computing limitation under law, and the hearing accordingly proceeded with. The assessee is a company manufacturing electrical cables, pumps, solar water heaters, etc., and trading in electrical and electronic goods. Revision of it’s impugned