BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

76 results for “capital gains”+ Section 156clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai535Delhi533Bangalore241Chennai164Ahmedabad139Karnataka119Jaipur117Hyderabad105Kolkata97Cochin76Raipur75Chandigarh57Calcutta52Pune52Panaji39Indore34Surat22Lucknow20Nagpur20SC15Agra14Cuttack10Guwahati10Rajkot9Visakhapatnam8Telangana7Dehradun6Amritsar5Ranchi5Varanasi5Jabalpur3Rajasthan3Allahabad2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Orissa1Gauhati1Patna1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Andhra Pradesh1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 250115Capital Gains12Section 2(24)(vi)8Section 488Addition to Income8Section 143(3)6Section 1325Section 153A5Business Income4

THE ITO, WARD-2, THODUPUZHA, THODUPUZHA vs. SRI.MARTIN JOHNY, KOTHAMANGALAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the appeals

ITA 354/COCH/2006[1999-2000]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 Jan 2019AY 1999-2000

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 2(24)(vi)Section 48

section 45(3) which is the only enabling provision to charge capital gains as income of the assessee in respect of transfer of capital asset to the firm and specifically the deeming provision therein to adopt the amount recorded in books of the firm as full value of consideration. According to the Ld. AR, the Apex Court's judgment

THE ACIT, CIR-1(1), ERNAKULAM, ERNAKULAM vs. SRI.JOSE MATHEW, M/S.E.V.MTHAI & SONS, KOTHAMANGALAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the appeals

ITA 450/COCH/2007[1999-2000]Status: Disposed

Showing 1–20 of 76 · Page 1 of 4

Section 144C(5)2
Section 92C(2)2
Transfer Pricing2
ITAT Cochin
17 Jan 2019
AY 1999-2000

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 2(24)(vi)Section 48

section 45(3) which is the only enabling provision to charge capital gains as income of the assessee in respect of transfer of capital asset to the firm and specifically the deeming provision therein to adopt the amount recorded in books of the firm as full value of consideration. According to the Ld. AR, the Apex Court's judgment

THE ITO, WD-2, THODUPUZHA, THODUPUZHA vs. SRI.E.J.SONY, KOTHAMANGALAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the appeals

ITA 355/COCH/2006[1999-2000]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 Jan 2019AY 1999-2000

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 2(24)(vi)Section 48

section 45(3) which is the only enabling provision to charge capital gains as income of the assessee in respect of transfer of capital asset to the firm and specifically the deeming provision therein to adopt the amount recorded in books of the firm as full value of consideration. According to the Ld. AR, the Apex Court's judgment

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1), ERNAKULAM, ERNAKULAM vs. SRI.E.M.PAUL, EDAKATTUKUDIYIL, KOTHAMANGALAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the appeals

ITA 449/COCH/2007[1999-2000]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 Jan 2019AY 1999-2000

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 2(24)(vi)Section 48

section 45(3) which is the only enabling provision to charge capital gains as income of the assessee in respect of transfer of capital asset to the firm and specifically the deeming provision therein to adopt the amount recorded in books of the firm as full value of consideration. According to the Ld. AR, the Apex Court's judgment

THEACIT, CIR-1(1),EKM, ERNAKULAM vs. SRI.E.M.JOHNY, KOTHAMANGALAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the appeals

ITA 453/COCH/2007[1999-2000]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 Jan 2019AY 1999-2000

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 2(24)(vi)Section 48

section 45(3) which is the only enabling provision to charge capital gains as income of the assessee in respect of transfer of capital asset to the firm and specifically the deeming provision therein to adopt the amount recorded in books of the firm as full value of consideration. According to the Ld. AR, the Apex Court's judgment

THE ITO, WD-2, THODUPUZHA, THODUPUZHA vs. SRI.TOMY MATHEW PARTNER OF MATHAI SONS, KOTHAMANGALAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the appeals

ITA 419/COCH/2007[1999-2000]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 Jan 2019AY 1999-2000

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 2(24)(vi)Section 48

section 45(3) which is the only enabling provision to charge capital gains as income of the assessee in respect of transfer of capital asset to the firm and specifically the deeming provision therein to adopt the amount recorded in books of the firm as full value of consideration. According to the Ld. AR, the Apex Court's judgment

SRI.ESSA ISMAIL SAIT,ERNAKULAM vs. THE ACIT,CIR-2(1),, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the appeals

ITA 605/COCH/2005[1999-2000]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 Jan 2019AY 1999-2000

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 2(24)(vi)Section 48

section 45(3) which is the only enabling provision to charge capital gains as income of the assessee in respect of transfer of capital asset to the firm and specifically the deeming provision therein to adopt the amount recorded in books of the firm as full value of consideration. According to the Ld. AR, the Apex Court's judgment

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1), ERNAKULAM, ERNAKULAM vs. SRI.MATHAI XAVIER, KOTHAMANGALAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the appeals

ITA 451/COCH/2007[1999-2000]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 Jan 2019AY 1999-2000

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 2(24)(vi)Section 48

section 45(3) which is the only enabling provision to charge capital gains as income of the assessee in respect of transfer of capital asset to the firm and specifically the deeming provision therein to adopt the amount recorded in books of the firm as full value of consideration. According to the Ld. AR, the Apex Court's judgment

THE ACIT, TRICHUR vs. SRI.ARUN MAJEED, THRISSUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 494/COCH/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin06 Feb 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

156) I.T.A. Nos.494 - 497/Coch/2018 9.6 It was submitted that the case of the assessee was also covered by the recent decisions, as given below:- i. Principal CIT vs. Rungta Properties Ltd. (2018) 403 ITR 234 (Cal.) It is held that the gain from transactions of sale of flats are not adventure in nature of trade, since no material has been

THE ACIT, TRICHUR vs. SRI.ARUN MAJEED, THRISSUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 496/COCH/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin06 Feb 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

156) I.T.A. Nos.494 - 497/Coch/2018 9.6 It was submitted that the case of the assessee was also covered by the recent decisions, as given below:- i. Principal CIT vs. Rungta Properties Ltd. (2018) 403 ITR 234 (Cal.) It is held that the gain from transactions of sale of flats are not adventure in nature of trade, since no material has been

THE ACIT, TRICHUR vs. SRI.ARUN MAJEED, THRISSUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 495/COCH/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin06 Feb 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

156) I.T.A. Nos.494 - 497/Coch/2018 9.6 It was submitted that the case of the assessee was also covered by the recent decisions, as given below:- i. Principal CIT vs. Rungta Properties Ltd. (2018) 403 ITR 234 (Cal.) It is held that the gain from transactions of sale of flats are not adventure in nature of trade, since no material has been

THE ACIT, TRICHUR vs. SRI.ARUN MAJEED, THRISSUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 497/COCH/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin06 Feb 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

156) I.T.A. Nos.494 - 497/Coch/2018 9.6 It was submitted that the case of the assessee was also covered by the recent decisions, as given below:- i. Principal CIT vs. Rungta Properties Ltd. (2018) 403 ITR 234 (Cal.) It is held that the gain from transactions of sale of flats are not adventure in nature of trade, since no material has been

THEKKEDATHU RAMAN PILLAI BALACHANDRAN,PACHALAM, KOCHI vs. ITO, NON. CORP. WARD-1(1), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal of assessee bearing ITA No

ITA 634/COCH/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin31 Oct 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Anikesh Banerjee, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Aravind and Shri Anil D. Nair, AdvFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 250

section 143(3) of the Act. The Ld. AO rejected the long-term capital gain on sale of agricultural property Rs.1,41,14,718/- and treated it as taxable long term capital gain. Being aggrieved the assessee filed an appeal before the ld. CIT(A). The ld. CIT(A)passed a speaking order without considering the ground of the assessee

KAKKOTTAKATH NADUVILAPURAYIL JUNAID,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 500/COCH/2024[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

gain, and with no indication that these credits were related to investments in the foreign entity, the argument stands that these transactions were purely for charitable purposes. The lack of material evidence to suggest otherwise leads to the conclusion that these payments do not support the revenue’s claim of unaccounted investment. 20.20 Without prejudice to the above finding

KAKKOTTAKATH NADUVILAPURAYIL JUNAID,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 498/COCH/2024[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

gain, and with no indication that these credits were related to investments in the foreign entity, the argument stands that these transactions were purely for charitable purposes. The lack of material evidence to suggest otherwise leads to the conclusion that these payments do not support the revenue’s claim of unaccounted investment. 20.20 Without prejudice to the above finding

ABC BUILDWARES(P) LIMITED,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1`, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 455/COCH/2024[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

gain, and with no indication that these credits were related to investments in the foreign entity, the argument stands that these transactions were purely for charitable purposes. The lack of material evidence to suggest otherwise leads to the conclusion that these payments do not support the revenue’s claim of unaccounted investment. 20.20 Without prejudice to the above finding

KAKKOTTAKATH NADUVILAPURAYIL JUNAID,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 497/COCH/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

gain, and with no indication that these credits were related to investments in the foreign entity, the argument stands that these transactions were purely for charitable purposes. The lack of material evidence to suggest otherwise leads to the conclusion that these payments do not support the revenue’s claim of unaccounted investment. 20.20 Without prejudice to the above finding

K.ABDUL VAHEED,TALIPARAMBA vs. ACIT(CENTRAL CIRCLE-1), KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 501/COCH/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

gain, and with no indication that these credits were related to investments in the foreign entity, the argument stands that these transactions were purely for charitable purposes. The lack of material evidence to suggest otherwise leads to the conclusion that these payments do not support the revenue’s claim of unaccounted investment. 20.20 Without prejudice to the above finding

ABC BUILDWARES INDIA(P) LIMITED,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 454/COCH/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

gain, and with no indication that these credits were related to investments in the foreign entity, the argument stands that these transactions were purely for charitable purposes. The lack of material evidence to suggest otherwise leads to the conclusion that these payments do not support the revenue’s claim of unaccounted investment. 20.20 Without prejudice to the above finding

RUCHIT PARIMAL ASHAR,SANALA ROAD, MORBI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CALICUT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 505/COCH/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

gain, and with no indication that these credits were related to investments in the foreign entity, the argument stands that these transactions were purely for charitable purposes. The lack of material evidence to suggest otherwise leads to the conclusion that these payments do not support the revenue’s claim of unaccounted investment. 20.20 Without prejudice to the above finding