BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “capital gains”+ Section 302clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai349Delhi265Jaipur110Karnataka106Bangalore99Chennai90Ahmedabad89Kolkata59Hyderabad57Chandigarh50Pune21Indore15Surat14Nagpur13Rajkot13Visakhapatnam9Cochin7Raipur5Lucknow4Jodhpur3SC3Panaji2Agra2Amritsar2Patna2Andhra Pradesh1Telangana1Varanasi1Dehradun1Guwahati1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)26Section 14A10Addition to Income7Disallowance6Section 92C5Natural Justice5Section 482Deduction2

M/S.KADUNA HOSPITALITY P. LTD,COCHIN vs. THE ITO, COCHIN

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for

ITA 500/COCH/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin23 Oct 2017AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri P. K. Bansal & Shri George George K.Assessment Year: 2013-14

Section 145ASection 45Section 45(5)(b)Section 48

section 32(2), amounting to Rs.5,67,2047-, against the short term capital gain for AY 2013-14;. The appellant craves, to consider each of the above grounds of appeal without prejudice to each other and craves to leave or add, alter, delete or modify all or any of the above grounds of appeal. 3. The assessee has also filed

THE KERALA MINERALS AND METALS LIMITED,KOLLAM vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 918/COCH/2024[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin16 May 2025AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri George George K., Vp & Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am Assessment Year: 2007-08 The Kerala Minerals & Metals Ltd. .......... Appellant Sankaramangalam, Chavara, Kollam 691583 [Pan: Aaact8118R] Vs. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax .......... Respondent Circle - 1, Kollam Appellant By: Shri Rajeev R., Ca Respondent By: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing: 13.05.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 16.05.2025

For Appellant: Shri Rajeev R., CAFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 143(3)

capital expenditure, Section 31 cannot be invoked. Similarly, Section 37(1) cannot also be invoked. 31. On the contention of Mr.T.Ravikumar, learned Standing Counsel that the assessee originally capitalised the expenditure, but reversed the same later, we have to point out that there cannot be any estoppel in such cases. The question whether a particular expenditure would fall within

THE DCIT, KOCHI vs. M/S.SFO TECHNOLOGIES P. LTD, ERNAKULAM

In the result, this appeal filed by Revenue in ITA

ITA 401/COCH/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin24 Feb 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri Ramit Kochar, Am

For Appellant: Smt. Jamunna Devi, Sr.DRFor Respondent: Shri Anil D. Nair& Smt. Telma
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 92C

302/- Investment yielding exempt income As on 31.03.2009 37,00,48,350/- As on 31.03.2010 69,54,80,865/- Average 53,27,64,608/- 7.2 Before proceeding further, it is pertinent to refer to the facts which are emerging from record and not controverted by ld. Sr. DR is that the assesse has earned dividend income

THE DCIT, KOCHI vs. M/S.SFO TECHNOLOGIES P. LTD, ALUVA

In the result, this appeal filed by Revenue in ITA

ITA 403/COCH/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin24 Feb 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri Ramit Kochar, Am

For Appellant: Smt. Jamunna Devi, Sr.DRFor Respondent: Shri Anil D. Nair& Smt. Telma
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 92C

302/- Investment yielding exempt income As on 31.03.2009 37,00,48,350/- As on 31.03.2010 69,54,80,865/- Average 53,27,64,608/- 7.2 Before proceeding further, it is pertinent to refer to the facts which are emerging from record and not controverted by ld. Sr. DR is that the assesse has earned dividend income

THE DCIT, KOCHI vs. M/S.SFO TECHNOLOGIES P. LTD, ALUVA

In the result, this appeal filed by Revenue in ITA

ITA 404/COCH/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin24 Feb 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri Ramit Kochar, Am

For Appellant: Smt. Jamunna Devi, Sr.DRFor Respondent: Shri Anil D. Nair& Smt. Telma
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 92C

302/- Investment yielding exempt income As on 31.03.2009 37,00,48,350/- As on 31.03.2010 69,54,80,865/- Average 53,27,64,608/- 7.2 Before proceeding further, it is pertinent to refer to the facts which are emerging from record and not controverted by ld. Sr. DR is that the assesse has earned dividend income

THE DCIT, KOCHI vs. M/S.SFO TECHNOLOGIES P. LTD, ALUVA

In the result, this appeal filed by Revenue in ITA

ITA 402/COCH/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin24 Feb 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri Ramit Kochar, Am

For Appellant: Smt. Jamunna Devi, Sr.DRFor Respondent: Shri Anil D. Nair& Smt. Telma
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 92C

302/- Investment yielding exempt income As on 31.03.2009 37,00,48,350/- As on 31.03.2010 69,54,80,865/- Average 53,27,64,608/- 7.2 Before proceeding further, it is pertinent to refer to the facts which are emerging from record and not controverted by ld. Sr. DR is that the assesse has earned dividend income

THE DCIT, KOCHI vs. M/S.SFO TECHNOLOGIES P. LTD, ALUVA

In the result, this appeal filed by Revenue in ITA

ITA 400/COCH/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin24 Feb 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri Ramit Kochar, Am

For Appellant: Smt. Jamunna Devi, Sr.DRFor Respondent: Shri Anil D. Nair& Smt. Telma
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 92C

302/- Investment yielding exempt income As on 31.03.2009 37,00,48,350/- As on 31.03.2010 69,54,80,865/- Average 53,27,64,608/- 7.2 Before proceeding further, it is pertinent to refer to the facts which are emerging from record and not controverted by ld. Sr. DR is that the assesse has earned dividend income