BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “capital gains”+ Section 207clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai419Delhi344Bangalore191Karnataka108Chennai101Jaipur94Ahmedabad91Kolkata70Chandigarh52Hyderabad41Raipur33Pune25Indore24Guwahati22Cuttack21Calcutta16Amritsar10Surat10Lucknow10SC9Telangana8Agra5Kerala5Visakhapatnam4Rajasthan4Ranchi4Jodhpur3Cochin2Jabalpur2Nagpur2Rajkot1Andhra Pradesh1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1

Key Topics

Addition to Income2

SMT.K.B.SONY,COCHIN vs. THE DCIT, COCHIN

In the result, i) The appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 320/COCH/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin24 May 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 69

capital gains, the sale consideration was shown as Rs.2.13 crores. According to the CIT(A) in a case where there is a sworn statement of the seller that the actual consideration received on sale of land is at Rs.2.13 I.T.A. Nos. 383 -386, 322-324, 319-321 &, 387-390/C/2015 crores which been shown in his return of income

CLINT MARTEL WILFRED,ERNAKULAM vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX APPEAL CIT (A) BENGALURU - 12, BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 59/COCH/2024[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Oct 2024AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K.Clint Martel Wilfred Dcit (Interational Taxation) Clint Dale, Moolankuzhy Kochi Vs. Nazreth, Ernakulam 682002 [Pan: Abnpw6970H] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Sudhakar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Girly Albert, Sr. D.R
Section 139Section 147Section 148

207/- after adjusting the amount of TDS was received as on 28-09-2010 in cash from the office of tehsildar. The same cash after reducing legal expenses was deposited in his bank as on 21st October 2010 for distribution among the legal heirs. 5. The AO based on above found that the enhanced compensation received