BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 160clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka427Delhi163Mumbai87Ahmedabad57Bangalore50Chennai44Jaipur35Allahabad26Chandigarh23Pune17Calcutta16Visakhapatnam13Lucknow12Rajkot9Indore7Kolkata6Hyderabad4Jodhpur3Cuttack3Telangana3Patna3Nagpur2Cochin2SC2Raipur2Rajasthan2Agra1Andhra Pradesh1Punjab & Haryana1Surat1

Key Topics

Section 2(15)16Section 2634Section 114Section 12A2Section 143(2)2Section 143(1)2Exemption2

MALANADU MILK PRODUCERS SOCIETY,KOTTAYAM vs. DCIT, EXEMPTION, TVM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

The appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 633/COCH/2022[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Mar 2023AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri George George K. & Ms. Padmavathy S.

For Appellant: Shri Jose Kappan, CAFor Respondent: Shri Prashant V.K., CIT(DR)
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 2(15)Section 263

trust. The assessee further submitted that the proviso to section 2(15) is not applicable to the assessee since the object of the assessee is not “advancement of any other object of general public utility”, but for the specific purpose of benefit of small and marginal farmers. The assessee relied on Circular No.11/2008 dated 19.12.2000 in this regard

MALANADU FARMERS SOCIETY ,KOTTAYAM vs. DCIT EXEMPTIONS, TVM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

The appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 632/COCH/2022[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Mar 2023AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri George George K. & Ms. Padmavathy S.

For Appellant: Shri Jose Kappan, CAFor Respondent: Shri Prashant V.K., CIT(DR)
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 2(15)Section 263

trust. The assessee further submitted that the proviso to section 2(15) is not applicable to the assessee since the object of the assessee is not “advancement of any other object of general public utility”, but for the specific purpose of benefit of small and marginal farmers. The assessee relied on Circular No.11/2008 dated 19.12.2000 in this regard