BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

399 results for “capital gains”+ Section 4(1)(a)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai8,358Delhi6,168Chennai2,561Bangalore2,558Kolkata1,949Ahmedabad1,847Jaipur1,241Hyderabad1,155Pune1,130Surat731Chandigarh638Indore598Karnataka508Visakhapatnam400Cochin399Raipur294Nagpur267Rajkot259Cuttack185Amritsar180Lucknow175Agra172Panaji123Guwahati111Calcutta107Telangana104SC102Patna94Ranchi91Dehradun91Jodhpur78Jabalpur70Allahabad36Varanasi25Kerala21Rajasthan11Orissa9Punjab & Haryana9A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Gauhati2Andhra Pradesh2Himachal Pradesh2ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1

Key Topics

Section 80P40Addition to Income37Section 153A36Section 143(3)34Section 14A27Section 25025Deduction23Section 26320Section 10B20Section 143(2)

THE ACIT, COCHIN vs. M/S.PVR TOURIST HOME, COCHIN

ITA 428/COCH/2015[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin21 Mar 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Soundararajan K., Jm Assessment Year: 2012-13 Acit, Circle-1, Non-Corporate .......... Appellant Iind Floor, C.R. Building, I.S. Press Road Ernakulam 682018 Vs. Pvr Tourist Home .......... Respondent Palarivattom, Kochi 682025 [Pan: Aadfp3442Q] Appellant By: Shri Suresh Sivanandan, Cit-Dr Respondent By: Shri Mohan Pulickal, Advocate Date Of Hearing: 10.03.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 21.03.2025

For Appellant: Shri Suresh Sivanandan, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri Mohan Pulickal, Advocate
Section 143(3)Section 45(4)Section 48Section 50Section 50(1)Section 50A

1) of the Act not attracting any capital gains tax because the transfer was at the book value. The Commissioner acting under section 263 held that the entire transaction attracted tax on capital gains u/s. 45(4

Showing 1–20 of 399 · Page 1 of 20

...
18
Disallowance16
Capital Gains14

M/S POPULAR FINANCE COMPANY,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE ACIT,CIR-1,, THIRUVALLA

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 202/COCH/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Dec 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 37(1)

4,6.10. Similar issue has come up for consideration in the case of Smt. Santosh Agarwal, [2003] 1 SOT 431, before Hon'ble ITAT Cuttack and the Tribunal held as under: "2. The assessee earned considerable income by way of capital gains, dividend and interest during the year under consideration. The first ground in this appeal relates to the addition

M/S.POPULAR FINANCE,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-1, THIRUVALLA

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 203/COCH/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Dec 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 37(1)

4,6.10. Similar issue has come up for consideration in the case of Smt. Santosh Agarwal, [2003] 1 SOT 431, before Hon'ble ITAT Cuttack and the Tribunal held as under: "2. The assessee earned considerable income by way of capital gains, dividend and interest during the year under consideration. The first ground in this appeal relates to the addition

M/S POPULAR FINANCE COMPANY,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE ACIT,CIR-1,, THIRUVALLA

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 204/COCH/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Dec 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 37(1)

4,6.10. Similar issue has come up for consideration in the case of Smt. Santosh Agarwal, [2003] 1 SOT 431, before Hon'ble ITAT Cuttack and the Tribunal held as under: "2. The assessee earned considerable income by way of capital gains, dividend and interest during the year under consideration. The first ground in this appeal relates to the addition

DCIT, THIRUVALLA vs. MAR GREGORIOUS MEMORIAL MUTHOOT MEDICAL CENTRE, KOZHENCHERRY

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical

ITA 71/COCH/2018[2004-05]Status: HeardITAT Cochin21 Feb 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 37(1)Section 45Section 57

4,6.10. Similar issue has come up for consideration in the case of Smt. Santosh Agarwal, [2003] 1 SOT 431, before Hon'ble ITAT Cuttack and the Tribunal held as under: "2. The assessee earned considerable income by way of capital gains, dividend and interest during the year under consideration. The first ground in this appeal relates to the addition

DCIT, THIRUVALLA vs. MAR GREGORIOUS MEMORIAL MUTHOOT MEDICAL CENTRE, KOZHENCHERRY

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical

ITA 70/COCH/2018[2003-04]Status: HeardITAT Cochin21 Feb 2019AY 2003-04

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 37(1)Section 45Section 57

4,6.10. Similar issue has come up for consideration in the case of Smt. Santosh Agarwal, [2003] 1 SOT 431, before Hon'ble ITAT Cuttack and the Tribunal held as under: "2. The assessee earned considerable income by way of capital gains, dividend and interest during the year under consideration. The first ground in this appeal relates to the addition

THE ACIT, THIRUVALLA vs. M/S.MUTHOOT PROPERTIES & INVESTMENTS, KOZHENCHERRY

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical

ITA 73/COCH/2018[2002-03]Status: HeardITAT Cochin21 Feb 2019AY 2002-03

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 37(1)Section 45Section 57

4,6.10. Similar issue has come up for consideration in the case of Smt. Santosh Agarwal, [2003] 1 SOT 431, before Hon'ble ITAT Cuttack and the Tribunal held as under: "2. The assessee earned considerable income by way of capital gains, dividend and interest during the year under consideration. The first ground in this appeal relates to the addition

DCIT, THIRUVALLA vs. MUTHOOT PROPERTIES & INVESTMENTS,, KOZHENCHERRY

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical

ITA 74/COCH/2018[2003-04]Status: HeardITAT Cochin21 Feb 2019AY 2003-04

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 37(1)Section 45Section 57

4,6.10. Similar issue has come up for consideration in the case of Smt. Santosh Agarwal, [2003] 1 SOT 431, before Hon'ble ITAT Cuttack and the Tribunal held as under: "2. The assessee earned considerable income by way of capital gains, dividend and interest during the year under consideration. The first ground in this appeal relates to the addition

THE ACIT, THIRUVALLA vs. M/S.MUTHOOT PROPERTIES & INVESTMENTS, KOZHENCHERRY

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical

ITA 75/COCH/2018[2005-06]Status: HeardITAT Cochin21 Feb 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 37(1)Section 45Section 57

4,6.10. Similar issue has come up for consideration in the case of Smt. Santosh Agarwal, [2003] 1 SOT 431, before Hon'ble ITAT Cuttack and the Tribunal held as under: "2. The assessee earned considerable income by way of capital gains, dividend and interest during the year under consideration. The first ground in this appeal relates to the addition

DCIT, THIRUVALLA vs. MAR GREGORIOUS MEMORIAL MUTHOOT MEDICAL CENTRE, KOZHENCHERRY

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical

ITA 72/COCH/2018[2007-08]Status: HeardITAT Cochin21 Feb 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 37(1)Section 45Section 57

4,6.10. Similar issue has come up for consideration in the case of Smt. Santosh Agarwal, [2003] 1 SOT 431, before Hon'ble ITAT Cuttack and the Tribunal held as under: "2. The assessee earned considerable income by way of capital gains, dividend and interest during the year under consideration. The first ground in this appeal relates to the addition

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-1, THIRUVALLA, THIRUVALLA vs. MAR GREGORIOUS MEMORIAL MUTHOOT MEDICAL CENTRE, PATHANAMTHITTA

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical

ITA 69/COCH/2018[2002-03]Status: HeardITAT Cochin21 Feb 2019AY 2002-03

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 37(1)Section 45Section 57

4,6.10. Similar issue has come up for consideration in the case of Smt. Santosh Agarwal, [2003] 1 SOT 431, before Hon'ble ITAT Cuttack and the Tribunal held as under: "2. The assessee earned considerable income by way of capital gains, dividend and interest during the year under consideration. The first ground in this appeal relates to the addition

ACEELERATED FREEZE DRYING CO.LTD,ALAPPUZHA vs. DCIT, ALAPPUZHA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is allowed and the appeal of the

ITA 1286/COCH/2005[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin28 Jun 2019AY 2002-03

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 2Section 2(14)Section 42Section 50BSection 50B(1)

4. Having held that the capital gains on the transfer of he said property should be assessed u/s. 50B, the CIT(A) ought to have see that according to proviso to section 50B(1

DCIT, ALAPPUZHA vs. M/S ACEELERATED FREEZE DRYING CO, LTD, ALAPPUZHA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is allowed and the appeal of the

ITA 714/COCH/2008[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin28 Jun 2019AY 2002-03

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 2Section 2(14)Section 42Section 50BSection 50B(1)

4. Having held that the capital gains on the transfer of he said property should be assessed u/s. 50B, the CIT(A) ought to have see that according to proviso to section 50B(1

ROSE GEORGE KOLLANUR,THRISSUR vs. ITO WARD 2(2), THRISSUR, THRISSUR

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is allowed

ITA 610/COCH/2022[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin19 Dec 2022AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Ms. Padmavathy Sassessment Year : 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri V Ramnath, CAFor Respondent: Smt. J M Jamuna Devi, Sr. AR
Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 54Section 54F

4. Re.Point No. 1 Section 54(F) deals with capital gains on transfer of certain capital assets not to be charged

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1), ERNAKULAM, ERNAKULAM vs. SRI.E.M.PAUL, EDAKATTUKUDIYIL, KOTHAMANGALAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the appeals

ITA 449/COCH/2007[1999-2000]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 Jan 2019AY 1999-2000

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 2(24)(vi)Section 48

4) to charge capital gains in such cases were introduced in section 45 by Finance Act 1987 w.e.f 01/04/1988. As per clause (3) of section 45 profits and gains arising from the transfer of capital asset to the firm on 14/08/1998 is chargeable to tax. It was submitted that it was specifically stated in the said section that

SRI.ESSA ISMAIL SAIT,ERNAKULAM vs. THE ACIT,CIR-2(1),, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the appeals

ITA 605/COCH/2005[1999-2000]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 Jan 2019AY 1999-2000

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 2(24)(vi)Section 48

4) to charge capital gains in such cases were introduced in section 45 by Finance Act 1987 w.e.f 01/04/1988. As per clause (3) of section 45 profits and gains arising from the transfer of capital asset to the firm on 14/08/1998 is chargeable to tax. It was submitted that it was specifically stated in the said section that

THEACIT, CIR-1(1),EKM, ERNAKULAM vs. SRI.E.M.JOHNY, KOTHAMANGALAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the appeals

ITA 453/COCH/2007[1999-2000]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 Jan 2019AY 1999-2000

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 2(24)(vi)Section 48

4) to charge capital gains in such cases were introduced in section 45 by Finance Act 1987 w.e.f 01/04/1988. As per clause (3) of section 45 profits and gains arising from the transfer of capital asset to the firm on 14/08/1998 is chargeable to tax. It was submitted that it was specifically stated in the said section that

THE ITO, WARD-2, THODUPUZHA, THODUPUZHA vs. SRI.MARTIN JOHNY, KOTHAMANGALAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the appeals

ITA 354/COCH/2006[1999-2000]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 Jan 2019AY 1999-2000

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 2(24)(vi)Section 48

4) to charge capital gains in such cases were introduced in section 45 by Finance Act 1987 w.e.f 01/04/1988. As per clause (3) of section 45 profits and gains arising from the transfer of capital asset to the firm on 14/08/1998 is chargeable to tax. It was submitted that it was specifically stated in the said section that

THE ITO, WD-2, THODUPUZHA, THODUPUZHA vs. SRI.E.J.SONY, KOTHAMANGALAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the appeals

ITA 355/COCH/2006[1999-2000]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 Jan 2019AY 1999-2000

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 2(24)(vi)Section 48

4) to charge capital gains in such cases were introduced in section 45 by Finance Act 1987 w.e.f 01/04/1988. As per clause (3) of section 45 profits and gains arising from the transfer of capital asset to the firm on 14/08/1998 is chargeable to tax. It was submitted that it was specifically stated in the said section that

THE ACIT, CIR-1(1), ERNAKULAM, ERNAKULAM vs. SRI.JOSE MATHEW, M/S.E.V.MTHAI & SONS, KOTHAMANGALAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the appeals

ITA 450/COCH/2007[1999-2000]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 Jan 2019AY 1999-2000

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 2(24)(vi)Section 48

4) to charge capital gains in such cases were introduced in section 45 by Finance Act 1987 w.e.f 01/04/1988. As per clause (3) of section 45 profits and gains arising from the transfer of capital asset to the firm on 14/08/1998 is chargeable to tax. It was submitted that it was specifically stated in the said section that