BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

15 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 10(34)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi484Mumbai418Chennai221Bangalore182Pune96Jaipur88Hyderabad83Karnataka66Kolkata59Surat49Ahmedabad45Lucknow44Chandigarh39Allahabad31Indore29Jodhpur23Visakhapatnam18Calcutta17Amritsar16Cochin15Panaji14Agra11Telangana10Rajkot9SC8Nagpur8Raipur7Cuttack6Kerala5Dehradun3Rajasthan3Patna2Orissa2Andhra Pradesh2Punjab & Haryana1T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Jabalpur1Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 12A36Section 1118Exemption15Section 80G13Charitable Trust13Section 80G(5)8Section 2638Section 143(1)7Section 143(3)7

LAST HOUR MINISTRY,THIRUVALLA vs. ACIT(EXEMPTION), KOCHI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees stand allowed

ITA 12/COCH/2021[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin04 Aug 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

For Appellant: Shri B. Ramakrishnan, &For Respondent: Smt. Veni Raj, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 13Section 132

34 of 2023 vide order dated 03/03/2025. 3. Since identical facts and issues involved in all these appeals, theses appeals were heard together and disposed of vide this common order. 4. For the sake of convenience and clarify, the facts relevant to the ITA No. 12/Coch/2021 in the case of Last House Ministry are stated herein

M/S.BELIEVERS EASTERN CHURCH,THIRUVALLA vs. THE CIT (EXEMPTION), KOCHI

Section 11(1)5
Addition to Income5
Search & Seizure4

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees stand allowed

ITA 15/COCH/2021[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin04 Aug 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

For Appellant: Shri B. Ramakrishnan, &For Respondent: Smt. Veni Raj, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 13Section 132

34 of 2023 vide order dated 03/03/2025. 3. Since identical facts and issues involved in all these appeals, theses appeals were heard together and disposed of vide this common order. 4. For the sake of convenience and clarify, the facts relevant to the ITA No. 12/Coch/2021 in the case of Last House Ministry are stated herein

AYANA CHARITABLE TRUST,THIRUVALLA vs. DCIT(EXEMPTION), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees stand allowed

ITA 14/COCH/2021[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin04 Aug 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

For Appellant: Shri B. Ramakrishnan, &For Respondent: Smt. Veni Raj, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 13Section 132

34 of 2023 vide order dated 03/03/2025. 3. Since identical facts and issues involved in all these appeals, theses appeals were heard together and disposed of vide this common order. 4. For the sake of convenience and clarify, the facts relevant to the ITA No. 12/Coch/2021 in the case of Last House Ministry are stated herein

LOVE INDIA MINISTRIES,THIRUVALLA vs. THE DCIT(EXEMPTION), KOCHI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees stand allowed

ITA 13/COCH/2021[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin04 Aug 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

For Appellant: Shri B. Ramakrishnan, &For Respondent: Smt. Veni Raj, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 13Section 132

34 of 2023 vide order dated 03/03/2025. 3. Since identical facts and issues involved in all these appeals, theses appeals were heard together and disposed of vide this common order. 4. For the sake of convenience and clarify, the facts relevant to the ITA No. 12/Coch/2021 in the case of Last House Ministry are stated herein

KATHIKODE CHARITABLE TRUST,THRISSUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, THRISSUR

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes, and it’s stay petitions dismissed as infructuous

ITA 948/COCH/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin10 May 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal

For Appellant: Shri Jojo, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 11Section 11(1)(a)Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 2

section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act), raising demands, including interest, at Rs.28.47 lakhs and Rs.37.75 lakhs for the two consecutive years respectively. The assessee ITA Nos. 947 & 948/Coch/2022 (AY : 2014-15) Kathikode Charitable Trust v. ITO admittedly did not act thereon, stating that it was ‘awaiting’ – whatever that would mean; Sh. Jojo, the learned counsel

KATHIKODE CHARITABLE TRUST,THRISSUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER., THRISSUR

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes, and it’s stay petitions dismissed as infructuous

ITA 947/COCH/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin10 May 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal

For Appellant: Shri Jojo, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 11Section 11(1)(a)Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 2

section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act), raising demands, including interest, at Rs.28.47 lakhs and Rs.37.75 lakhs for the two consecutive years respectively. The assessee ITA Nos. 947 & 948/Coch/2022 (AY : 2014-15) Kathikode Charitable Trust v. ITO admittedly did not act thereon, stating that it was ‘awaiting’ – whatever that would mean; Sh. Jojo, the learned counsel

SREE ANJANEYA MEDICAL TRUST,KOZHIKODE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 2 (1), KOZHIKODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 205/COCH/2024[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Oct 2024AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K.Sree Anjaneya Medical Trust Acit, Circle - 2 17/501X-1, Kanchas Building Aayakar Bhavan Opp. Indoor Stadium Mananachira Vs. Rajaji Road, New Bus Stand Kozhikode 673001 Kozhikode 673004 [Pan: Aahts3844B] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Surendranath Rao, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Girly Albert, Sr. D.R
Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(2)Section 147Section 2

10. Coming to fact of the case on hand, we from the orders of the authorities below and materials available on record, note that the assessee has made an application for registration under section 12AA of the Act dated 12- 12-2008 which was granted in the year 2008 w.e.f. A.Y. 2009-10 as per the direction

GAJANANA CHARITABLE TRUST,KANHANGAD vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 354/COCH/2024[2024-2025]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 Sept 2024AY 2024-2025

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K.Gajanana Charitable Trust Cit (Exemption) 2Nd/686, Gajanana Aayakar Bhaval Opp. Head Post Office Vs. Old Rly Station Road Hosdurg, Kanhangad 671315 Ernakulam 682018 [Pan: Aabtg6555F] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri K. Suresh Kumar Varma, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 80Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iv)

10-11- 2023] dealt with the issue of clause-(iii) 3rd proviso u/s 80G(5) of the Act stating that "whichever is earlier" is applicable only to the newly constructed trust. The findings of the Co-ordinate Bench in the case of Bhamashah Sundarlal Daga Charitable Trust (supra) is reproduced below: "10.1 In this background, we need to read

INFOPARKS KERALA,COCHIN vs. THE ACIT, COCHIN

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are partly allowed

ITA 77/COCH/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin11 Aug 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am & Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm

For Appellant: Sri. Rajakannan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr.AR
Section 11Section 11(1)Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 2(15)

trusts authorities, etc. may be involved in promoting public objects and also in the course of their pursuing their objects, involved or engaged in activities in the nature of trade, commerce or business. (iv) The determinative tests to consider when determining whether such statutory bodies, boards, authorities, corporations, autonomous or self-governing government sponsored bodies, are GPU category charities

INFOPARKS KERALA,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE JT DIRECTOR OF IT (OSD) EXEM), COCHIN

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are partly allowed

ITA 75/COCH/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin11 Aug 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am & Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm

For Appellant: Sri. Rajakannan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr.AR
Section 11Section 11(1)Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 2(15)

trusts authorities, etc. may be involved in promoting public objects and also in the course of their pursuing their objects, involved or engaged in activities in the nature of trade, commerce or business. (iv) The determinative tests to consider when determining whether such statutory bodies, boards, authorities, corporations, autonomous or self-governing government sponsored bodies, are GPU category charities

INFOPARKS KERALA,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE JT DIRECTOR OF IT (OSD) EXEM), COCHIN

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are partly allowed

ITA 76/COCH/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin11 Aug 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am & Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm

For Appellant: Sri. Rajakannan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr.AR
Section 11Section 11(1)Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 2(15)

trusts authorities, etc. may be involved in promoting public objects and also in the course of their pursuing their objects, involved or engaged in activities in the nature of trade, commerce or business. (iv) The determinative tests to consider when determining whether such statutory bodies, boards, authorities, corporations, autonomous or self-governing government sponsored bodies, are GPU category charities

GEEVARGHESE YOHANNAN CHARITABLE TRUST,TRIVANDRUM vs. CIT EXEMPTIONS , KOCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 295/COCH/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed, Accountantmemberand Shri Soundararajan K., Judicialmember Geevarghese Yohannan Charitable Cit(Exemption) 2Nd Floor, San Juan Towers Trust 12-H Capitol Centre, Statue Vs. Old Rly. Station Road Thiruvananthapuram 605001 Kochi 682018 [Pan: Aabtg3042K] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Surendranath Rao, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 115BSection 143(3)Section 263Section 69C

10. Moving further, on a perusal of the notice issued u/s 263 of the Act, we note that there is no whisper about non-verification of application of expenditures which are revenue in nature. Therefore, we hold that the CIT(E) u/s 263 of the Act has exceeded his jurisdiction by widening the scope of the issue raised

SRI BHUVANENDRA EDUCATION TRUST,KANHANGAD vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 352/COCH/2024[2024-2025]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 Sept 2024AY 2024-2025

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K.Sri Bhuvanendra Education Trust Cit (Exemption) 2Nd/686, Gajanana Aayakar Bhaval Opp. Head Post Office Vs. Old Rly Station Road Hosdurg, Kanhangad 671315 Ernakulam 682018 [Pan: Aakts8046E] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri K. Suresh Kumar Varma, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 5Section 80Section 80GSection 80G(5)

10-11- 2023] dealt with the issue of clause-(iii) 3rd proviso u/s 80G(5) of the Act stating that "whichever is earlier" is applicable only to the newly constructed trust. The findings of the Co-ordinate Bench in the case of Bhamashah Sundarlal Daga Charitable Trust (supra) is reproduced below: "10.1 In this background, we need to read

THE NEHRU MEMORIAL EDUCATION SOCIETY,KANHANGAD vs. ITO EXEMPTIONS, KANNUR

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 159/COCH/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin07 Mar 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Dr. S. Seethalakshmithe Nehru Memorial The Income Tax Officer Education Society (Exemptions), Kannur Lakshmi Nivas Vs. Kanhangad - 671315 Kasaragod [Pan:Aabtt0633M] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri P.M. Veeramani, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 10Section 11(1)Section 11(1)(d)Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 154Section 2

charitable purposes [cl.(iia)]. The second aspect of the matter is if, as claimed, the entire gross receipt can be brought to tax, which can, by definition, only extend to income, i.e., net of expenditure there-against. A perusal of the Income & Expenditure Account for the year reveals the assessee to have in fact incurred an excess expenditure over income

VADAKKE MADHAM BRAHMASWOM,THRISSUR vs. THE ITO, EXEMPTION WARD, THRISSUR, THRISSUR

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is partly allowed

ITA 839/COCH/2022[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin28 Aug 2023AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am &Shrimanomohan Das, Jm

For Appellant: Ms. Preetha Nair, AdvFor Respondent: Ms. J. M. Jamuna Devi, SR. DR
Section 11(1)(a)Section 11(1)(d)Section 12(1)Section 143(3)

section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (`the Act’ hereinafter) dated 10.12.2019 for assessment year (AY) 2017-2018 by the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (NAFC) vide it’s order dated 30.05.2022. 2. The appeal raises a single issue, i.e., whether the corpus donation received by the assessee-trust qualifies to be so, so that