BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

86 results for “capital gains”+ Section 33clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,534Delhi1,009Chennai386Ahmedabad311Bangalore302Jaipur293Hyderabad241Chandigarh183Kolkata182Pune105Indore105Raipur103Cochin86SC71Nagpur69Surat56Visakhapatnam45Amritsar45Panaji35Lucknow34Rajkot31Guwahati25Cuttack22Dehradun19Jodhpur16Agra15Patna11Jabalpur8Varanasi6Ranchi6Allahabad3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1

Key Topics

Section 250117Section 143(3)27Section 14A18Section 14714Addition to Income14Section 3612Capital Gains10Disallowance10Section 1489Limitation/Time-bar

RAMLA HAMEED,ALAPPUZHA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, ALAPPUZHA

The appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes with the direction that the Assessing

ITA 393/COCH/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin12 Aug 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Sonjoy Sarma

Section 143Section 147Section 148Section 48

capital gain at Rs. 67,33,017, and assessed total income at Rs. 74,80,823. 3. Aggrieved, the assessee preferred an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A), which was dismissed by upholding the action of the Assessing Officer. 4. Dissatisfied with the above order assessee is in appeal before this tribunal Before this tribunal, the assessee contended that

ACIT, COCHIN vs. SRI.P.C.JOSE, COCHIN

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed and Revenue’s appeal stands dismissed

Showing 1–20 of 86 · Page 1 of 5

8
Section 53A6
Section 1446
ITA 84/COCH/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin18 Mar 2025AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Keshav Dubey, Jm Assessment Year: 2008-09 P.C. Jose .......... Appellant Brothers Agencies, Jews Street Ernakulam 682031 [Pan: Abbpj8250F] Vs. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax .......... Respondent Circle - 2(1), Kochi Assessment Year: 2008-09 Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax .......... Appellant Circle - 2(1), Kochi Vs. P.C. Jose .......... Respondent Brothers Agencies, Jews Street Ernakulam 682031 [Pan: Abbpj8250F] Assessee By: Shri R. Krishnan, Ca Revenue By: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das & Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing: 20.02.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 18.03.2025 P.C. Jose

For Appellant: Shri R. Krishnan, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das &
Section 143(3)Section 2(14)(iii)Section 40

capital gain only Rs. 33,25,059/- is to be allowed and the balance amount of Rs. 9,00,000/- to be confirmed, as the same was claimed in respect of properties held to be agricultural land. The CIT(A) also held that the AO was not justified in disallowing the loss arising from the business of card division

M/S.APOLLO TYRES LTD,COCHIN vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, COCHIN

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 609/COCH/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin01 Sept 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Rahul Chaudhary, Jm Assessment Year: 2013-14 Apollo Tyres Ltd. .......... Appellant 3Rd Floor, Areekal Mansion, Panampilly Nagar, Kochi 682036 [Pan: Aaaca6990Q] Vs. Dcit, Corporate Circle-1(1), Kochi ......... Respondent Assessee By: Shri Abraham Joseph Markos, Adv. Revenue By: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 20.08.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 01.09.2025

For Appellant: Shri Abraham Joseph Markos, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 32Section 32(1)(iia)Section 35Section 43(1)Section 92C

capital items can be only adjusted in terms of provisions section 43A of the Act. The loss or gain on such 30 Apollo Tyres Ltd. transaction had no impact on the determination of taxable income. Therefore, the AO had clearly fell in error in brining the same to tax in the year of reversal of the loss especially in view

RAJU JOSEPH VAYALAT,ERNAKULAM vs. ITO, WARD-2(5), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 273/COCH/2024[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin26 Aug 2025AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Sonjoy Sarma

Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 68

capital gain at Rs. 30,97,266.The assessment was completed under Section 143(3) on 28.12.2016, determining total income at Rs. 2,54,33

GOOD HOMES PVT LTD,KOCHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), KOCHI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 884/COCH/2022[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin11 Aug 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am &Shriabyt.Varkey, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.A.Gopalakrishnan, CAFor Respondent: Smt.J.M.Jamuna Devi, Sr.AR
Section 133ASection 147Section 148

section 147 r.w.s. 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter ‘the Act’) dated 18.3.2015 and 29.3.2014 for assessment year (AY) 2007-2008, respectively. The background facts of both the cases being same, these are heard together, and are being disposed of pera common, consolidated order for the sake of convenience. ITA Nos.870& 884 /Coch/2022 (AY 2007-08) Ajit

AJIT ASSOCIATES PRIVATE LIMITED,ERNAKULAM vs. JCIT, CORPORATE RANGE - 1, KOCHI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 870/COCH/2022[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin11 Aug 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am &Shriabyt.Varkey, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.A.Gopalakrishnan, CAFor Respondent: Smt.J.M.Jamuna Devi, Sr.AR
Section 133ASection 147Section 148

section 147 r.w.s. 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter ‘the Act’) dated 18.3.2015 and 29.3.2014 for assessment year (AY) 2007-2008, respectively. The background facts of both the cases being same, these are heard together, and are being disposed of pera common, consolidated order for the sake of convenience. ITA Nos.870& 884 /Coch/2022 (AY 2007-08) Ajit

IBRAHIM VELLACHALIL,KOZHIKODE vs. ITO, WARD-2(3), KOZHIKODE

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 851/COCH/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin25 Sept 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Amarjit Singhibrahim Vellachalil The Income Tax Officer- 2(3) Vellachall House Aayakar Bhavan P.O. Paranuur, Narikkuni Vs. Mananchira Kozhikode 673585 Kozhikode 673001 [Pan: Aclpi2507B] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: ------ None ------For Respondent: Smt. V. Swarnalatha, Sr. D.R
Section 250Section 54F

33,55,000/-. However, the appellant disclosed the sale consideration at Rs. 75,02,546/- in the return. i.e.@ of Rs.3.30 lacs per cent. The actual sale consideration later admitted by the appellant (subsequent to findings of the department) was at Rs.2,05,00,000/- which meant per cent value of Rs.9.19 lacs. The high centage value itself indicates that

ELIZABETH JOSE,ERNAKULAM vs. DCIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands dismissed

ITA 522/COCH/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin11 Aug 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am Assessment Year: 2016-17 Elizbeth Jose .......... Appellant Choice House, P.V. Sreedharan Road Kumbalam, Ernakulam 682506 [Pan: Acfpj2569J] Vs. Dcit, Corporate Circle - 1(1), Kochi .......... Respondent Assessee By: ------- None ------- Revenue By: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing: 06.08.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 11.08.2025 O R D E R This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [Cit(A)] Dated 12.06.2025 For Assessment Year (Ay) 2016-17. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Appellant Is An Individual. The Return Of Income For Ay 2016-17 Was Filed On 03.08 Disclosing Total Income Of Rs. 14,71,400/- & Unabsorbed Short Term Capital Loss Of Rs. 35,89,251/-. Against The Said Return Of Income, The Assessment Was Completed By The National Faceless Assessment Centre (Hereinafter Called "The Ao") Vide Order Dated 18.12.2018 Passed U/S. 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (The Act) Accepting

For Appellant: ------- None -------For Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 2(47)

33,776/- The balance short term capital gain of Rs. 48,05,504/- was brought to tax. The AO further held that since the property was purchased from her husband only through agreement of sale, which is not registered agreement, declined to accept the purchase consideration of Rs. 1,10,89,251/-. 3 Elizbeth Jose 4. Being aggrieved, an appeal

SHRI. HIRABAI HARIDAS DATTANI(LATE) BY L.H. SATHISH CHANDRA HARIDAS DATANI,KANNUR vs. THE ITO WARD-1, KANNUR, KANNUR

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 796/COCH/2022[2005-2006]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Oct 2023AY 2005-2006

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Daslate Hirabai Haridas Dattani The Income Tax Officer (By L/H Satish Chandra Haridas Datani) Ward – 1, 100, Arman Cantonment Vs. Kannur Kannur [Pan:Aalph1136R] (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri Arun Raj, Advocate Revenue By: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing: 12.10.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 30.10.2023 O R D E R Per Sanjay Arora, Am This Is An Appeal By The Assessee Directed Against The Order Dated 09.6.2022 By The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Nfac, Delhi [Cit(A)], Dismissing His Appeal Contesting His Assessment Under Section 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘The Act’) Dated 28.10.2010 For Assessment Year (Ay) 2005-06. 2. The Appeal Has Been Filed By The Assessee In His Capacity As The Legal Representative (Lr) Of His Late Mother, Smt. Hirabai Haridas Dattani. On Enquiry With Shri Raj, The Learned Counsel For The Assessee; The Valakat In His Favour Having Been Signed By The Assessee Alone, It Was Explained That The Assessee Has Been Pursuing The Matter From The Assessment Stage Onwards. His Only Brother, Shri Arun Dattani, Had Since Expired & He May Accordingly Be Taken As Representing The Estate Of His Late Mother For An On Behalf Of The Family, I.E., Including His Four Sisters; His Father Having Already Expired. The Hearing In The Matter Was Proceeded With On That Basis.

For Appellant: Shri Arun Raj, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 143(3)

section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’) dated 28.10.2010 for Assessment Year (AY) 2005-06. 2. The appeal has been filed by the assessee in his capacity as the legal representative (LR) of his late mother, Smt. Hirabai Haridas Dattani. On enquiry with Shri Raj, the learned counsel for the assessee; the Valakat in his favour

KAKKOTTAKATH NADUVILAPURAYIL JUNAID,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 497/COCH/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

33 Keeran Muhammed Basheer -do- 2017-18 508/COCH/2024 34 Keeran Muhammed Basheer ACIT, Central 2018-19 Circle -1, 509/COCH/2024 Calicut 35 Keeran Muhammed Basheer -do- 2019-20 510/COCH/2024 36 Keeran Muhammed Basheer -do- 2020-21 511/COCH/2024 ACIT, Central 37 Abdul Gafoor 2013-14 Circle, 512/COCH/2024 Kozhikode 38 Abdul Gafoor -do- 2015-16 513/COCH/2024 39 Abdul Gafoor -do- 2016-17 514/COCH/2024

RUCHIT PARIMAL ASHAR,SANALA ROAD, MORBI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CALICUT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 505/COCH/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

33 Keeran Muhammed Basheer -do- 2017-18 508/COCH/2024 34 Keeran Muhammed Basheer ACIT, Central 2018-19 Circle -1, 509/COCH/2024 Calicut 35 Keeran Muhammed Basheer -do- 2019-20 510/COCH/2024 36 Keeran Muhammed Basheer -do- 2020-21 511/COCH/2024 ACIT, Central 37 Abdul Gafoor 2013-14 Circle, 512/COCH/2024 Kozhikode 38 Abdul Gafoor -do- 2015-16 513/COCH/2024 39 Abdul Gafoor -do- 2016-17 514/COCH/2024

KAKKOTTAKATH NADUVILAPURAYIL JUNAID,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 498/COCH/2024[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

33 Keeran Muhammed Basheer -do- 2017-18 508/COCH/2024 34 Keeran Muhammed Basheer ACIT, Central 2018-19 Circle -1, 509/COCH/2024 Calicut 35 Keeran Muhammed Basheer -do- 2019-20 510/COCH/2024 36 Keeran Muhammed Basheer -do- 2020-21 511/COCH/2024 ACIT, Central 37 Abdul Gafoor 2013-14 Circle, 512/COCH/2024 Kozhikode 38 Abdul Gafoor -do- 2015-16 513/COCH/2024 39 Abdul Gafoor -do- 2016-17 514/COCH/2024

RUCHIT PARIMAL ASHAR,SANALA ROAD, MORBI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRLCE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 506/COCH/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

33 Keeran Muhammed Basheer -do- 2017-18 508/COCH/2024 34 Keeran Muhammed Basheer ACIT, Central 2018-19 Circle -1, 509/COCH/2024 Calicut 35 Keeran Muhammed Basheer -do- 2019-20 510/COCH/2024 36 Keeran Muhammed Basheer -do- 2020-21 511/COCH/2024 ACIT, Central 37 Abdul Gafoor 2013-14 Circle, 512/COCH/2024 Kozhikode 38 Abdul Gafoor -do- 2015-16 513/COCH/2024 39 Abdul Gafoor -do- 2016-17 514/COCH/2024

ABC SALES CORPORATION,KASARAGOD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 439/COCH/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

33 Keeran Muhammed Basheer -do- 2017-18 508/COCH/2024 34 Keeran Muhammed Basheer ACIT, Central 2018-19 Circle -1, 509/COCH/2024 Calicut 35 Keeran Muhammed Basheer -do- 2019-20 510/COCH/2024 36 Keeran Muhammed Basheer -do- 2020-21 511/COCH/2024 ACIT, Central 37 Abdul Gafoor 2013-14 Circle, 512/COCH/2024 Kozhikode 38 Abdul Gafoor -do- 2015-16 513/COCH/2024 39 Abdul Gafoor -do- 2016-17 514/COCH/2024

BATHX BATHWARE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,KOCHIN vs. ACIT, CENTRAL IRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 437/COCH/2024[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

33 Keeran Muhammed Basheer -do- 2017-18 508/COCH/2024 34 Keeran Muhammed Basheer ACIT, Central 2018-19 Circle -1, 509/COCH/2024 Calicut 35 Keeran Muhammed Basheer -do- 2019-20 510/COCH/2024 36 Keeran Muhammed Basheer -do- 2020-21 511/COCH/2024 ACIT, Central 37 Abdul Gafoor 2013-14 Circle, 512/COCH/2024 Kozhikode 38 Abdul Gafoor -do- 2015-16 513/COCH/2024 39 Abdul Gafoor -do- 2016-17 514/COCH/2024

K.ABDUL VAHEED,TALIPARAMBA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 504/COCH/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

33 Keeran Muhammed Basheer -do- 2017-18 508/COCH/2024 34 Keeran Muhammed Basheer ACIT, Central 2018-19 Circle -1, 509/COCH/2024 Calicut 35 Keeran Muhammed Basheer -do- 2019-20 510/COCH/2024 36 Keeran Muhammed Basheer -do- 2020-21 511/COCH/2024 ACIT, Central 37 Abdul Gafoor 2013-14 Circle, 512/COCH/2024 Kozhikode 38 Abdul Gafoor -do- 2015-16 513/COCH/2024 39 Abdul Gafoor -do- 2016-17 514/COCH/2024

ABC SALES CORPORATION,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 457/COCH/2024[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

33 Keeran Muhammed Basheer -do- 2017-18 508/COCH/2024 34 Keeran Muhammed Basheer ACIT, Central 2018-19 Circle -1, 509/COCH/2024 Calicut 35 Keeran Muhammed Basheer -do- 2019-20 510/COCH/2024 36 Keeran Muhammed Basheer -do- 2020-21 511/COCH/2024 ACIT, Central 37 Abdul Gafoor 2013-14 Circle, 512/COCH/2024 Kozhikode 38 Abdul Gafoor -do- 2015-16 513/COCH/2024 39 Abdul Gafoor -do- 2016-17 514/COCH/2024

ABC BUILDWARES(P) LIMITED,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1`, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 455/COCH/2024[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

33 Keeran Muhammed Basheer -do- 2017-18 508/COCH/2024 34 Keeran Muhammed Basheer ACIT, Central 2018-19 Circle -1, 509/COCH/2024 Calicut 35 Keeran Muhammed Basheer -do- 2019-20 510/COCH/2024 36 Keeran Muhammed Basheer -do- 2020-21 511/COCH/2024 ACIT, Central 37 Abdul Gafoor 2013-14 Circle, 512/COCH/2024 Kozhikode 38 Abdul Gafoor -do- 2015-16 513/COCH/2024 39 Abdul Gafoor -do- 2016-17 514/COCH/2024

ABC BUILDWAERS INDIA (P) LIMITED,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 456/COCH/2024[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

33 Keeran Muhammed Basheer -do- 2017-18 508/COCH/2024 34 Keeran Muhammed Basheer ACIT, Central 2018-19 Circle -1, 509/COCH/2024 Calicut 35 Keeran Muhammed Basheer -do- 2019-20 510/COCH/2024 36 Keeran Muhammed Basheer -do- 2020-21 511/COCH/2024 ACIT, Central 37 Abdul Gafoor 2013-14 Circle, 512/COCH/2024 Kozhikode 38 Abdul Gafoor -do- 2015-16 513/COCH/2024 39 Abdul Gafoor -do- 2016-17 514/COCH/2024

ABC BUILDWARES INDIA(P) LIMITED,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 454/COCH/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

33 Keeran Muhammed Basheer -do- 2017-18 508/COCH/2024 34 Keeran Muhammed Basheer ACIT, Central 2018-19 Circle -1, 509/COCH/2024 Calicut 35 Keeran Muhammed Basheer -do- 2019-20 510/COCH/2024 36 Keeran Muhammed Basheer -do- 2020-21 511/COCH/2024 ACIT, Central 37 Abdul Gafoor 2013-14 Circle, 512/COCH/2024 Kozhikode 38 Abdul Gafoor -do- 2015-16 513/COCH/2024 39 Abdul Gafoor -do- 2016-17 514/COCH/2024