BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

36 results for “charitable trust”+ Cash Depositclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi251Mumbai174Chennai128Bangalore93Jaipur87Karnataka87Hyderabad76Ahmedabad49Chandigarh45Kolkata45Cochin36Pune35Lucknow24Visakhapatnam22Allahabad12Indore12Amritsar9Agra8Cuttack8Nagpur8Raipur8Rajkot8Patna6Surat4Jodhpur4Telangana3SC2Varanasi2Guwahati1Calcutta1Rajasthan1Andhra Pradesh1Kerala1Dehradun1

Key Topics

Section 12A31Section 1131Addition to Income31Section 139(1)23Section 14814Charitable Trust12Exemption12Cash Deposit11Section 142(1)6Section 147

SREE NARAYANA PUBLIC,KARUNAGAPALLY vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, ALAPPUZHA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 238/COCH/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am Assessment Year: 2017-18 Sree Narayana Public School .......... Appellant Pavumba, P.O., Karunagapplly 690574 [Pan: Aants1510Q] Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward - 4, Alappuzha .......... Respondent

For Appellant: Shri R. Krishnan, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 10Section 10(23)(iiiad)Section 115BSection 139(1)Section 142(1)Section 2

charitable trust incorporated under the provisions of Trust Act. It was found with the object of running a school. No regular return of income for AY 2017-18 under the provisions of section 139(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) was filed, However, the Income Tax Officer, Ward-4, Alappuzha (hereinafter called "the AO"), based

Showing 1–20 of 36 · Page 1 of 2

5
Section 1395
Section 143(3)5

S N D P YOGAM KOZHENCHERRY UNION,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. ITO, WARD 2, THIRUVALLA

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stand dismissed

ITA 243/COCH/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am

For Appellant: ------- None -------For Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 11Section 12ASection 139(1)Section 147Section 148Section 2Section 2(24)

charitable trust. The appellant trust does not enjoy registration u/s. 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). No regular return of income u/s. 139(1) of the Act was filed by the appellant. Subsequently, based on the information that the appellant trust made cash deposit

S N D P YOGAM KOZHENCHERRY UNION,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. ITO, WARD 2, THIRUVALLA

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stand dismissed

ITA 244/COCH/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am

For Appellant: ------- None -------For Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 11Section 12ASection 139(1)Section 147Section 148Section 2Section 2(24)

charitable trust. The appellant trust does not enjoy registration u/s. 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). No regular return of income u/s. 139(1) of the Act was filed by the appellant. Subsequently, based on the information that the appellant trust made cash deposit

THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM vs. SRI.JOSE THOMAS, ADOOR

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 238/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

deposit was due on maturity only, i.e. 25.2.2012. It was explained that the correct rental income was computed by the assessee and included in the return filed u/s 153A of the IT Act, 1961. As an explanation for the source of funds for the credits in bank accounts the assesseestated that he owned 5 acres of Rubber Estate, the trees

THE ACIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM vs. SMT.GRACY BABU, ADOOR P.O.

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 239/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

deposit was due on maturity only, i.e. 25.2.2012. It was explained that the correct rental income was computed by the assessee and included in the return filed u/s 153A of the IT Act, 1961. As an explanation for the source of funds for the credits in bank accounts the assesseestated that he owned 5 acres of Rubber Estate, the trees

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 29/COCH/2019[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

deposit was due on maturity only, i.e. 25.2.2012. It was explained that the correct rental income was computed by the assessee and included in the return filed u/s 153A of the IT Act, 1961. As an explanation for the source of funds for the credits in bank accounts the assesseestated that he owned 5 acres of Rubber Estate, the trees

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 304/COCH/2019[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

deposit was due on maturity only, i.e. 25.2.2012. It was explained that the correct rental income was computed by the assessee and included in the return filed u/s 153A of the IT Act, 1961. As an explanation for the source of funds for the credits in bank accounts the assesseestated that he owned 5 acres of Rubber Estate, the trees

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT,CEN- CIRCLE,, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 306/COCH/2019[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

deposit was due on maturity only, i.e. 25.2.2012. It was explained that the correct rental income was computed by the assessee and included in the return filed u/s 153A of the IT Act, 1961. As an explanation for the source of funds for the credits in bank accounts the assesseestated that he owned 5 acres of Rubber Estate, the trees

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT,CEN- CIRCLE,, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 309/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

deposit was due on maturity only, i.e. 25.2.2012. It was explained that the correct rental income was computed by the assessee and included in the return filed u/s 153A of the IT Act, 1961. As an explanation for the source of funds for the credits in bank accounts the assesseestated that he owned 5 acres of Rubber Estate, the trees

SMT.GRACY BABU,ADOOR P.O. vs. THE DCIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 33/COCH/2019[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

deposit was due on maturity only, i.e. 25.2.2012. It was explained that the correct rental income was computed by the assessee and included in the return filed u/s 153A of the IT Act, 1961. As an explanation for the source of funds for the credits in bank accounts the assesseestated that he owned 5 acres of Rubber Estate, the trees

SMT.GRACY BABU,ADOOR P.O. vs. THE DCIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 34/COCH/2019[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

deposit was due on maturity only, i.e. 25.2.2012. It was explained that the correct rental income was computed by the assessee and included in the return filed u/s 153A of the IT Act, 1961. As an explanation for the source of funds for the credits in bank accounts the assesseestated that he owned 5 acres of Rubber Estate, the trees

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 27/COCH/2019[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

deposit was due on maturity only, i.e. 25.2.2012. It was explained that the correct rental income was computed by the assessee and included in the return filed u/s 153A of the IT Act, 1961. As an explanation for the source of funds for the credits in bank accounts the assesseestated that he owned 5 acres of Rubber Estate, the trees

MRS.GRACY BABU,ADOOR P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 210/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

deposit was due on maturity only, i.e. 25.2.2012. It was explained that the correct rental income was computed by the assessee and included in the return filed u/s 153A of the IT Act, 1961. As an explanation for the source of funds for the credits in bank accounts the assesseestated that he owned 5 acres of Rubber Estate, the trees

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE ACIT,CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 213/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

deposit was due on maturity only, i.e. 25.2.2012. It was explained that the correct rental income was computed by the assessee and included in the return filed u/s 153A of the IT Act, 1961. As an explanation for the source of funds for the credits in bank accounts the assesseestated that he owned 5 acres of Rubber Estate, the trees

SMT.GRACY BABU,ADOOR P.O. vs. THE DCIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 32/COCH/2019[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

deposit was due on maturity only, i.e. 25.2.2012. It was explained that the correct rental income was computed by the assessee and included in the return filed u/s 153A of the IT Act, 1961. As an explanation for the source of funds for the credits in bank accounts the assesseestated that he owned 5 acres of Rubber Estate, the trees

SMT.GRACY BABU,ADOOR P.O. vs. THE DCIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 35/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

deposit was due on maturity only, i.e. 25.2.2012. It was explained that the correct rental income was computed by the assessee and included in the return filed u/s 153A of the IT Act, 1961. As an explanation for the source of funds for the credits in bank accounts the assesseestated that he owned 5 acres of Rubber Estate, the trees

THE DCIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM vs. SMT.GRACY BABU, ADOOR P.O.

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 54/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

deposit was due on maturity only, i.e. 25.2.2012. It was explained that the correct rental income was computed by the assessee and included in the return filed u/s 153A of the IT Act, 1961. As an explanation for the source of funds for the credits in bank accounts the assesseestated that he owned 5 acres of Rubber Estate, the trees

THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM vs. SRI.JOSE THOMAS, ADOOR

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 55/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

deposit was due on maturity only, i.e. 25.2.2012. It was explained that the correct rental income was computed by the assessee and included in the return filed u/s 153A of the IT Act, 1961. As an explanation for the source of funds for the credits in bank accounts the assesseestated that he owned 5 acres of Rubber Estate, the trees

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 28/COCH/2019[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

deposit was due on maturity only, i.e. 25.2.2012. It was explained that the correct rental income was computed by the assessee and included in the return filed u/s 153A of the IT Act, 1961. As an explanation for the source of funds for the credits in bank accounts the assesseestated that he owned 5 acres of Rubber Estate, the trees

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 30/COCH/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

deposit was due on maturity only, i.e. 25.2.2012. It was explained that the correct rental income was computed by the assessee and included in the return filed u/s 153A of the IT Act, 1961. As an explanation for the source of funds for the credits in bank accounts the assesseestated that he owned 5 acres of Rubber Estate, the trees