BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “capital gains”+ Section 43Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai85Chennai30Bangalore23Delhi22Hyderabad19Kolkata12Ahmedabad11SC9Pune7Surat6Cochin3Rajkot1Telangana1Jaipur1Visakhapatnam1Kerala1Chandigarh1Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 1547Section 406Section 40A(3)5Deduction3Section 292Section 302Section 52Section 143(3)2

JULIUS RUBEN,KOCHI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 219/COCH/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin16 May 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri George George K, Vice- & Shri Inturi Rama Rao

For Appellant: Sri.A.Gopalakrishnan, CAFor Respondent: Smt.Leena Lal, Senior AR
Section 139(4)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 250Section 40A(3)

gains from business or profession computed in accordance with the provisions of sections 28 to 43D of the Act and in the instances stated by the Assessing Officer for an aggregate amount of Rs. 6,55,650 the appellant did not claim any deduction and therefore provisions of section 40A(3) are not applicable. 7. The Hon. Commissioner of Income

M/S. K.K ABRAHAM AND COMPANY,KOCHI vs. THE ITO, NON CORPORATE WARD 1(3), KOCHI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 853/COCH/2022[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Mar 2023AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri George George K. & Ms. Padmavathy S.

For Appellant: Shri Narayanan P. Potty, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 29Section 30Section 40Section 5

capitalizing the surplus in the business other than depositing the same in FDR of reputed Banks. In this case the source of the interest income and destination of the interest income were the same Firm, it is quite natural that it is to be treated as Business gain. 3. The CIT (Appeals) ought to allow the Appellant firm to include

M/S. K.K ABRAHAM AND COMPANY,KOCHI vs. THE ITO, NON CORPORATE WARD 1(3), KOCHI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 854/COCH/2022[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Mar 2023AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri George George K. & Ms. Padmavathy S.

For Appellant: Shri Narayanan P. Potty, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 29Section 30Section 40Section 5

capitalizing the surplus in the business other than depositing the same in FDR of reputed Banks. In this case the source of the interest income and destination of the interest income were the same Firm, it is quite natural that it is to be treated as Business gain. 3. The CIT (Appeals) ought to allow the Appellant firm to include