BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “capital gains”+ Section 16Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi54Mumbai51Nagpur15Hyderabad14Jaipur9Kolkata8Pune7Bangalore5Cochin3Amritsar3Jodhpur3Ahmedabad2Chandigarh2Chennai2Lucknow2Raipur2Patna1Cuttack1Visakhapatnam1Rajkot1Surat1Indore1

Key Topics

Section 16A(6)3Section 55A3Capital Gains3Survey u/s 133A3Comparables/TP3

SATISH KISHORE C MENON,THRISSUR vs. DCIT INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, KOCHI

The appeal of the assessee is hereby partly allowed

ITA 614/COCH/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Oct 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K.Satish Kishore C. Menon Dcit (International Taxation) Krishna Vihar, Kuruvath Lane Kochi Sankarayya Road Vs. Thrissur 680004 [Pan: Bwrpm3657H] (Appellant) (Respondent) Jayalakshmi C. Menon Dcit (International Taxation) Krishna Vihar, Kuruvath Lane Kochi Sankarayya Road Vs. Thrissur 680004 [Pan: Bvypm1772M] (Appellant) (Respondent) Rajeshwari C. Menon Dcit (International Taxation) Krishna Vihar, Kuruvath Lane Kochi Sankarayya Road Vs. Thrissur 680004 [Pan: Bvypm1866N] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri K. Kittu, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 16A(6)Section 55A

capital gain in the hands of the assessee at Rs. 7,50,40,460/- only. Aggrieved assessee preferred appeal before the learned CIT(A) who partly allowed the ground of appeal of the assessee by observing as under: “4.2.3 The AO has since obtained a valuation report from the Assistant Valuation Officer, which gives

JAYALAKSHMI C MENON,THRISSUR vs. DCIT INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, KOCHI

The appeal of the assessee is hereby partly allowed

ITA 615/COCH/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Oct 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K.Satish Kishore C. Menon Dcit (International Taxation) Krishna Vihar, Kuruvath Lane Kochi Sankarayya Road Vs. Thrissur 680004 [Pan: Bwrpm3657H] (Appellant) (Respondent) Jayalakshmi C. Menon Dcit (International Taxation) Krishna Vihar, Kuruvath Lane Kochi Sankarayya Road Vs. Thrissur 680004 [Pan: Bvypm1772M] (Appellant) (Respondent) Rajeshwari C. Menon Dcit (International Taxation) Krishna Vihar, Kuruvath Lane Kochi Sankarayya Road Vs. Thrissur 680004 [Pan: Bvypm1866N] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri K. Kittu, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 16A(6)Section 55A

capital gain in the hands of the assessee at Rs. 7,50,40,460/- only. Aggrieved assessee preferred appeal before the learned CIT(A) who partly allowed the ground of appeal of the assessee by observing as under: “4.2.3 The AO has since obtained a valuation report from the Assistant Valuation Officer, which gives

RAJESHWARI C MENON,THRISSUR vs. DCIT ,INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, KOCHI

The appeal of the assessee is hereby partly allowed

ITA 616/COCH/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Oct 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K.Satish Kishore C. Menon Dcit (International Taxation) Krishna Vihar, Kuruvath Lane Kochi Sankarayya Road Vs. Thrissur 680004 [Pan: Bwrpm3657H] (Appellant) (Respondent) Jayalakshmi C. Menon Dcit (International Taxation) Krishna Vihar, Kuruvath Lane Kochi Sankarayya Road Vs. Thrissur 680004 [Pan: Bvypm1772M] (Appellant) (Respondent) Rajeshwari C. Menon Dcit (International Taxation) Krishna Vihar, Kuruvath Lane Kochi Sankarayya Road Vs. Thrissur 680004 [Pan: Bvypm1866N] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri K. Kittu, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 16A(6)Section 55A

capital gain in the hands of the assessee at Rs. 7,50,40,460/- only. Aggrieved assessee preferred appeal before the learned CIT(A) who partly allowed the ground of appeal of the assessee by observing as under: “4.2.3 The AO has since obtained a valuation report from the Assistant Valuation Officer, which gives