BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “capital gains”+ Section 16Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi96Mumbai73Chennai25Surat21Bangalore21Kolkata20Hyderabad18Pune17Nagpur15Jaipur12Chandigarh9Ahmedabad7Rajkot7Cochin4Amritsar4Indore3Jodhpur3Lucknow2Varanasi2Raipur2Visakhapatnam1Cuttack1Patna1Ranchi1SC1Agra1

Key Topics

Survey u/s 133A4Section 16A(6)3Section 55A3Capital Gains3Comparables/TP3

JAYALAKSHMI C MENON,THRISSUR vs. DCIT INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, KOCHI

The appeal of the assessee is hereby partly allowed

ITA 615/COCH/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Oct 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K.Satish Kishore C. Menon Dcit (International Taxation) Krishna Vihar, Kuruvath Lane Kochi Sankarayya Road Vs. Thrissur 680004 [Pan: Bwrpm3657H] (Appellant) (Respondent) Jayalakshmi C. Menon Dcit (International Taxation) Krishna Vihar, Kuruvath Lane Kochi Sankarayya Road Vs. Thrissur 680004 [Pan: Bvypm1772M] (Appellant) (Respondent) Rajeshwari C. Menon Dcit (International Taxation) Krishna Vihar, Kuruvath Lane Kochi Sankarayya Road Vs. Thrissur 680004 [Pan: Bvypm1866N] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri K. Kittu, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 16A(6)Section 55A

capital gain in the hands of the assessee at Rs. 7,50,40,460/- only. Aggrieved assessee preferred appeal before the learned CIT(A) who partly allowed the ground of appeal of the assessee by observing as under: “4.2.3 The AO has since obtained a valuation report from the Assistant Valuation Officer, which gives

RAJESHWARI C MENON,THRISSUR vs. DCIT ,INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, KOCHI

The appeal of the assessee is hereby partly allowed

ITA 616/COCH/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Oct 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K.Satish Kishore C. Menon Dcit (International Taxation) Krishna Vihar, Kuruvath Lane Kochi Sankarayya Road Vs. Thrissur 680004 [Pan: Bwrpm3657H] (Appellant) (Respondent) Jayalakshmi C. Menon Dcit (International Taxation) Krishna Vihar, Kuruvath Lane Kochi Sankarayya Road Vs. Thrissur 680004 [Pan: Bvypm1772M] (Appellant) (Respondent) Rajeshwari C. Menon Dcit (International Taxation) Krishna Vihar, Kuruvath Lane Kochi Sankarayya Road Vs. Thrissur 680004 [Pan: Bvypm1866N] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri K. Kittu, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 16A(6)Section 55A

capital gain in the hands of the assessee at Rs. 7,50,40,460/- only. Aggrieved assessee preferred appeal before the learned CIT(A) who partly allowed the ground of appeal of the assessee by observing as under: “4.2.3 The AO has since obtained a valuation report from the Assistant Valuation Officer, which gives

SATISH KISHORE C MENON,THRISSUR vs. DCIT INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, KOCHI

The appeal of the assessee is hereby partly allowed

ITA 614/COCH/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Oct 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K.Satish Kishore C. Menon Dcit (International Taxation) Krishna Vihar, Kuruvath Lane Kochi Sankarayya Road Vs. Thrissur 680004 [Pan: Bwrpm3657H] (Appellant) (Respondent) Jayalakshmi C. Menon Dcit (International Taxation) Krishna Vihar, Kuruvath Lane Kochi Sankarayya Road Vs. Thrissur 680004 [Pan: Bvypm1772M] (Appellant) (Respondent) Rajeshwari C. Menon Dcit (International Taxation) Krishna Vihar, Kuruvath Lane Kochi Sankarayya Road Vs. Thrissur 680004 [Pan: Bvypm1866N] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri K. Kittu, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 16A(6)Section 55A

capital gain in the hands of the assessee at Rs. 7,50,40,460/- only. Aggrieved assessee preferred appeal before the learned CIT(A) who partly allowed the ground of appeal of the assessee by observing as under: “4.2.3 The AO has since obtained a valuation report from the Assistant Valuation Officer, which gives

SMT.K.B.SONY,COCHIN vs. THE DCIT, COCHIN

In the result, i) The appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 320/COCH/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin24 May 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 69

16A. According to the Ld. AR, the company did not seek any advice or entrusted any assignment, hence no service was provided, but that does not change the character of the agreement and nature of payment. The assessee received the fee as per the contract and he is supposed to make himself available whenever the company asks for, which