BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

26 results for “capital gains”+ Section 193clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai524Delhi381Kolkata147Bangalore126Ahmedabad123Jaipur120Karnataka110Chennai81Hyderabad68Indore61Chandigarh47Pune44Nagpur37Cochin26Lucknow21Calcutta21Surat21Raipur20Guwahati16Cuttack14Rajkot11SC10Visakhapatnam9Telangana7Dehradun6Rajasthan3Agra3Allahabad3Amritsar3Ranchi2Jabalpur1Andhra Pradesh1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Jodhpur1Kerala1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)28Section 37(1)26Section 26316Addition to Income16Exemption14Disallowance9Section 457Section 577Section 143(2)3Section 10(37)

THE ITO,, COCHIN vs. LATE SRI.K.SASIDHARAN REP BY SMT. K.P.SAILAJA, COCHIN

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is partly allowed for

ITA 56/COCH/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin10 Jul 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari , Am & George George K., Jm

Section 10(37)Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 54Section 54FSection 54F(4)

capital gain account Scheme to be utilized for the purchase of house property and for completion of the construction, instead deposited the same in his ordinary Savings Account. It was submitted that Section 54F being a benevolent provision intended for development of infrastructure calls for a liberal interpretation. It was submitted that beneficial provisions of law should be interpreted fairly

Showing 1–20 of 26 · Page 1 of 2

3
Deduction3
Reassessment3

M/S.POPULAR FINANCE,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-1, THIRUVALLA

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 203/COCH/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Dec 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 37(1)

193, before the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the Court has held as under: “15. What is the test which has to be applied to determine whether the income would be chargeable under the head “income from the house property” or it would be chargeable under the head “Profits and gains from business or profession", is the question

M/S POPULAR FINANCE COMPANY,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE ACIT,CIR-1,, THIRUVALLA

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 202/COCH/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Dec 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 37(1)

193, before the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the Court has held as under: “15. What is the test which has to be applied to determine whether the income would be chargeable under the head “income from the house property” or it would be chargeable under the head “Profits and gains from business or profession", is the question

M/S POPULAR FINANCE COMPANY,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE ACIT,CIR-1,, THIRUVALLA

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 204/COCH/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Dec 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 37(1)

193, before the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the Court has held as under: “15. What is the test which has to be applied to determine whether the income would be chargeable under the head “income from the house property” or it would be chargeable under the head “Profits and gains from business or profession", is the question

DCIT, THIRUVALLA vs. MAR GREGORIOUS MEMORIAL MUTHOOT MEDICAL CENTRE, KOZHENCHERRY

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical

ITA 70/COCH/2018[2003-04]Status: HeardITAT Cochin21 Feb 2019AY 2003-04

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 37(1)Section 45Section 57

193, before the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the Court has held as under: “15. What is the test which has to be applied to determine whether the income would be chargeable under the head “income from the house property” or it would be chargeable under the head “Profits and gains from business or profession", is the question

DCIT, THIRUVALLA vs. MAR GREGORIOUS MEMORIAL MUTHOOT MEDICAL CENTRE, KOZHENCHERRY

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical

ITA 71/COCH/2018[2004-05]Status: HeardITAT Cochin21 Feb 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 37(1)Section 45Section 57

193, before the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the Court has held as under: “15. What is the test which has to be applied to determine whether the income would be chargeable under the head “income from the house property” or it would be chargeable under the head “Profits and gains from business or profession", is the question

THE ACIT, THIRUVALLA vs. M/S.MUTHOOT PROPERTIES & INVESTMENTS, KOZHENCHERRY

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical

ITA 73/COCH/2018[2002-03]Status: HeardITAT Cochin21 Feb 2019AY 2002-03

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 37(1)Section 45Section 57

193, before the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the Court has held as under: “15. What is the test which has to be applied to determine whether the income would be chargeable under the head “income from the house property” or it would be chargeable under the head “Profits and gains from business or profession", is the question

DCIT, THIRUVALLA vs. MUTHOOT PROPERTIES & INVESTMENTS,, KOZHENCHERRY

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical

ITA 74/COCH/2018[2003-04]Status: HeardITAT Cochin21 Feb 2019AY 2003-04

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 37(1)Section 45Section 57

193, before the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the Court has held as under: “15. What is the test which has to be applied to determine whether the income would be chargeable under the head “income from the house property” or it would be chargeable under the head “Profits and gains from business or profession", is the question

THE ACIT, THIRUVALLA vs. M/S.MUTHOOT PROPERTIES & INVESTMENTS, KOZHENCHERRY

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical

ITA 75/COCH/2018[2005-06]Status: HeardITAT Cochin21 Feb 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 37(1)Section 45Section 57

193, before the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the Court has held as under: “15. What is the test which has to be applied to determine whether the income would be chargeable under the head “income from the house property” or it would be chargeable under the head “Profits and gains from business or profession", is the question

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-1, THIRUVALLA, THIRUVALLA vs. MAR GREGORIOUS MEMORIAL MUTHOOT MEDICAL CENTRE, PATHANAMTHITTA

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical

ITA 69/COCH/2018[2002-03]Status: HeardITAT Cochin21 Feb 2019AY 2002-03

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 37(1)Section 45Section 57

193, before the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the Court has held as under: “15. What is the test which has to be applied to determine whether the income would be chargeable under the head “income from the house property” or it would be chargeable under the head “Profits and gains from business or profession", is the question

DCIT, THIRUVALLA vs. MAR GREGORIOUS MEMORIAL MUTHOOT MEDICAL CENTRE, KOZHENCHERRY

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical

ITA 72/COCH/2018[2007-08]Status: HeardITAT Cochin21 Feb 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 37(1)Section 45Section 57

193, before the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the Court has held as under: “15. What is the test which has to be applied to determine whether the income would be chargeable under the head “income from the house property” or it would be chargeable under the head “Profits and gains from business or profession", is the question

ACIT, ERNAKULAM vs. RUBBER PARK INDIA PVT. LTD., COCHIN

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical

ITA 353/COCH/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin06 May 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 37

193/- and Rs.35,70,645/- respectively for AY 2012-13 & AY 2013-14) to be retained as stock in trade, since the said amounts related to stock of land not yet sold. The CIT(A) observed that Clause No.2 of the Lease Deed with KINFRA stipulates that if any additional premium payable will get enhanced proportionately to that extent

THE ACIT, COCHIN vs. M/S.RUBBER PARK INDIA P. LTD, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue are partly allowed for statistical

ITA 135/COCH/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin06 May 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 37

193/- and Rs.35,70,645/- respectively for AY 2012-13 & AY 2013-14) to be retained as stock in trade, since the said amounts related to stock of land not yet sold. The CIT(A) observed that Clause No.2 of the Lease Deed with KINFRA stipulates that if any additional premium payable will get enhanced proportionately to that extent

SMT. T.C. USHA,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 45/COCH/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

gain in the books of sister concern(s).According to the ld. AR, anyaddition under the head "income from business" becomes revenue neutralin (2010) 236 CTR (SC) 113. it was argued that when this judgment was brought to his notice by filing a copy, the Assessing Officer took a dramatic U turn to hold that units were independent. Hence

M/S. VIJAYALAXMICASHEW CO.,,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 47/COCH/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2008-09

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

gain in the books of sister concern(s).According to the ld. AR, anyaddition under the head "income from business" becomes revenue neutralin (2010) 236 CTR (SC) 113. it was argued that when this judgment was brought to his notice by filing a copy, the Assessing Officer took a dramatic U turn to hold that units were independent. Hence

M/S. VIJAYALAXMICASHEW CO.,,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 48/COCH/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

gain in the books of sister concern(s).According to the ld. AR, anyaddition under the head "income from business" becomes revenue neutralin (2010) 236 CTR (SC) 113. it was argued that when this judgment was brought to his notice by filing a copy, the Assessing Officer took a dramatic U turn to hold that units were independent. Hence

SMT. T.C. USHA,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 44/COCH/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

gain in the books of sister concern(s).According to the ld. AR, anyaddition under the head "income from business" becomes revenue neutralin (2010) 236 CTR (SC) 113. it was argued that when this judgment was brought to his notice by filing a copy, the Assessing Officer took a dramatic U turn to hold that units were independent. Hence

M/S. VIJAYALAXMICASHEW CO.,,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 49/COCH/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

gain in the books of sister concern(s).According to the ld. AR, anyaddition under the head "income from business" becomes revenue neutralin (2010) 236 CTR (SC) 113. it was argued that when this judgment was brought to his notice by filing a copy, the Assessing Officer took a dramatic U turn to hold that units were independent. Hence

SRI.R.PRAKASH,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 40/COCH/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

gain in the books of sister concern(s).According to the ld. AR, anyaddition under the head "income from business" becomes revenue neutralin (2010) 236 CTR (SC) 113. it was argued that when this judgment was brought to his notice by filing a copy, the Assessing Officer took a dramatic U turn to hold that units were independent. Hence

SRI.R. PRATAP,KOLLAM vs. THE ACIT, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessees in ITA Nos

ITA 39/COCH/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

gain in the books of sister concern(s).According to the ld. AR, anyaddition under the head "income from business" becomes revenue neutralin (2010) 236 CTR (SC) 113. it was argued that when this judgment was brought to his notice by filing a copy, the Assessing Officer took a dramatic U turn to hold that units were independent. Hence