Search: capital gains

8 results for “capital gains”+ Section 268Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi8 Cochin8 Mumbai4 Jaipur4 Indore2 Visakhapatnam2 Lucknow1 Hyderabad1 Ahmedabad1 Patna1 Pune1 Raipur1

Key Topics

Section 153A21 Section 143(2)14 Section 1328 Section 143(3)7 Section 139(4)7 Section 143(1)7 Section 132(4)7 Section 647

THE DCIT,CEN-CIRCLE,, THRISSUR vs. SRI.T.G. CHANDRAKUMAR, THRISSUR

In the result, the Appeal by the Revenue is allowed on the aforesaid terms

ITA 67/COCH/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Apr 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora (Accountant Member), Shri Sandeep Gosain (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DRFor Respondent: Shri C.B.M. Warrier, FCA

Section 132Section 153CSection 268A

capital gain assessed did not include that on 107.63 cents, i.e., the balance out of the total land, admittedly belonging to the assessee, it was clarified by Shri Warrier, the ld. counsel for the assessee, that assessment has been on the basis of the execution of the sale deed/s, being for AY 2009-10 qua this part of land

THE DCIT,CEN-CIRCLE,, THRISSUR vs. SRI.T.G. CHANDRAKUMAR, THRISSUR

V D DEVASIA,KOTTAYAM vs. ACIT, KOTTAYAM

THE DCIT,CEN-CIRCLE,, THRISSUR vs. SRI.T.G. CHANDRAKUMAR, THRISSUR

V D DEVASIA,KOTTAYAM vs. ACIT, KOTTAYAM

V D DEVASIA,KOTTAYAM vs. ACIT, KOTTAYAM

CHENGAZHASSERIL THOMAS KURIAN,KOTTAYAM vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE KOTTAYAM, KOTTAYAM

CHENGAZHASSERIL THOMAS KURIAN,KOTTAYAM vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE KOTTAYAM, KOTTAYAM

CHENGAZHASSERIL THOMAS KURIAN,KOTTAYAM vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE KOTTAYAM, KOTTAYAM

V D DEVASIA,KOTTAYAM vs. ACIT, KOTTAYAM

V D DEVASIA,KOTTAYAM vs. ACIT, KOTTAYAM