BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

32 results for “charitable trust”+ Penaltyclear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka269Chennai187Mumbai186Delhi177Bangalore115Hyderabad80Ahmedabad77Pune64Jaipur55Chandigarh40Allahabad33Cochin32Kolkata29Lucknow24Indore16Visakhapatnam15Amritsar11Nagpur10Rajkot10Jodhpur9Cuttack8Raipur7Guwahati7Surat6SC6Agra4Patna4Telangana4Varanasi4Dehradun1Kerala1Rajasthan1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Penalty28Addition to Income25Section 23024Section 271(1)(c)18Section 13218Condonation of Delay18Exemption14Section 249(2)12Section 14412Section 153A

ST JOSEPHS EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST,KOTTAYAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXEMPTION WARD), KOTTAYAM, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 640/COCH/2025[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin31 Oct 2025AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Anikesh Banerjee, Jm

For Appellant: Shri P.V. Chacko, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 12ASection 139(1)Section 147Section 148Section 272A(2)(e)

penalty. 6. Being aggrieved, the appellant is in appeal before this Tribunal in the present appeal. 7. The learned counsel for the assessee submits that for the year under consideration filing of return of income u/s. 139(1) was not St. Josephs Eucational and Charitable Trust

Showing 1–20 of 32 · Page 1 of 2

12
Section 27112
Section 17912

SHALOM CHARITABLE MINISTRIES OF INDIA,PALAKKAD vs. ITO (EXEMPTION), THRISSUR

ITA 545/COCH/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin10 Sept 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO (Accountant Member), SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. DR
Section 12A(1)(b)Section 14Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 44A

charitable trust. Vide Order, dated 08/06/2017, penalty of INR.18,74,916/- was levied upon the Assessee under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act in respect

SHALOM CHARITABLE MINISTRIES OF INDIA,PALAKKAD vs. ITO (EXEMPTION), THRISSUR

ITA 548/COCH/2025[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin10 Sept 2025AY 2007-08

Bench: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO (Accountant Member), SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. DR
Section 12A(1)(b)Section 14Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 44A

charitable trust. Vide Order, dated 08/06/2017, penalty of INR.18,74,916/- was levied upon the Assessee under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act in respect

RAJAGIRI EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST,RAJAGIRI,KALAMASSERY vs. ITO EXEMPTION CIRCLE, KOCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 500/COCH/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 Aug 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Soundararajan K., Jm Assessment Year: 2012-13 Rajagiri Educational & Charitable Trust .......... Appellant Rajagiri, Kalamassery 683104 [Pan: Aaatr5410K] Vs. Ito (Exemption Circle), Kochi .......... Respondent Assessee By: Shri C.J. Romid, Ca Revenue By: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing: 05.08.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 14.08.2025

For Appellant: Shri C.J. Romid, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)

penalty order should be set aside. The above contention of the appellant remained uncontroverted by the learned Sr. DR. In the circumstance, we remand the matter back to the file of the AO for fresh disposal in accordance with law after furnishing a copy of the assessment order to the assessee. 3 Rajagiri Educational & Charitable Trust

ST JOSEPHS EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST,KOTTAYAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXEMPTION WARD), KOTTAYAM, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 641/COCH/2025[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin31 Oct 2025AY 2015-2016
For Appellant: \nShri P.V. Chacko, CAFor Respondent: \nSmt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 12ASection 139(1)Section 147Section 148Section 272A(2)(e)

charitable trust, did not file a return of income under section 139(1) for AY 2014-15, but filed one in response to a notice under section 148. The assessment resulted in Nil income. A penalty

SHALOM CHARITABLE MINISTRIES OF INDIA,PALAKKAD vs. ITO (EXEMPTION), THRISSUR

In the result, the appeal preferred by the Assessee as well as stay application is dismissed

ITA 544/COCH/2025[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin22 Aug 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. DR
Section 250Section 271BSection 44A

charitable trust. Vide Order, dated 08/06/2017, penalty of INR.1,00,000/- was levied on the Assessee under section 271B of the Act on account

KERALA BEEDI AND CIGAR WORKERS WELFARE FUND BOARD,KANNUR vs. ITO,EXEMPTION WARD , KANNUR

In the result, both the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

ITA 668/COCH/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Nov 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: BEFORESHRI. INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBERAND SHRI. ANIKESH BANERJEE (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri V M Veeramani, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Leena Lal, (SR.AR.)
Section 11Section 12ASection 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 270A

Charitable Trust v. Income-tax Officer reported in [2025] 171 taxmann.com 466 (Chennai - Trib.)held where assessee-trust, initially mentioned Rs. 71.77 lakhs instead of Nil under section 11(1)(2) and later filed a revised audit report and claimed repayment of loan as application of income, since assessee’s claim was supported by audited financials, revised audit report, revised

KERALA BEEDI AND CIGAR WORKERS WELFARE FUND BOARD,KANNUR vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT

In the result, both the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

ITA 659/COCH/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Nov 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: BEFORESHRI. INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBERAND SHRI. ANIKESH BANERJEE (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri V M Veeramani, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Leena Lal, (SR.AR.)
Section 11Section 12ASection 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 270A

Charitable Trust v. Income-tax Officer reported in [2025] 171 taxmann.com 466 (Chennai - Trib.)held where assessee-trust, initially mentioned Rs. 71.77 lakhs instead of Nil under section 11(1)(2) and later filed a revised audit report and claimed repayment of loan as application of income, since assessee’s claim was supported by audited financials, revised audit report, revised

KAOSER CHARITABLE TRUST,KANNUR vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD, KANNUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee stand allowed for

ITA 487/COCH/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Aug 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: S/Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Prakash Chand Yadav

For Appellant: Shri Arun Raj, Sr AdvFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. DR
Section 250(6)Section 272A(2)(e)Section 68

Charitable Trust, Kaoser Income Tax Officer, Exemption Vs. Complex Caltex South Bazar, Kannur- Ward, Kannur 670002 PAN No.AACFK 6890 J APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri Arun Raj, Sr Adv. Revenue by : Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. DR Date of hearing : 06.08.2025 Date of Pronouncement : 20.08.2025 O R D E R PER PRAKASH CHAND YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER: Both the appeals

KAOSER CHARITABLE TRUST,KANNUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD, KANNUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee stand allowed for

ITA 486/COCH/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Aug 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: S/Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Prakash Chand Yadav

For Appellant: Shri Arun Raj, Sr AdvFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. DR
Section 250(6)Section 272A(2)(e)Section 68

Charitable Trust, Kaoser Income Tax Officer, Exemption Vs. Complex Caltex South Bazar, Kannur- Ward, Kannur 670002 PAN No.AACFK 6890 J APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri Arun Raj, Sr Adv. Revenue by : Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. DR Date of hearing : 06.08.2025 Date of Pronouncement : 20.08.2025 O R D E R PER PRAKASH CHAND YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER: Both the appeals

KURIAKOSE ELIAS CARMEL EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST,ALAPPUZHA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (E), ALAPPUZHA, ALAPPUZHA

Appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 256/COCH/2025[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Jun 2025AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

For Appellant: Shri. P.V. Chacko, CAFor Respondent: Smt.. Leena Lal, Sr, DR
Section 10Section 12ASection 148Section 69A

charitable trust engaged in educational activities and running a school in a village of Kuttanadu in Kerala. It was granted registration under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’] vide order dated 26.09.2018 effective from AY 2018–19 onwards .As the assessee’s gross receipts were below Rs. 1 crore, it claimed exemption

SRI.VARUGEHESE M. UTHUP,KOCHI vs. THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE,, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 171/COCH/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Jul 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 144Section 153ASection 249(2)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

penalty orders passed. In the meantime, Smt. Susan Thomas's husband, Sri. Varughese M. Uthup had to appear in a court relating to his matter on 14.03.2018. On knowing about the demands, the assessee contacted one of the employees of the assessee-company who informed that the assessment orders were handed over to the erstwhile Chartered Accountant, Shri James Thomas

SRI.VARUGEHESE M. UTHUP,KOCHI vs. THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE,, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 165/COCH/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Jul 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 144Section 153ASection 249(2)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

penalty orders passed. In the meantime, Smt. Susan Thomas's husband, Sri. Varughese M. Uthup had to appear in a court relating to his matter on 14.03.2018. On knowing about the demands, the assessee contacted one of the employees of the assessee-company who informed that the assessment orders were handed over to the erstwhile Chartered Accountant, Shri James Thomas

SRI VARGHESE M.UTHUP,KOCHI vs. THE ACIT,CEN-CIRCLE-2, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 161/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Jul 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 144Section 153ASection 249(2)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

penalty orders passed. In the meantime, Smt. Susan Thomas's husband, Sri. Varughese M. Uthup had to appear in a court relating to his matter on 14.03.2018. On knowing about the demands, the assessee contacted one of the employees of the assessee-company who informed that the assessment orders were handed over to the erstwhile Chartered Accountant, Shri James Thomas

SRI.VARUGEHESE M. UTHUP,KOCHI vs. THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE,, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 164/COCH/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Jul 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 144Section 153ASection 249(2)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

penalty orders passed. In the meantime, Smt. Susan Thomas's husband, Sri. Varughese M. Uthup had to appear in a court relating to his matter on 14.03.2018. On knowing about the demands, the assessee contacted one of the employees of the assessee-company who informed that the assessment orders were handed over to the erstwhile Chartered Accountant, Shri James Thomas

SRI.VARUGEHESE M. UTHUP,KOCHI vs. THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE,, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 166/COCH/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Jul 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 144Section 153ASection 249(2)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

penalty orders passed. In the meantime, Smt. Susan Thomas's husband, Sri. Varughese M. Uthup had to appear in a court relating to his matter on 14.03.2018. On knowing about the demands, the assessee contacted one of the employees of the assessee-company who informed that the assessment orders were handed over to the erstwhile Chartered Accountant, Shri James Thomas

SRI.VARUGEHESE M. UTHUP,KOCHI vs. THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE,, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 167/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Jul 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 144Section 153ASection 249(2)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

penalty orders passed. In the meantime, Smt. Susan Thomas's husband, Sri. Varughese M. Uthup had to appear in a court relating to his matter on 14.03.2018. On knowing about the demands, the assessee contacted one of the employees of the assessee-company who informed that the assessment orders were handed over to the erstwhile Chartered Accountant, Shri James Thomas

SRI.VARUGEHESE M. UTHUP,KOCHI vs. THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE,, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 170/COCH/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Jul 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 144Section 153ASection 249(2)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

penalty orders passed. In the meantime, Smt. Susan Thomas's husband, Sri. Varughese M. Uthup had to appear in a court relating to his matter on 14.03.2018. On knowing about the demands, the assessee contacted one of the employees of the assessee-company who informed that the assessment orders were handed over to the erstwhile Chartered Accountant, Shri James Thomas

SRI.VARUGEHESE M. UTHUP,KOCHI vs. THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE,, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 172/COCH/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Jul 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 144Section 153ASection 249(2)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

penalty orders passed. In the meantime, Smt. Susan Thomas's husband, Sri. Varughese M. Uthup had to appear in a court relating to his matter on 14.03.2018. On knowing about the demands, the assessee contacted one of the employees of the assessee-company who informed that the assessment orders were handed over to the erstwhile Chartered Accountant, Shri James Thomas

SRI VARGHESE M.UTHUP,KOCHI vs. THE ACIT,CEN-CIRCLE-2, KOCHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 162/COCH/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin08 Jul 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 144Section 153ASection 249(2)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

penalty orders passed. In the meantime, Smt. Susan Thomas's husband, Sri. Varughese M. Uthup had to appear in a court relating to his matter on 14.03.2018. On knowing about the demands, the assessee contacted one of the employees of the assessee-company who informed that the assessment orders were handed over to the erstwhile Chartered Accountant, Shri James Thomas