BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

31 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 02clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai289Delhi195Chennai128Bangalore119Jaipur89Karnataka86Ahmedabad81Kolkata64Hyderabad62Pune51Surat37Chandigarh32Cochin31Lucknow29Cuttack26Calcutta16Indore14Amritsar10Rajkot8Visakhapatnam7Allahabad6Nagpur5Raipur5Rajasthan3Ranchi3Agra2Jabalpur2Dehradun2SC2Jodhpur2Telangana2Varanasi2Guwahati1

Key Topics

Addition to Income25Section 80P14Section 2(15)9Section 12A8Exemption7Section 80P(4)6Section 143(3)5Section 115Section 80G(5)(vi)5

KIZHAKKE KOVILAKOM TRUST,MALAPPURAM vs. THE CIT (EXEMPTION), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 474/COCH/2023[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin02 Dec 2024AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K.Assessment Year : 2023-24

For Appellant: Shri Suresh Kumar Varma, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 12ASection 80G(5)(vi)

02-12-2024 ORDER PER SOUNDARARAJAN K., JUDICIAL MEMBER This is an appeal filed by the assessee challenging the order of the Ld.CIT(E), Kochi dated 12/05/2023 in which the Ld.CIT(E) had rejected the application filed by the assessee trust for granting approval u/s. 80G(5)(vi) of the Act. 2. The brief facts of the case are that

MRS.GRACY BABU,ADOOR P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

Showing 1–20 of 31 · Page 1 of 2

Charitable Trust5
Section 80P(2)(a)4
Deduction3
ITA 210/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

charitable trust which was charged under the head “other sources”and also ignoring the expenses incurred. 12.1 The facts of the case are that the agreement dated 10/03/2009 has provided payments in relation to ongoing construction in the college building which is payable on completion, out of Rs.37.50 crores. A sum of Rs.34 lakhs each had been paid to GracyBabu

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE ACIT,CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 213/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

charitable trust which was charged under the head “other sources”and also ignoring the expenses incurred. 12.1 The facts of the case are that the agreement dated 10/03/2009 has provided payments in relation to ongoing construction in the college building which is payable on completion, out of Rs.37.50 crores. A sum of Rs.34 lakhs each had been paid to GracyBabu

THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM vs. SRI.JOSE THOMAS, ADOOR

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 238/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

charitable trust which was charged under the head “other sources”and also ignoring the expenses incurred. 12.1 The facts of the case are that the agreement dated 10/03/2009 has provided payments in relation to ongoing construction in the college building which is payable on completion, out of Rs.37.50 crores. A sum of Rs.34 lakhs each had been paid to GracyBabu

THE ACIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM vs. SMT.GRACY BABU, ADOOR P.O.

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 239/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

charitable trust which was charged under the head “other sources”and also ignoring the expenses incurred. 12.1 The facts of the case are that the agreement dated 10/03/2009 has provided payments in relation to ongoing construction in the college building which is payable on completion, out of Rs.37.50 crores. A sum of Rs.34 lakhs each had been paid to GracyBabu

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 29/COCH/2019[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

charitable trust which was charged under the head “other sources”and also ignoring the expenses incurred. 12.1 The facts of the case are that the agreement dated 10/03/2009 has provided payments in relation to ongoing construction in the college building which is payable on completion, out of Rs.37.50 crores. A sum of Rs.34 lakhs each had been paid to GracyBabu

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 304/COCH/2019[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

charitable trust which was charged under the head “other sources”and also ignoring the expenses incurred. 12.1 The facts of the case are that the agreement dated 10/03/2009 has provided payments in relation to ongoing construction in the college building which is payable on completion, out of Rs.37.50 crores. A sum of Rs.34 lakhs each had been paid to GracyBabu

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT,CEN- CIRCLE,, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 306/COCH/2019[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

charitable trust which was charged under the head “other sources”and also ignoring the expenses incurred. 12.1 The facts of the case are that the agreement dated 10/03/2009 has provided payments in relation to ongoing construction in the college building which is payable on completion, out of Rs.37.50 crores. A sum of Rs.34 lakhs each had been paid to GracyBabu

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT,CEN- CIRCLE,, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 309/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

charitable trust which was charged under the head “other sources”and also ignoring the expenses incurred. 12.1 The facts of the case are that the agreement dated 10/03/2009 has provided payments in relation to ongoing construction in the college building which is payable on completion, out of Rs.37.50 crores. A sum of Rs.34 lakhs each had been paid to GracyBabu

SMT.GRACY BABU,ADOOR P.O. vs. THE DCIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 33/COCH/2019[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

charitable trust which was charged under the head “other sources”and also ignoring the expenses incurred. 12.1 The facts of the case are that the agreement dated 10/03/2009 has provided payments in relation to ongoing construction in the college building which is payable on completion, out of Rs.37.50 crores. A sum of Rs.34 lakhs each had been paid to GracyBabu

SMT.GRACY BABU,ADOOR P.O. vs. THE DCIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 34/COCH/2019[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

charitable trust which was charged under the head “other sources”and also ignoring the expenses incurred. 12.1 The facts of the case are that the agreement dated 10/03/2009 has provided payments in relation to ongoing construction in the college building which is payable on completion, out of Rs.37.50 crores. A sum of Rs.34 lakhs each had been paid to GracyBabu

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 27/COCH/2019[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

charitable trust which was charged under the head “other sources”and also ignoring the expenses incurred. 12.1 The facts of the case are that the agreement dated 10/03/2009 has provided payments in relation to ongoing construction in the college building which is payable on completion, out of Rs.37.50 crores. A sum of Rs.34 lakhs each had been paid to GracyBabu

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 28/COCH/2019[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

charitable trust which was charged under the head “other sources”and also ignoring the expenses incurred. 12.1 The facts of the case are that the agreement dated 10/03/2009 has provided payments in relation to ongoing construction in the college building which is payable on completion, out of Rs.37.50 crores. A sum of Rs.34 lakhs each had been paid to GracyBabu

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 30/COCH/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

charitable trust which was charged under the head “other sources”and also ignoring the expenses incurred. 12.1 The facts of the case are that the agreement dated 10/03/2009 has provided payments in relation to ongoing construction in the college building which is payable on completion, out of Rs.37.50 crores. A sum of Rs.34 lakhs each had been paid to GracyBabu

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT,CEN- CIRCLE,, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 305/COCH/2019[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

charitable trust which was charged under the head “other sources”and also ignoring the expenses incurred. 12.1 The facts of the case are that the agreement dated 10/03/2009 has provided payments in relation to ongoing construction in the college building which is payable on completion, out of Rs.37.50 crores. A sum of Rs.34 lakhs each had been paid to GracyBabu

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT,CEN- CIRCLE,, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 308/COCH/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

charitable trust which was charged under the head “other sources”and also ignoring the expenses incurred. 12.1 The facts of the case are that the agreement dated 10/03/2009 has provided payments in relation to ongoing construction in the college building which is payable on completion, out of Rs.37.50 crores. A sum of Rs.34 lakhs each had been paid to GracyBabu

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 31/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

charitable trust which was charged under the head “other sources”and also ignoring the expenses incurred. 12.1 The facts of the case are that the agreement dated 10/03/2009 has provided payments in relation to ongoing construction in the college building which is payable on completion, out of Rs.37.50 crores. A sum of Rs.34 lakhs each had been paid to GracyBabu

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT,CEN- CIRCLE,, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 310/COCH/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

charitable trust which was charged under the head “other sources”and also ignoring the expenses incurred. 12.1 The facts of the case are that the agreement dated 10/03/2009 has provided payments in relation to ongoing construction in the college building which is payable on completion, out of Rs.37.50 crores. A sum of Rs.34 lakhs each had been paid to GracyBabu

SMT.GRACY BABU,ADOOR P.O. vs. THE DCIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 32/COCH/2019[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

charitable trust which was charged under the head “other sources”and also ignoring the expenses incurred. 12.1 The facts of the case are that the agreement dated 10/03/2009 has provided payments in relation to ongoing construction in the college building which is payable on completion, out of Rs.37.50 crores. A sum of Rs.34 lakhs each had been paid to GracyBabu

SMT.GRACY BABU,ADOOR P.O. vs. THE DCIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 35/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

charitable trust which was charged under the head “other sources”and also ignoring the expenses incurred. 12.1 The facts of the case are that the agreement dated 10/03/2009 has provided payments in relation to ongoing construction in the college building which is payable on completion, out of Rs.37.50 crores. A sum of Rs.34 lakhs each had been paid to GracyBabu