BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “capital gains”+ Section 56(2)(viia)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai111Chandigarh51Delhi22Bangalore15Hyderabad14Cuttack7Chennai7Cochin4Jaipur4Nagpur4Kolkata3Ahmedabad2Lucknow1Patna1Pune1Rajkot1

Key Topics

Section 4016Section 143(3)8Section 40A(3)4Disallowance4Addition to Income4

THE KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES LIMITED,THRISSUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE 1(1) TPS, THRISSUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee as well as Revenue stand partly allowed

ITA 869/COCH/2023[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 May 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Accontant Member & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Respondent: Sri.Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 40Section 40A(3)

2. Since identical issues are involved in these appeals, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this consolidated order, for the sake of convenience. First, we take the appeal filed by the assessee and Revenue for assessment year 2020-2021, for adjudication. ITA No.81/Coch/2024 : (Assessee’s Appeal) ITA No.50/Coch/2024 : (Revenue’s Appeal) 3. Briefly, the facts

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, THRISSUR vs. THE KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES LIMITED, THRISSUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee as well as Revenue stand partly allowed

ITA 50/COCH/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 May 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Accontant Member & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Respondent: Sri.Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 40Section 40A(3)

2. Since identical issues are involved in these appeals, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this consolidated order, for the sake of convenience. First, we take the appeal filed by the assessee and Revenue for assessment year 2020-2021, for adjudication. ITA No.81/Coch/2024 : (Assessee’s Appeal) ITA No.50/Coch/2024 : (Revenue’s Appeal) 3. Briefly, the facts

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE-1(1), THRISSUR vs. THE KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES LIMITED, THRISSUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee as well as Revenue stand partly allowed

ITA 51/COCH/2024[2021]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 May 2025

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Accontant Member & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Respondent: Sri.Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 40Section 40A(3)

2. Since identical issues are involved in these appeals, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this consolidated order, for the sake of convenience. First, we take the appeal filed by the assessee and Revenue for assessment year 2020-2021, for adjudication. ITA No.81/Coch/2024 : (Assessee’s Appeal) ITA No.50/Coch/2024 : (Revenue’s Appeal) 3. Briefly, the facts

THE KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISE LTD,CHEMBUKKAVU vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1) &TPS, THRISSUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee as well as Revenue stand partly allowed

ITA 81/COCH/2024[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin14 May 2025AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Accontant Member & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Respondent: Sri.Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 40Section 40A(3)

2. Since identical issues are involved in these appeals, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this consolidated order, for the sake of convenience. First, we take the appeal filed by the assessee and Revenue for assessment year 2020-2021, for adjudication. ITA No.81/Coch/2024 : (Assessee’s Appeal) ITA No.50/Coch/2024 : (Revenue’s Appeal) 3. Briefly, the facts