Search: charitable trust

KIZHAKKE KOVILAKOM TRUST,MALAPPURAM vs. THE CIT (EXEMPTION), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 474/COCH/2023[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin02 Dec 2024AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K.Assessment Year : 2023-24

For Appellant: Shri Suresh Kumar Varma, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR

charitable trust to another trust which carried out repair and renovation of Lord Vishnu's temple did not disentitle the petitioner-trust from renewal of its exemption certificate under section 80G. The repair and renovation of the temple did not necessarily mean that the expenditure in question was for a particular religion only. All people who have faith In Lord

M/S.KUNHITHARUVAI MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST,CALICUT vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE-2, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are disposed of as follows:

ITA 260/COCH/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 May 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 10ASection 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 13Section 13(1)(c)Section 132Section 139(1)Section 153A

25 I.T.A. Nos.255-261/Coch/2018 charitable purpose of advancement of education, and not to earn profit. In fact, no profit has been established to have been earned by the assessee. The CIT has failed to specify as to how profit earning is the predominant activity of the assessee instead of carrying out its said charitable purpose. On the other hand, the assessee

M/S.KUNHITHARUVAI MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST,CALICUT vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE-2, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are disposed of as follows:

ITA 258/COCH/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 May 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 10ASection 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 13Section 13(1)(c)Section 132Section 139(1)Section 153A

25 I.T.A. Nos.255-261/Coch/2018 charitable purpose of advancement of education, and not to earn profit. In fact, no profit has been established to have been earned by the assessee. The CIT has failed to specify as to how profit earning is the predominant activity of the assessee instead of carrying out its said charitable purpose. On the other hand, the assessee

M/S.KUNHITHARUVAI MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST,CALICUT vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE-2, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are disposed of as follows:

ITA 257/COCH/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 May 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 10ASection 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 13Section 13(1)(c)Section 132Section 139(1)Section 153A

25 I.T.A. Nos.255-261/Coch/2018 charitable purpose of advancement of education, and not to earn profit. In fact, no profit has been established to have been earned by the assessee. The CIT has failed to specify as to how profit earning is the predominant activity of the assessee instead of carrying out its said charitable purpose. On the other hand, the assessee

M/S.KUNHITHARUVAI MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST,CALICUT vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE-2, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are disposed of as follows:

ITA 256/COCH/2018[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 May 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 10ASection 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 13Section 13(1)(c)Section 132Section 139(1)Section 153A

25 I.T.A. Nos.255-261/Coch/2018 charitable purpose of advancement of education, and not to earn profit. In fact, no profit has been established to have been earned by the assessee. The CIT has failed to specify as to how profit earning is the predominant activity of the assessee instead of carrying out its said charitable purpose. On the other hand, the assessee

M/S.KUNHITHARUVAI MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST,CALICUT vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE-2, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are disposed of as follows:

ITA 255/COCH/2018[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 May 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 10ASection 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 13Section 13(1)(c)Section 132Section 139(1)Section 153A

25 I.T.A. Nos.255-261/Coch/2018 charitable purpose of advancement of education, and not to earn profit. In fact, no profit has been established to have been earned by the assessee. The CIT has failed to specify as to how profit earning is the predominant activity of the assessee instead of carrying out its said charitable purpose. On the other hand, the assessee

M/S.KUNHITHARUVAI MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST,CALICUT vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE-2, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are disposed of as follows:

ITA 261/COCH/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 May 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 10ASection 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 13Section 13(1)(c)Section 132Section 139(1)Section 153A

25 I.T.A. Nos.255-261/Coch/2018 charitable purpose of advancement of education, and not to earn profit. In fact, no profit has been established to have been earned by the assessee. The CIT has failed to specify as to how profit earning is the predominant activity of the assessee instead of carrying out its said charitable purpose. On the other hand, the assessee

M/S.KUNHITHARUVAI MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST,CALICUT vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE-2, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are disposed of as follows:

ITA 259/COCH/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 May 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 10ASection 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 13Section 13(1)(c)Section 132Section 139(1)Section 153A

25 I.T.A. Nos.255-261/Coch/2018 charitable purpose of advancement of education, and not to earn profit. In fact, no profit has been established to have been earned by the assessee. The CIT has failed to specify as to how profit earning is the predominant activity of the assessee instead of carrying out its said charitable purpose. On the other hand, the assessee

M/S.BHARATHAKSHEMAM,THRISSUR vs. THE ITO, THRISSUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 590/COCH/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Jan 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm Assessment Year: 2012-13

Section 11Section 12ASection 13(1)(bb)Section 2(15)

charitable purpose, the last words in section 2(15) would have no application and the trust would be entitled to exemption. What these last concluding words require is not that the trust or institution, whose purpose is advancement of an object of general public utility, should not carry on any activity for profit at all but that the purpose

ARVIND CHARITABLE TRUST,TRIVANDRUM vs. ITO, WARD-1(1), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 301/COCH/2024[AY 2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Mar 2025

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Sri.Arun Raj S, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt.Leena Lal, Sr.AR

Section 12ASection 143Section 143(1)Section 154

section 154 of the IT 3 ITA No.301/Coch/2024. Arvind Charitable Trust. Act was issued rectifying the order dated 17-9-2018 and erroneously making the addition treating the corpus fund of Rs 61,25

MONKOMBU AUNDI IYER EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST,IDUKKI vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTION, KOCHI, KOCHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 911/COCH/2024[2025-2026]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin06 Aug 2025AY 2025-2026

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Sonjoy Sarma

Section 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 13(1)(d)Section 2(15)Section 80G

charitable trust duly registered under section 12AA of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and had been granted approval under section 80G up to the assessment year 2021–22. The assessee sought renewal of approval under section 80G from 01.04.2021 and accordingly filed an application. Provisional approval was granted in Form No. 10AC, effective from 04.04.2022 to A.Y. 2024–25

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT,CEN- CIRCLE,, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 306/COCH/2019[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

section 55 of the Act. 11.3 The contention of the Ld. DR is that a person appointed as a trustee in a public charitable trust shall not acquire any legal or actionable right over the property owned by the trust which is solely held for attainment of the objective, charitable purpose. The Ld. DR submitted that the trusteeship

MRS.GRACY BABU,ADOOR P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 210/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

section 55 of the Act. 11.3 The contention of the Ld. DR is that a person appointed as a trustee in a public charitable trust shall not acquire any legal or actionable right over the property owned by the trust which is solely held for attainment of the objective, charitable purpose. The Ld. DR submitted that the trusteeship

THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM vs. SRI.JOSE THOMAS, ADOOR

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 238/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

section 55 of the Act. 11.3 The contention of the Ld. DR is that a person appointed as a trustee in a public charitable trust shall not acquire any legal or actionable right over the property owned by the trust which is solely held for attainment of the objective, charitable purpose. The Ld. DR submitted that the trusteeship

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 29/COCH/2019[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

section 55 of the Act. 11.3 The contention of the Ld. DR is that a person appointed as a trustee in a public charitable trust shall not acquire any legal or actionable right over the property owned by the trust which is solely held for attainment of the objective, charitable purpose. The Ld. DR submitted that the trusteeship

SMT.GRACY BABU,ADOOR P.O. vs. THE DCIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 33/COCH/2019[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

section 55 of the Act. 11.3 The contention of the Ld. DR is that a person appointed as a trustee in a public charitable trust shall not acquire any legal or actionable right over the property owned by the trust which is solely held for attainment of the objective, charitable purpose. The Ld. DR submitted that the trusteeship

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE ACIT,CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 213/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

section 55 of the Act. 11.3 The contention of the Ld. DR is that a person appointed as a trustee in a public charitable trust shall not acquire any legal or actionable right over the property owned by the trust which is solely held for attainment of the objective, charitable purpose. The Ld. DR submitted that the trusteeship

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 30/COCH/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

section 55 of the Act. 11.3 The contention of the Ld. DR is that a person appointed as a trustee in a public charitable trust shall not acquire any legal or actionable right over the property owned by the trust which is solely held for attainment of the objective, charitable purpose. The Ld. DR submitted that the trusteeship

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 304/COCH/2019[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

section 55 of the Act. 11.3 The contention of the Ld. DR is that a person appointed as a trustee in a public charitable trust shall not acquire any legal or actionable right over the property owned by the trust which is solely held for attainment of the objective, charitable purpose. The Ld. DR submitted that the trusteeship

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT,CEN- CIRCLE,, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 308/COCH/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

section 55 of the Act. 11.3 The contention of the Ld. DR is that a person appointed as a trustee in a public charitable trust shall not acquire any legal or actionable right over the property owned by the trust which is solely held for attainment of the objective, charitable purpose. The Ld. DR submitted that the trusteeship