BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

13 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 12(1)(ac)clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka366Mumbai173Pune132Delhi111Ahmedabad103Jaipur88Hyderabad86Chennai62Rajkot59Bangalore56Surat41Kolkata39Amritsar31Chandigarh29Calcutta16Nagpur15Cochin13Visakhapatnam10Jodhpur10Panaji9Telangana8Agra8Cuttack7Indore7Lucknow5Patna5Raipur5Varanasi4SC4Dehradun3Ranchi3Rajasthan2Punjab & Haryana2Jabalpur2Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 12A40Section 1116Section 80G16Section 12A(1)(ac)13Section 1313Exemption13Section 80G(5)10Charitable Trust9Section 13(3)7

SREE DHARMA SASTHA HARIHARA SEVA CHARITABLE TEMPLE TRUST,ERUMELY vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 61/COCH/2024[2023-24 to 2027-28]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin09 Dec 2024

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Soundrarajan K., Jm

For Appellant: ------- None -------For Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 13Section 13(1)(b)

1)(ac)(iii) for regularisation of 12A registration on 23.05.2023. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) refused to grant registration u/s. 12A of the Act solely on the ground mainly because the appellant trust is providing food to Sabarimala pilgrims by holding that the appellant trust is a religious trust. Even otherwise there is no bar under the statute that

Section 13(1)(b)4
Search & Seizure4
Rectification u/s 1543

SREE DHARMA SASTHA HARIHARA SEVA CHARITABLE TEMPLE TRUST,ERUMELY vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 62/COCH/2024[Not Applicable]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin09 Dec 2024

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Soundrarajan K., Jm

For Appellant: ------- None -------For Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 13Section 13(1)(b)

1)(ac)(iii) for regularisation of 12A registration on 23.05.2023. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) refused to grant registration u/s. 12A of the Act solely on the ground mainly because the appellant trust is providing food to Sabarimala pilgrims by holding that the appellant trust is a religious trust. Even otherwise there is no bar under the statute that

LAST HOUR MINISTRY,THIRUVALLA vs. ACIT(EXEMPTION), KOCHI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees stand allowed

ITA 12/COCH/2021[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin04 Aug 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

For Appellant: Shri B. Ramakrishnan, &For Respondent: Smt. Veni Raj, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 13Section 132

charitable in nature and benefit that trustees were getting could not be a sole reason to cancel registration of trust, cancellation of registration of assessee to be quashed. ➤ Hon'ble ITAT, Mumbai Bench A in the case of Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) 1, Mumbai in [2019] 108 taxmann.com 272 (Mumbai - Trib.) wherein

LOVE INDIA MINISTRIES,THIRUVALLA vs. THE DCIT(EXEMPTION), KOCHI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees stand allowed

ITA 13/COCH/2021[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin04 Aug 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

For Appellant: Shri B. Ramakrishnan, &For Respondent: Smt. Veni Raj, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 13Section 132

charitable in nature and benefit that trustees were getting could not be a sole reason to cancel registration of trust, cancellation of registration of assessee to be quashed. ➤ Hon'ble ITAT, Mumbai Bench A in the case of Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) 1, Mumbai in [2019] 108 taxmann.com 272 (Mumbai - Trib.) wherein

M/S.BELIEVERS EASTERN CHURCH,THIRUVALLA vs. THE CIT (EXEMPTION), KOCHI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees stand allowed

ITA 15/COCH/2021[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin04 Aug 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

For Appellant: Shri B. Ramakrishnan, &For Respondent: Smt. Veni Raj, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 13Section 132

charitable in nature and benefit that trustees were getting could not be a sole reason to cancel registration of trust, cancellation of registration of assessee to be quashed. ➤ Hon'ble ITAT, Mumbai Bench A in the case of Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) 1, Mumbai in [2019] 108 taxmann.com 272 (Mumbai - Trib.) wherein

AYANA CHARITABLE TRUST,THIRUVALLA vs. DCIT(EXEMPTION), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees stand allowed

ITA 14/COCH/2021[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin04 Aug 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

For Appellant: Shri B. Ramakrishnan, &For Respondent: Smt. Veni Raj, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 13Section 132

charitable in nature and benefit that trustees were getting could not be a sole reason to cancel registration of trust, cancellation of registration of assessee to be quashed. ➤ Hon'ble ITAT, Mumbai Bench A in the case of Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) 1, Mumbai in [2019] 108 taxmann.com 272 (Mumbai - Trib.) wherein

NAUGHTYS PET SANCTUARY,KERALA vs. CIT( EXEMPTION), KOCHI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 543/COCH/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin24 Apr 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO (Accountant Member), SHRI KESHAV DUBEY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Jain, A.RFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 13Section 13(3)

section 13(3) of the Act. And that hence the application filed in form IOAB under section12A (1) (ac) (iii) is liable for rejection" The applicant was asked to file its objections if any on or before 26th Feb 2024. 12. The Appellant field its objections with the office the CIT (exemption)— KOCHI vide letter dated 22nd Feb 2024 filed

VISWAPRAKASH EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST,TRIVANDRUM vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), KOCHI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee stand partly allowed

ITA 1054/COCH/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin22 May 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Prakash Chand Yadav, Jm Viswaprakash Educational & Charitable Trust .......... Appellant Vellayambalam, Sasthamangalam P.O. Thiruvananthapuram 695003 [Pan: Aabtv8227D] Jbs Memorial Educational & Charitable .......... Appellant Society Mount Carmal Church, Mariapuram, Neyyattinkara, Thiruvananthapuram 695003 [Pan: Aafaj6296F] St. Antonys Forance Church .......... Appellant Kattakode, Kattakada, Thiruvananthapuram 695003 [Pan: Aatts7537F] Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption) .......... Respondent Aayakar Bavan, Old Rly. Station Road, Ernakulam Appellant By: Shri Arun Raj S., Advocate Respondent By: Smt. Veni Raj, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 20.05.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 22.05.2025

For Appellant: Shri Arun Raj S., AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Veni Raj, CIT-DR
Section 12(1)(ac)Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

charitable trust found with the object of imparting education. The appellant had applied for provisional approval/registration u/s. 12(1)(ac) of the Act on 31.03.2021 and provisional registration was granted on 27.05.2021. The appellant trust applied for regular registration u/s. 12A of the Act on 28.03.2024 in Form 10B. However, while submitting the application in Form 10B wrong sub-clause

JBS MEMORIAL EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE SOCIETY,TRIVANDRUM vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), KOCHI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee stand partly allowed

ITA 1055/COCH/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin22 May 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Prakash Chand Yadav, Jm Viswaprakash Educational & Charitable Trust .......... Appellant Vellayambalam, Sasthamangalam P.O. Thiruvananthapuram 695003 [Pan: Aabtv8227D] Jbs Memorial Educational & Charitable .......... Appellant Society Mount Carmal Church, Mariapuram, Neyyattinkara, Thiruvananthapuram 695003 [Pan: Aafaj6296F] St. Antonys Forance Church .......... Appellant Kattakode, Kattakada, Thiruvananthapuram 695003 [Pan: Aatts7537F] Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption) .......... Respondent Aayakar Bavan, Old Rly. Station Road, Ernakulam Appellant By: Shri Arun Raj S., Advocate Respondent By: Smt. Veni Raj, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 20.05.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 22.05.2025

For Appellant: Shri Arun Raj S., AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Veni Raj, CIT-DR
Section 12(1)(ac)Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

charitable trust found with the object of imparting education. The appellant had applied for provisional approval/registration u/s. 12(1)(ac) of the Act on 31.03.2021 and provisional registration was granted on 27.05.2021. The appellant trust applied for regular registration u/s. 12A of the Act on 28.03.2024 in Form 10B. However, while submitting the application in Form 10B wrong sub-clause

ST.ANTONYS FRANCE CHURC,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), KOCHI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee stand partly allowed

ITA 1056/COCH/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin22 May 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Prakash Chand Yadav, Jm Viswaprakash Educational & Charitable Trust .......... Appellant Vellayambalam, Sasthamangalam P.O. Thiruvananthapuram 695003 [Pan: Aabtv8227D] Jbs Memorial Educational & Charitable .......... Appellant Society Mount Carmal Church, Mariapuram, Neyyattinkara, Thiruvananthapuram 695003 [Pan: Aafaj6296F] St. Antonys Forance Church .......... Appellant Kattakode, Kattakada, Thiruvananthapuram 695003 [Pan: Aatts7537F] Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption) .......... Respondent Aayakar Bavan, Old Rly. Station Road, Ernakulam Appellant By: Shri Arun Raj S., Advocate Respondent By: Smt. Veni Raj, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 20.05.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 22.05.2025

For Appellant: Shri Arun Raj S., AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Veni Raj, CIT-DR
Section 12(1)(ac)Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

charitable trust found with the object of imparting education. The appellant had applied for provisional approval/registration u/s. 12(1)(ac) of the Act on 31.03.2021 and provisional registration was granted on 27.05.2021. The appellant trust applied for regular registration u/s. 12A of the Act on 28.03.2024 in Form 10B. However, while submitting the application in Form 10B wrong sub-clause

SANATANA DHARMA EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL SOCIETY,ALAPPUZHA vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), KOCHI, KOCHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 278/COCH/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin25 Sept 2024AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Respondent: Shri Dr. S. Pandian, CIT-DR
Section 12A(1)(ac)Section 80GSection 80G(5)

ac) of the Act dated 30.01.2019.(copy filed by assessee in the paper book). 4. Thus, the only limited question before us is whether the application of the assessee was time barred or not? To decide this question, we have to first understand the relevant statutory provisions of the Income Tax Act. 4.1 The relevant part of Section

SANATANA DHARMA VIDYASALA,ALAPPUZHA vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), KOCHI, KOCHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 279/COCH/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin25 Sept 2024AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Respondent: Shri Dr. S. Pandian, CIT-DR
Section 12A(1)(ac)Section 80GSection 80G(5)

ac) of the Act dated 30.01.2019.(copy filed by assessee in the paper book). 4. Thus, the only limited question before us is whether the application of the assessee was time barred or not? To decide this question, we have to first understand the relevant statutory provisions of the Income Tax Act. 4.1 The relevant part of Section

KERALA STATE EX SERVICEMEN DEVELOPMENT AND REHABILITATION CORPORATION,TRIVANDRUM vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 420/COCH/2024[2024-2025]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin10 Jun 2025AY 2024-2025

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Soundararajan K.Assessment Year : Na

For Appellant: None
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 2(15)Section 215Section 25

1)(ac)(iii) of the Act. Along with the application, the assessee furnished all the necessary details. The Ld.CIT(E) without considering the fact that the assessee is doing the charitable activities, had rejected the application because the providing employment to Ex-Servicemen will not come under the charitable activities defined u/s. 2(15) of the Act. As against