Search: charitable trust | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

188 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 1clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,973 Delhi1,621 Chennai1,123 Ahmedabad845 Bangalore816 Pune771 Karnataka619 Kolkata479 Jaipur472 Hyderabad286 Surat227 Chandigarh213 Cochin188 Amritsar163 Rajkot150 Indore148 Lucknow137 Cuttack126 Visakhapatnam109 Nagpur105 Agra65 Allahabad57 Raipur55 Jodhpur54 Patna52 Calcutta41 Telangana39 Ranchi32 SC25 Panaji23 Dehradun22 Jabalpur19 Varanasi19 Guwahati16 Kerala13 Rajasthan10 Punjab & Haryana9 Orissa6 Andhra Pradesh2 Himachal Pradesh2 T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1 J&K1

Key Topics

Section 12A139 Section 11102 Exemption62 Addition to Income53 Section 2(15)43 Charitable Trust36 Section 139(1)35 Section 26334 Section 143(3)31

KIZHAKKE KOVILAKOM TRUST,MALAPPURAM vs. THE CIT (EXEMPTION), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 474/COCH/2023[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin02 Dec 2024AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K.Assessment Year : 2023-24

For Appellant: Shri Suresh Kumar Varma, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR

Section 12ASection 80G(5)(vi)

section 13(1)(b) of the Act applies only to charitable trust and charitable institution and if the trust was charitable

SREE DHARMA SASTHA HARIHARA SEVA CHARITABLE TEMPLE TRUST,ERUMELY vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Showing 1–20 of 188 · Page 1 of 10

...

Condonation of Delay14

ITA 61/COCH/2024[2023-24 to 2027-28]Status: Disposed

ITAT Cochin

09 Dec 2024

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Soundrarajan K., Jm

For Appellant: ------- None -------For Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR

Section 11Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 13Section 13(1)(b)

section 13(1)(b) of the Act applies only to charitable trust and charitable institution and if the trust was charitable

SREE DHARMA SASTHA HARIHARA SEVA CHARITABLE TEMPLE TRUST,ERUMELY vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 62/COCH/2024[Not Applicable]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin09 Dec 2024

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Soundrarajan K., Jm

For Appellant: ------- None -------For Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR

Section 11Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 13Section 13(1)(b)

section 13(1)(b) of the Act applies only to charitable trust and charitable institution and if the trust was charitable

LOVE INDIA MINISTRIES,THIRUVALLA vs. THE DCIT(EXEMPTION), KOCHI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees stand allowed

ITA 13/COCH/2021[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin04 Aug 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

For Appellant: Shri B. Ramakrishnan, &For Respondent: Smt. Veni Raj, CIT-DR

Section 11Section 12ASection 13Section 132

section 12A(a) on grounds that activities of trust were not genuine and property and income of trust had been used for personal benefits of trustees, since activities of trust were charitable in nature and benefit that trustees were getting could not be a sole reason to cancel registration of trust, cancellation of registration of assessee to be quashed

AYANA CHARITABLE TRUST,THIRUVALLA vs. DCIT(EXEMPTION), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees stand allowed

ITA 14/COCH/2021[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin04 Aug 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

For Appellant: Shri B. Ramakrishnan, &For Respondent: Smt. Veni Raj, CIT-DR

Section 11Section 12ASection 13Section 132

section 12A(a) on grounds that activities of trust were not genuine and property and income of trust had been used for personal benefits of trustees, since activities of trust were charitable in nature and benefit that trustees were getting could not be a sole reason to cancel registration of trust, cancellation of registration of assessee to be quashed

LAST HOUR MINISTRY,THIRUVALLA vs. ACIT(EXEMPTION), KOCHI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees stand allowed

ITA 12/COCH/2021[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin04 Aug 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

For Appellant: Shri B. Ramakrishnan, &For Respondent: Smt. Veni Raj, CIT-DR

Section 11Section 12ASection 13Section 132

section 12A(a) on grounds that activities of trust were not genuine and property and income of trust had been used for personal benefits of trustees, since activities of trust were charitable in nature and benefit that trustees were getting could not be a sole reason to cancel registration of trust, cancellation of registration of assessee to be quashed

M/S.BELIEVERS EASTERN CHURCH,THIRUVALLA vs. THE CIT (EXEMPTION), KOCHI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees stand allowed

ITA 15/COCH/2021[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin04 Aug 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

For Appellant: Shri B. Ramakrishnan, &For Respondent: Smt. Veni Raj, CIT-DR

Section 11Section 12ASection 13Section 132

section 12A(a) on grounds that activities of trust were not genuine and property and income of trust had been used for personal benefits of trustees, since activities of trust were charitable in nature and benefit that trustees were getting could not be a sole reason to cancel registration of trust, cancellation of registration of assessee to be quashed

M/S.KUNHITHARUVAI MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST,CALICUT vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE-2, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are disposed of as follows:

ITA 260/COCH/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 May 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 10ASection 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 13Section 13(1)(c)Section 132Section 139(1)Section 153A

1) Pinegrove International Charitable Trust vs. Union of India & Others (327 ITR 63) (P&H). 4 I.T.A. Nos.255-261/Coch/2018 2) Vanitha Vishram Trust vs. Chief CIT (327 ITR 121 (Bombay). 5.3 The Ld. AR submitted that even if there is the violation of sections

M/S.KUNHITHARUVAI MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST,CALICUT vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE-2, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are disposed of as follows:

ITA 258/COCH/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 May 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 10ASection 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 13Section 13(1)(c)Section 132Section 139(1)Section 153A

1) Pinegrove International Charitable Trust vs. Union of India & Others (327 ITR 63) (P&H). 4 I.T.A. Nos.255-261/Coch/2018 2) Vanitha Vishram Trust vs. Chief CIT (327 ITR 121 (Bombay). 5.3 The Ld. AR submitted that even if there is the violation of sections

M/S.KUNHITHARUVAI MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST,CALICUT vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE-2, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are disposed of as follows:

ITA 261/COCH/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 May 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 10ASection 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 13Section 13(1)(c)Section 132Section 139(1)Section 153A

1) Pinegrove International Charitable Trust vs. Union of India & Others (327 ITR 63) (P&H). 4 I.T.A. Nos.255-261/Coch/2018 2) Vanitha Vishram Trust vs. Chief CIT (327 ITR 121 (Bombay). 5.3 The Ld. AR submitted that even if there is the violation of sections

M/S.KUNHITHARUVAI MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST,CALICUT vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE-2, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are disposed of as follows:

ITA 259/COCH/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 May 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 10ASection 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 13Section 13(1)(c)Section 132Section 139(1)Section 153A

1) Pinegrove International Charitable Trust vs. Union of India & Others (327 ITR 63) (P&H). 4 I.T.A. Nos.255-261/Coch/2018 2) Vanitha Vishram Trust vs. Chief CIT (327 ITR 121 (Bombay). 5.3 The Ld. AR submitted that even if there is the violation of sections

M/S.KUNHITHARUVAI MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST,CALICUT vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE-2, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are disposed of as follows:

ITA 257/COCH/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 May 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 10ASection 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 13Section 13(1)(c)Section 132Section 139(1)Section 153A

1) Pinegrove International Charitable Trust vs. Union of India & Others (327 ITR 63) (P&H). 4 I.T.A. Nos.255-261/Coch/2018 2) Vanitha Vishram Trust vs. Chief CIT (327 ITR 121 (Bombay). 5.3 The Ld. AR submitted that even if there is the violation of sections

M/S.KUNHITHARUVAI MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST,CALICUT vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE-2, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are disposed of as follows:

ITA 256/COCH/2018[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 May 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 10ASection 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 13Section 13(1)(c)Section 132Section 139(1)Section 153A

1) Pinegrove International Charitable Trust vs. Union of India & Others (327 ITR 63) (P&H). 4 I.T.A. Nos.255-261/Coch/2018 2) Vanitha Vishram Trust vs. Chief CIT (327 ITR 121 (Bombay). 5.3 The Ld. AR submitted that even if there is the violation of sections

M/S.KUNHITHARUVAI MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST,CALICUT vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE-2, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are disposed of as follows:

ITA 255/COCH/2018[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 May 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 10ASection 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 13Section 13(1)(c)Section 132Section 139(1)Section 153A

1) Pinegrove International Charitable Trust vs. Union of India & Others (327 ITR 63) (P&H). 4 I.T.A. Nos.255-261/Coch/2018 2) Vanitha Vishram Trust vs. Chief CIT (327 ITR 121 (Bombay). 5.3 The Ld. AR submitted that even if there is the violation of sections

M/S. LOVE IN ACTION SOCIETY,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ITO (EXEMPTION), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 459/COCH/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin04 Feb 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.Sameer Kapoor, CAFor Respondent: Sri.Sudhansu Shekhar Jha, DR

Section 11(1)(d)Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 263

section did not either by implication, or overtly or otherwise, enjoin upon the trust that the trustee shall retain it for ever as corpus, even if when 13 M/s.Love in Action Society. an occasion arises that in order to keep the trust alive and to prevent it from failure, it should not spend any amount

VISHWAKARMA EDUCATIONAL TRUST,TRIVANDRUM vs. DCIT , EXEMPTION CIRCLE, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 901/COCH/2022[2018-19]Status: HeardITAT Cochin11 Oct 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Dasvishwakarma Dy. Cit (Exemptions) Educational Trust Aayakar Bhavan 14, Ulloor Lane Peroorkada Road, Kowdiar Vs. Dpi Junction, Jagathy Thiruvananthapuram 695003 Trivandurm 695014 [Pan:Aaatv1824D] (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Smt. Parvathy Ammal, Ca Revenue By: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing: 12.09.2023 Date Of Pronouncement:11.10.2023 O R D E R Per Sanjay Arora, Am This Is An Appeal By The Assessee Agitating The Dismissal Of It’S Appeal Contesting The Processing Of It’S Return Of Income Under Section 143(1) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter ‘The Act’) Dated 30.10.2019 For Assessment Year (Ay) 2018-19,By The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Income Tax Department (Nfac, Delhi) [Cit(A)] Vide Order Dated 25.7.2022. 2. The Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee, A Charitable Trust Registered U/S. 12Aa Of The Act, Filed It’S Return Of Income For The Relevant Year On 28.8.2018 Declaring Nil Income, I.E., Claiming Exemption U/S. 11 On The Entirety Of It’S Income. The Same Was Processed U/S.143(1)(A) Of The Act, Denying It The Benefit Of Section 11 Of The Act, I.E., At An Income Of Rs. 13,34,692. The Denial Of Exemption Was For The Reason Of Non-Audit Of It’S Accounts And, Consequently, Non-Filing Of The Audit Report, Required To Be Filed In The Prescribed Form (Form 10B), Along With The Return Of

For Appellant: Smt. Parvathy Ammal, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R

Section 11Section 11(1)(a)Section 11(1)(d)Section 12Section 12(1)Section 12ASection 12A(1)(b)Section 139Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)

Section 12(1) of the Act, which deems voluntary contributions received by a Trust as income derived from a property held under trust, excludes corpus donations covered u/s. 11(1)(d) of the Act. The same is, therefore, not required to be, for availing exemption u/s. 11 of the Act, applied for charitable

M/S.BHARATHAKSHEMAM,THRISSUR vs. THE ITO, THRISSUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 590/COCH/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Jan 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm Assessment Year: 2012-13

Section 11Section 12ASection 13(1)(bb)Section 2(15)

charitable activities which in no way would mean that the business or trade was carried out for advancement of general public utility. According to the CIT(A), Section 11 (4A) substituted w.e.f. 1-4-1992 makes it amply clear that subsection (1) or sub-section (2) or section (3) or sub-section (3A) shall not apply in relation

DCIT, TRIVANDRUM vs. ST. JOSEPHS PROVINCE, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 442/COCH/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Aug 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Soundararajan K., Jm

For Appellant: ------- None -------For Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR

Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(1)(b)Section 13Section 13(9)Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 21A

1) of section 139 for furnishing the return of income for the said previous year. 10. From a reading of the order of the CIT(A) it would manifest that the CIT(A) had granted exemption u/s. 11 by holding that provisions of sub-section (9) of section 13 are not applicable to religious charitable trusts

DCIT, TRIVANDRUM vs. ST JOSEPHS PROVINCE, TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stand partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 443/COCH/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Aug 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Soundararajan K., Jm

For Appellant: ------- None -------For Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR

Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(1)(b)Section 13Section 13(9)Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 21A

1) of section 139 for furnishing the return of income for the said previous year. 10. From a reading of the order of the CIT(A) it would manifest that the CIT(A) had granted exemption u/s. 11 by holding that provisions of sub-section (9) of section 13 are not applicable to religious charitable trusts

ARVIND CHARITABLE TRUST,TRIVANDRUM vs. ITO, WARD-1(1), TRIVANDRUM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 301/COCH/2024[AY 2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Mar 2025

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Sri.Arun Raj S, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt.Leena Lal, Sr.AR

Section 12ASection 143Section 143(1)Section 154

section 143(1) r.w.s 154 of the IT Act is beyond the scope of 143(1) proceedings. 2 ITA No.301/Coch/2024. Arvind Charitable Trust