KATHIKODE CHARITABLE TRUST,THRISSUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, THRISSUR
In the result, the assessee’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes, and it’s stay petitions dismissed as infructuous
ITA 948/COCH/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin10 May 2024AY 2015-16
Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal
For Appellant: Shri Jojo, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 11Section 11(1)(a)Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 2
section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act), raising demands, including interest, at Rs.28.47
lakhs and Rs.37.75 lakhs for the two consecutive years respectively. The assessee
ITA Nos. 947 & 948/Coch/2022 (AY : 2014-15)
Kathikode Charitable Trust v. ITO admittedly did not act thereon, stating that it was ‘awaiting’ – whatever that would mean; Sh. Jojo, the learned counsel
