BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

208 results for “capital gains”+ Section 22clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai4,328Delhi3,444Bangalore1,561Chennai1,168Kolkata946Ahmedabad884Jaipur684Hyderabad609Pune490Surat401Chandigarh345Indore320Karnataka299Cochin208Raipur190Visakhapatnam176Nagpur128Rajkot122Agra95Cuttack92Amritsar82Lucknow80Guwahati75SC73Calcutta73Telangana54Panaji41Dehradun30Jodhpur26Ranchi24Patna20Allahabad16Jabalpur16Kerala15Varanasi10Rajasthan6Punjab & Haryana3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Orissa2Andhra Pradesh2ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Himachal Pradesh1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Gauhati1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1

Key Topics

Section 25067Section 143(3)44Addition to Income39Section 153C28Section 153A24Section 13223Section 26319Section 14A18Section 80G16Disallowance

ACEELERATED FREEZE DRYING CO.LTD,ALAPPUZHA vs. DCIT, ALAPPUZHA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is allowed and the appeal of the

ITA 1286/COCH/2005[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin28 Jun 2019AY 2002-03

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 2Section 2(14)Section 42Section 50BSection 50B(1)

22,934.99 d. Rs. 4,243,12 (Cr) Rs.57,14,725.60 : This amount represents the loss on restatement of the ECB availed by the company from Sumitomo Bank for its working capital requirements." 10.3 Before the CIT(A), it was argued that the claim was to be allowed as the assessee had consistently followed the above method of accounting

Showing 1–20 of 208 · Page 1 of 11

...
14
Capital Gains14
Limitation/Time-bar11

DCIT, ALAPPUZHA vs. M/S ACEELERATED FREEZE DRYING CO, LTD, ALAPPUZHA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is allowed and the appeal of the

ITA 714/COCH/2008[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin28 Jun 2019AY 2002-03

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 2Section 2(14)Section 42Section 50BSection 50B(1)

22,934.99 d. Rs. 4,243,12 (Cr) Rs.57,14,725.60 : This amount represents the loss on restatement of the ECB availed by the company from Sumitomo Bank for its working capital requirements." 10.3 Before the CIT(A), it was argued that the claim was to be allowed as the assessee had consistently followed the above method of accounting

THE ACIT, COCHIN vs. M/S.PVR TOURIST HOME, COCHIN

ITA 428/COCH/2015[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin21 Mar 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Soundararajan K., Jm Assessment Year: 2012-13 Acit, Circle-1, Non-Corporate .......... Appellant Iind Floor, C.R. Building, I.S. Press Road Ernakulam 682018 Vs. Pvr Tourist Home .......... Respondent Palarivattom, Kochi 682025 [Pan: Aadfp3442Q] Appellant By: Shri Suresh Sivanandan, Cit-Dr Respondent By: Shri Mohan Pulickal, Advocate Date Of Hearing: 10.03.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 21.03.2025

For Appellant: Shri Suresh Sivanandan, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri Mohan Pulickal, Advocate
Section 143(3)Section 45(4)Section 48Section 50Section 50(1)Section 50A

capital gain u/s. 45(4) of the Act. In other words, provisions of both section 45(4) and section 50 cannot be applied to the same amount. In this regard reliance is placed on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax v. Urmila Ramesh [1998] 230 ITR 422 (SC) rendered

THE ACIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM vs. SMT.GRACY BABU, ADOOR P.O.

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 239/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

gains for the AY 2011-12. The Ld. AR submittedthat no benefit had accrued to the assessee or 14.6 We have heard the rival submissions and perused the record. This amount of Rs.8 crores each was treated as income in the hands of these two assesses which was paid by Believers Church to St. Thomas Educational Trust where Shri Jose

SMT.GRACY BABU,ADOOR P.O. vs. THE DCIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 33/COCH/2019[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

gains for the AY 2011-12. The Ld. AR submittedthat no benefit had accrued to the assessee or 14.6 We have heard the rival submissions and perused the record. This amount of Rs.8 crores each was treated as income in the hands of these two assesses which was paid by Believers Church to St. Thomas Educational Trust where Shri Jose

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 304/COCH/2019[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

gains for the AY 2011-12. The Ld. AR submittedthat no benefit had accrued to the assessee or 14.6 We have heard the rival submissions and perused the record. This amount of Rs.8 crores each was treated as income in the hands of these two assesses which was paid by Believers Church to St. Thomas Educational Trust where Shri Jose

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT,CEN- CIRCLE,, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 309/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

gains for the AY 2011-12. The Ld. AR submittedthat no benefit had accrued to the assessee or 14.6 We have heard the rival submissions and perused the record. This amount of Rs.8 crores each was treated as income in the hands of these two assesses which was paid by Believers Church to St. Thomas Educational Trust where Shri Jose

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT,CEN- CIRCLE,, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 306/COCH/2019[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

gains for the AY 2011-12. The Ld. AR submittedthat no benefit had accrued to the assessee or 14.6 We have heard the rival submissions and perused the record. This amount of Rs.8 crores each was treated as income in the hands of these two assesses which was paid by Believers Church to St. Thomas Educational Trust where Shri Jose

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 29/COCH/2019[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

gains for the AY 2011-12. The Ld. AR submittedthat no benefit had accrued to the assessee or 14.6 We have heard the rival submissions and perused the record. This amount of Rs.8 crores each was treated as income in the hands of these two assesses which was paid by Believers Church to St. Thomas Educational Trust where Shri Jose

THE ACIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM vs. SRI.JOSE THOMAS, ADOOR

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 238/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

gains for the AY 2011-12. The Ld. AR submittedthat no benefit had accrued to the assessee or 14.6 We have heard the rival submissions and perused the record. This amount of Rs.8 crores each was treated as income in the hands of these two assesses which was paid by Believers Church to St. Thomas Educational Trust where Shri Jose

SMT.GRACY BABU,ADOOR P.O. vs. THE DCIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 34/COCH/2019[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

gains for the AY 2011-12. The Ld. AR submittedthat no benefit had accrued to the assessee or 14.6 We have heard the rival submissions and perused the record. This amount of Rs.8 crores each was treated as income in the hands of these two assesses which was paid by Believers Church to St. Thomas Educational Trust where Shri Jose

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 28/COCH/2019[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

gains for the AY 2011-12. The Ld. AR submittedthat no benefit had accrued to the assessee or 14.6 We have heard the rival submissions and perused the record. This amount of Rs.8 crores each was treated as income in the hands of these two assesses which was paid by Believers Church to St. Thomas Educational Trust where Shri Jose

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 27/COCH/2019[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

gains for the AY 2011-12. The Ld. AR submittedthat no benefit had accrued to the assessee or 14.6 We have heard the rival submissions and perused the record. This amount of Rs.8 crores each was treated as income in the hands of these two assesses which was paid by Believers Church to St. Thomas Educational Trust where Shri Jose

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT,CEN- CIRCLE,, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 307/COCH/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

gains for the AY 2011-12. The Ld. AR submittedthat no benefit had accrued to the assessee or 14.6 We have heard the rival submissions and perused the record. This amount of Rs.8 crores each was treated as income in the hands of these two assesses which was paid by Believers Church to St. Thomas Educational Trust where Shri Jose

SMT.GRACY BABU,ADOOR P.O. vs. THE DCIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 32/COCH/2019[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

gains for the AY 2011-12. The Ld. AR submittedthat no benefit had accrued to the assessee or 14.6 We have heard the rival submissions and perused the record. This amount of Rs.8 crores each was treated as income in the hands of these two assesses which was paid by Believers Church to St. Thomas Educational Trust where Shri Jose

THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM vs. SRI.JOSE THOMAS, ADOOR

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 55/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

gains for the AY 2011-12. The Ld. AR submittedthat no benefit had accrued to the assessee or 14.6 We have heard the rival submissions and perused the record. This amount of Rs.8 crores each was treated as income in the hands of these two assesses which was paid by Believers Church to St. Thomas Educational Trust where Shri Jose

THE DCIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM vs. SMT.GRACY BABU, ADOOR P.O.

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 54/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

gains for the AY 2011-12. The Ld. AR submittedthat no benefit had accrued to the assessee or 14.6 We have heard the rival submissions and perused the record. This amount of Rs.8 crores each was treated as income in the hands of these two assesses which was paid by Believers Church to St. Thomas Educational Trust where Shri Jose

SMT.GRACY BABU,ADOOR P.O. vs. THE DCIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 35/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

gains for the AY 2011-12. The Ld. AR submittedthat no benefit had accrued to the assessee or 14.6 We have heard the rival submissions and perused the record. This amount of Rs.8 crores each was treated as income in the hands of these two assesses which was paid by Believers Church to St. Thomas Educational Trust where Shri Jose

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT,CEN- CIRCLE,, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 310/COCH/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

gains for the AY 2011-12. The Ld. AR submittedthat no benefit had accrued to the assessee or 14.6 We have heard the rival submissions and perused the record. This amount of Rs.8 crores each was treated as income in the hands of these two assesses which was paid by Believers Church to St. Thomas Educational Trust where Shri Jose

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 31/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

gains for the AY 2011-12. The Ld. AR submittedthat no benefit had accrued to the assessee or 14.6 We have heard the rival submissions and perused the record. This amount of Rs.8 crores each was treated as income in the hands of these two assesses which was paid by Believers Church to St. Thomas Educational Trust where Shri Jose