BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

12 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 65clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka462Delhi373Mumbai230Chennai126Bangalore111Ahmedabad68Jaipur62Hyderabad59Chandigarh59Pune54Kolkata46Lucknow35Indore25Visakhapatnam19Calcutta16Cuttack15Amritsar14Agra14Rajkot13Cochin12Allahabad10Nagpur10Raipur9Surat9Telangana7Varanasi5Dehradun4Patna3Jabalpur3SC3Guwahati2Jodhpur2Rajasthan2Panaji1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 1133Section 2(15)16Section 12A12Exemption12Section 143(3)6Charitable Trust6Business Income5Section 11(1)4Section 34

M/S.BHARATHAKSHEMAM,THRISSUR vs. THE ITO, THRISSUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 590/COCH/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Jan 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm Assessment Year: 2012-13

Section 11Section 12ASection 13(1)(bb)Section 2(15)

charitable purpose, the last words in section 2(15) would have no application and the trust would be entitled to exemption. What these last concluding words require is not that the trust or institution, whose purpose is advancement of an object of general public utility, should not carry on any activity for profit at all but that the purpose

KATHIKODE CHARITABLE TRUST,THRISSUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER., THRISSUR

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes, and it’s stay petitions dismissed as infructuous

Section 143(1)4
Addition to Income4
Section 13(3)3
ITA 947/COCH/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin10 May 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal

For Appellant: Shri Jojo, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 11Section 11(1)(a)Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 2

section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act), raising demands, including interest, at Rs.28.47 lakhs and Rs.37.75 lakhs for the two consecutive years respectively. The assessee ITA Nos. 947 & 948/Coch/2022 (AY : 2014-15) Kathikode Charitable Trust v. ITO admittedly did not act thereon, stating that it was ‘awaiting’ – whatever that would mean; Sh. Jojo, the learned counsel

KATHIKODE CHARITABLE TRUST,THRISSUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, THRISSUR

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes, and it’s stay petitions dismissed as infructuous

ITA 948/COCH/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin10 May 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal

For Appellant: Shri Jojo, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 11Section 11(1)(a)Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 2

section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act), raising demands, including interest, at Rs.28.47 lakhs and Rs.37.75 lakhs for the two consecutive years respectively. The assessee ITA Nos. 947 & 948/Coch/2022 (AY : 2014-15) Kathikode Charitable Trust v. ITO admittedly did not act thereon, stating that it was ‘awaiting’ – whatever that would mean; Sh. Jojo, the learned counsel

THE DCIT, CALICUT vs. M/S.KUNHITHARUVAI MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST, CALICUT

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 336/COCH/2015[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin11 Sept 2017AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri George George K, Jm & Manjunath. G, Am The Dy Commr Of Income Tax Vs M/S Kunhitharuvai Memorial Central Circle Charitable Trust Kozhikode No.1 Mcc Cross Road Kozhikode 673 001 ( Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 11Section 12ASection 13(1)Section 13(1)(c)Section 13(3)Section 143(2)

Charitable Trust Kozhikode No.1 MCC Cross Road Kozhikode 673 001 ( Appellant) (Respondent) PAN No. AAATK4733C Assessee By Sh Surendranath Rao Revenue By Sh A Dhanaraj, Sr DR Date of Hearing 29th Aug 2017 Date of pronouncement 11th Sep2017 ORDER PER MANJUNATHA.G, AM: This appeal filed by the revenue is directed against the order of the CIT(A), Kozhikode

INFOPARKS KERALA,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE JT DIRECTOR OF IT (OSD) EXEM), COCHIN

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are partly allowed

ITA 75/COCH/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin11 Aug 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am & Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm

For Appellant: Sri. Rajakannan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr.AR
Section 11Section 11(1)Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 2(15)

trusts authorities, etc. may be involved in promoting public objects and also in the course of their pursuing their objects, involved or engaged in activities in the nature of trade, commerce or business. (iv) The determinative tests to consider when determining whether such statutory bodies, boards, authorities, corporations, autonomous or self-governing government sponsored bodies, are GPU category charities

INFOPARKS KERALA,COCHIN vs. THE ACIT, COCHIN

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are partly allowed

ITA 77/COCH/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin11 Aug 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am & Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm

For Appellant: Sri. Rajakannan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr.AR
Section 11Section 11(1)Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 2(15)

trusts authorities, etc. may be involved in promoting public objects and also in the course of their pursuing their objects, involved or engaged in activities in the nature of trade, commerce or business. (iv) The determinative tests to consider when determining whether such statutory bodies, boards, authorities, corporations, autonomous or self-governing government sponsored bodies, are GPU category charities

INFOPARKS KERALA,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE JT DIRECTOR OF IT (OSD) EXEM), COCHIN

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are partly allowed

ITA 76/COCH/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin11 Aug 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am & Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm

For Appellant: Sri. Rajakannan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr.AR
Section 11Section 11(1)Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 2(15)

trusts authorities, etc. may be involved in promoting public objects and also in the course of their pursuing their objects, involved or engaged in activities in the nature of trade, commerce or business. (iv) The determinative tests to consider when determining whether such statutory bodies, boards, authorities, corporations, autonomous or self-governing government sponsored bodies, are GPU category charities

.SHALOM CHARITABLE MINISTRIES OF INDIA,PALAKKAD vs. THE ACIT, PALAKKAD

In the result, the appeals as well as stay applications filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 644/COCH/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin05 Mar 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Shivadas Chettoor, FCAFor Respondent: Sri.Sudhanshu Shekhar Jha, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 2(15)

65 : "180. 'Charitable purpose' includes relief of the poor, education, medical relief and any other object of general public utility. These activities are tax exempt, as they should be. However, some entities carrying on regular trade, commerce or business or providing services in relation to any trade, commerce or business and earning incomes have sought to claim that their purposes

SHALOM CHARITABLE MINISTRIES OF INDIA,PALAKKAD vs. THE ACIT, PALAKKAD

In the result, the appeals as well as stay applications filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 645/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin05 Mar 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Shivadas Chettoor, FCAFor Respondent: Sri.Sudhanshu Shekhar Jha, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 2(15)

65 : "180. 'Charitable purpose' includes relief of the poor, education, medical relief and any other object of general public utility. These activities are tax exempt, as they should be. However, some entities carrying on regular trade, commerce or business or providing services in relation to any trade, commerce or business and earning incomes have sought to claim that their purposes

CARMEL CONVENT ,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. ITO EXEMPTION WARD, TRIVANDRAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is partly allowed and partly allowed for statistical purposes, and it’s stay petition is dismissed

ITA 689/COCH/2022[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin07 Mar 2024AY 2016-2017

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Dr. Seethalakshmi

For Appellant: Shri Anil D. Nair, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 11(1)Section 11(1)(d)Section 12ASection 143(3)

charitable or religious purposes. 11. (1) Subject to the provisions of sections 60 to 63, the following income shall not be included in the total income of the previous year of the person in receipt of the income— (a) ------------------------ (b) ------------------------ (c) ------------------------- (d) income in the form of voluntary contributions made with a specific direction that they shall form part

THE GREATER COCHIN DEV. AUTHORITY,COCHIN vs. THE ACIT (EXEMPTION), COCHIN

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 177/COCH/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin01 Mar 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri Sebi George, CAFor Respondent: Sri. A.Dhanaraj, Sr.DR
Section 10Section 10(20)Section 11Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 3Section 5Section 53

Trust registered u/s 12A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It is an authority constituted by the Government of Kerala for planning and development of Greater Cochin area. For the A.Ys 2011-2012 and 2012-2013, the return of income was filed after claiming exemption u/s ITA No.177 & 178/Coch/2017. 2 The Greater Cochin Dev. Authority. 11 of the I.T.Act

THE GREATER COCHIN DEV. AUTHORITY,COCHIN vs. THE ACIT (EXEMPTION), COCHIN

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 178/COCH/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin01 Mar 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri Sebi George, CAFor Respondent: Sri. A.Dhanaraj, Sr.DR
Section 10Section 10(20)Section 11Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 3Section 5Section 53

Trust registered u/s 12A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It is an authority constituted by the Government of Kerala for planning and development of Greater Cochin area. For the A.Ys 2011-2012 and 2012-2013, the return of income was filed after claiming exemption u/s ITA No.177 & 178/Coch/2017. 2 The Greater Cochin Dev. Authority. 11 of the I.T.Act