BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

157 results for “capital gains”+ Section 79clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,794Delhi1,397Bangalore609Ahmedabad435Chennai398Kolkata369Jaipur321Hyderabad211Surat190Chandigarh188Karnataka169Cochin157Indore145Pune133Raipur92Visakhapatnam59Calcutta57Cuttack57Nagpur56Guwahati47Rajkot37Lucknow30Amritsar29Telangana17Ranchi15SC14Dehradun12Agra8Jabalpur8Jodhpur7Panaji7Patna5Rajasthan4Varanasi3Allahabad2Kerala2Andhra Pradesh1Punjab & Haryana1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Orissa1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 25092Addition to Income40Section 143(3)36Section 4018Section 26316Section 13215Disallowance14Section 14A12Reassessment11Search & Seizure

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT,CEN- CIRCLE,, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 305/COCH/2019[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

79. It is also supported by sworn statement of Shri Jose Thomas on 19/03/2009 and also of Smt. GracyBabu on 04/03/2009 placed at paper books at pages 1-11 and 30-32. Being so, we do not find any force in the argument of the Ld. AR in pleading that collection of unaccounted fees should be allocated among the trustees

THE DCIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM vs. SMT.GRACY BABU, ADOOR P.O.

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 54/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

79. It is also supported by sworn statement of Shri Jose Thomas on 19/03/2009 and also of Smt. GracyBabu on 04/03/2009 placed at paper books at pages 1-11 and 30-32. Being so, we do not find any force in the argument of the Ld. AR in pleading that collection of unaccounted fees should be allocated among the trustees

Showing 1–20 of 157 · Page 1 of 8

...
11
Section 14810
Cash Deposit10

SMT.GRACY BABU,ADOOR P.O. vs. THE DCIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 33/COCH/2019[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

79. It is also supported by sworn statement of Shri Jose Thomas on 19/03/2009 and also of Smt. GracyBabu on 04/03/2009 placed at paper books at pages 1-11 and 30-32. Being so, we do not find any force in the argument of the Ld. AR in pleading that collection of unaccounted fees should be allocated among the trustees

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT,CEN- CIRCLE,, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 310/COCH/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

79. It is also supported by sworn statement of Shri Jose Thomas on 19/03/2009 and also of Smt. GracyBabu on 04/03/2009 placed at paper books at pages 1-11 and 30-32. Being so, we do not find any force in the argument of the Ld. AR in pleading that collection of unaccounted fees should be allocated among the trustees

SMT.GRACY BABU,ADOOR P.O. vs. THE DCIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 35/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

79. It is also supported by sworn statement of Shri Jose Thomas on 19/03/2009 and also of Smt. GracyBabu on 04/03/2009 placed at paper books at pages 1-11 and 30-32. Being so, we do not find any force in the argument of the Ld. AR in pleading that collection of unaccounted fees should be allocated among the trustees

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 31/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

79. It is also supported by sworn statement of Shri Jose Thomas on 19/03/2009 and also of Smt. GracyBabu on 04/03/2009 placed at paper books at pages 1-11 and 30-32. Being so, we do not find any force in the argument of the Ld. AR in pleading that collection of unaccounted fees should be allocated among the trustees

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT,CEN- CIRCLE,, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 309/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

79. It is also supported by sworn statement of Shri Jose Thomas on 19/03/2009 and also of Smt. GracyBabu on 04/03/2009 placed at paper books at pages 1-11 and 30-32. Being so, we do not find any force in the argument of the Ld. AR in pleading that collection of unaccounted fees should be allocated among the trustees

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 304/COCH/2019[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

79. It is also supported by sworn statement of Shri Jose Thomas on 19/03/2009 and also of Smt. GracyBabu on 04/03/2009 placed at paper books at pages 1-11 and 30-32. Being so, we do not find any force in the argument of the Ld. AR in pleading that collection of unaccounted fees should be allocated among the trustees

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT,CEN- CIRCLE,, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 306/COCH/2019[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

79. It is also supported by sworn statement of Shri Jose Thomas on 19/03/2009 and also of Smt. GracyBabu on 04/03/2009 placed at paper books at pages 1-11 and 30-32. Being so, we do not find any force in the argument of the Ld. AR in pleading that collection of unaccounted fees should be allocated among the trustees

THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM vs. SRI.JOSE THOMAS, ADOOR

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 238/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

79. It is also supported by sworn statement of Shri Jose Thomas on 19/03/2009 and also of Smt. GracyBabu on 04/03/2009 placed at paper books at pages 1-11 and 30-32. Being so, we do not find any force in the argument of the Ld. AR in pleading that collection of unaccounted fees should be allocated among the trustees

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 28/COCH/2019[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

79. It is also supported by sworn statement of Shri Jose Thomas on 19/03/2009 and also of Smt. GracyBabu on 04/03/2009 placed at paper books at pages 1-11 and 30-32. Being so, we do not find any force in the argument of the Ld. AR in pleading that collection of unaccounted fees should be allocated among the trustees

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT,CEN- CIRCLE,, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 308/COCH/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

79. It is also supported by sworn statement of Shri Jose Thomas on 19/03/2009 and also of Smt. GracyBabu on 04/03/2009 placed at paper books at pages 1-11 and 30-32. Being so, we do not find any force in the argument of the Ld. AR in pleading that collection of unaccounted fees should be allocated among the trustees

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 30/COCH/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

79. It is also supported by sworn statement of Shri Jose Thomas on 19/03/2009 and also of Smt. GracyBabu on 04/03/2009 placed at paper books at pages 1-11 and 30-32. Being so, we do not find any force in the argument of the Ld. AR in pleading that collection of unaccounted fees should be allocated among the trustees

THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM vs. SRI.JOSE THOMAS, ADOOR

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 55/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

79. It is also supported by sworn statement of Shri Jose Thomas on 19/03/2009 and also of Smt. GracyBabu on 04/03/2009 placed at paper books at pages 1-11 and 30-32. Being so, we do not find any force in the argument of the Ld. AR in pleading that collection of unaccounted fees should be allocated among the trustees

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE ACIT,CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 213/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

79. It is also supported by sworn statement of Shri Jose Thomas on 19/03/2009 and also of Smt. GracyBabu on 04/03/2009 placed at paper books at pages 1-11 and 30-32. Being so, we do not find any force in the argument of the Ld. AR in pleading that collection of unaccounted fees should be allocated among the trustees

MRS.GRACY BABU,ADOOR P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 210/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

79. It is also supported by sworn statement of Shri Jose Thomas on 19/03/2009 and also of Smt. GracyBabu on 04/03/2009 placed at paper books at pages 1-11 and 30-32. Being so, we do not find any force in the argument of the Ld. AR in pleading that collection of unaccounted fees should be allocated among the trustees

THE ACIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM vs. SMT.GRACY BABU, ADOOR P.O.

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 239/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

79. It is also supported by sworn statement of Shri Jose Thomas on 19/03/2009 and also of Smt. GracyBabu on 04/03/2009 placed at paper books at pages 1-11 and 30-32. Being so, we do not find any force in the argument of the Ld. AR in pleading that collection of unaccounted fees should be allocated among the trustees

SMT.GRACY BABU,ADOOR P.O. vs. THE DCIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 34/COCH/2019[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

79. It is also supported by sworn statement of Shri Jose Thomas on 19/03/2009 and also of Smt. GracyBabu on 04/03/2009 placed at paper books at pages 1-11 and 30-32. Being so, we do not find any force in the argument of the Ld. AR in pleading that collection of unaccounted fees should be allocated among the trustees

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 29/COCH/2019[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

79. It is also supported by sworn statement of Shri Jose Thomas on 19/03/2009 and also of Smt. GracyBabu on 04/03/2009 placed at paper books at pages 1-11 and 30-32. Being so, we do not find any force in the argument of the Ld. AR in pleading that collection of unaccounted fees should be allocated among the trustees

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 27/COCH/2019[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

79. It is also supported by sworn statement of Shri Jose Thomas on 19/03/2009 and also of Smt. GracyBabu on 04/03/2009 placed at paper books at pages 1-11 and 30-32. Being so, we do not find any force in the argument of the Ld. AR in pleading that collection of unaccounted fees should be allocated among the trustees