BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

73 results for “capital gains”+ Section 150(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai797Delhi612Bangalore311Ahmedabad210Jaipur199Chennai172Kolkata147Karnataka130Hyderabad117Indore79Cochin73Chandigarh73Pune66Calcutta50Cuttack48Raipur38Nagpur33Surat32Lucknow24Guwahati20Rajkot17Amritsar16Visakhapatnam14SC11Telangana8Allahabad5Dehradun4Patna4Jodhpur3Rajasthan3Panaji2Ranchi2Punjab & Haryana1Andhra Pradesh1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 250115Section 143(3)9Capital Gains8Addition to Income7Section 40A(2)(b)6Section 406Business Income6Reassessment6Disallowance6

THE ACIT, TRICHUR vs. SRI.ARUN MAJEED, THRISSUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 494/COCH/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin06 Feb 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

150) "Reliance is also placed on the decision of the Hon 'ble Supreme Court in G. Venkataswami Naidu and Co. V. CIT [1959] 35 ITR 594 (SC)". (Page No. 151) “The Supreme Court distinguished an investment from an adventure in the nature of trade as under:- (page 609 of 35 ITR).” (Page No. 154) "Cases of realization of investments consisting

THE ACIT, TRICHUR vs. SRI.ARUN MAJEED, THRISSUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 496/COCH/2018[2013-14]Status: Disposed

Showing 1–20 of 73 · Page 1 of 4

Section 50B5
Section 1324
Section 153A4
ITAT Cochin
06 Feb 2019
AY 2013-14

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

150) "Reliance is also placed on the decision of the Hon 'ble Supreme Court in G. Venkataswami Naidu and Co. V. CIT [1959] 35 ITR 594 (SC)". (Page No. 151) “The Supreme Court distinguished an investment from an adventure in the nature of trade as under:- (page 609 of 35 ITR).” (Page No. 154) "Cases of realization of investments consisting

THE ACIT, TRICHUR vs. SRI.ARUN MAJEED, THRISSUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 497/COCH/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin06 Feb 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

150) "Reliance is also placed on the decision of the Hon 'ble Supreme Court in G. Venkataswami Naidu and Co. V. CIT [1959] 35 ITR 594 (SC)". (Page No. 151) “The Supreme Court distinguished an investment from an adventure in the nature of trade as under:- (page 609 of 35 ITR).” (Page No. 154) "Cases of realization of investments consisting

THE ACIT, TRICHUR vs. SRI.ARUN MAJEED, THRISSUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 495/COCH/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin06 Feb 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153A

150) "Reliance is also placed on the decision of the Hon 'ble Supreme Court in G. Venkataswami Naidu and Co. V. CIT [1959] 35 ITR 594 (SC)". (Page No. 151) “The Supreme Court distinguished an investment from an adventure in the nature of trade as under:- (page 609 of 35 ITR).” (Page No. 154) "Cases of realization of investments consisting

M/S.AMALGAM FOODS LTD,KOCHI vs. THE DCIT, CIR-1, ALLEPPEY, ALLEPPEY

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 110/COCH/2018[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin09 Apr 2019AY 2003-04

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 2Section 43BSection 50(2)Section 50B

gain but only as business income. 6.1 In support of his contention, the learned A.R. relied on the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Equinox Solution Pvt. Ltd. 150 DTR 137 wherein it was held as under: "11. In our considered opinion, the case of the respondent (assessee) does not fall within the four corners of section

BENEESH KUMAR,KOCHI vs. ITO, NON CORP WARD 1(1), KOCHI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 1161/COCH/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin29 Apr 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Soundararajan K., Jm Assessment Year: 2013-14 Beneesh Kumar .......... Appellant Madathuparambu House, Thattzham Road Vaduthala, Kochi 682023 [Pan: Agipb7548Q] Vs. The Income Tax Officer .......... Respondent Non-Corporate Ward, Kochi Appellant By: Shri Ramesh Cherian, Advocate Respondent By: Shri Omanakutan, Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing: 19.03.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 29.04.2025

For Appellant: Shri Ramesh Cherian, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Omanakutan, Sr. D.R
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 282(1)Section 54Section 54F

150/-. Against the said return of income, the assessment was completed by the Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), NC, Kochi (hereinafter called "the AO") vide order dated 25.02.2016 passed u/s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). While doing so, the AO disallowed the claim for deduction u/s. 54 of the Act. 3. The factual background

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOTTAYAM vs. THOMAS CHANDY, KANJIRAPALLY

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 243/COCH/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin31 Jul 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm Assessment Year: 2012-13 Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax .......... Appellant Public Library Buiulding, Shastri Road Kottayam 686001 [Pan: Adzpc3009P] Vs. Thomas Chandy .......... Respondent Karimpanal Post, Post Box No. Vizhikithode, Kanjirpally 686507 Appellant By: Smt. Veni Raj, Cit-Dr Respondent By: Shri R. Krishnan, Ca Date Of Hearing: 12.06.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 31.07.2025

For Appellant: Smt. Veni Raj, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri R. Krishnan, CA
Section 148Section 2(47)

150 cents in Kakkanad, Ernakulam. The appellant executed a registered power of attorney vide document No. 375/2011 on 23.11.2011 for development of that land in favour of M/s Skyline Foundations & Structures Pvt. Ltd. In addition to the execution of power of attorney, the appellant also entered into an agreement with builder. The AO, after making reference to some clauses

ABC BUILDWARES(P) LIMITED,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1`, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 455/COCH/2024[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

1 to 233, with written submissions spanning 15 pages. The AR contended that there was no actual investment made by the shareholders of the entities, namely M/s Bathx Bathware India Pvt Ltd, M/s ABC Project W.L.L.- Doha Qatar, and M/s ABC Impex Africa Ltd- Kampala Uganda, in M/s ABC Mercantile FZC. This assertion was supported by the list of shareholders

ABC BUILDWARES INDIA(P) LIMITED,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 454/COCH/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

1 to 233, with written submissions spanning 15 pages. The AR contended that there was no actual investment made by the shareholders of the entities, namely M/s Bathx Bathware India Pvt Ltd, M/s ABC Project W.L.L.- Doha Qatar, and M/s ABC Impex Africa Ltd- Kampala Uganda, in M/s ABC Mercantile FZC. This assertion was supported by the list of shareholders

RUCHIT PARIMAL ASHAR,SANALA ROAD, MORBI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CALICUT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 505/COCH/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

1 to 233, with written submissions spanning 15 pages. The AR contended that there was no actual investment made by the shareholders of the entities, namely M/s Bathx Bathware India Pvt Ltd, M/s ABC Project W.L.L.- Doha Qatar, and M/s ABC Impex Africa Ltd- Kampala Uganda, in M/s ABC Mercantile FZC. This assertion was supported by the list of shareholders

K.ABDUL VAHEED,TALIPARAMBA vs. ACIT(CENTRAL CIRCLE-1), KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 501/COCH/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

1 to 233, with written submissions spanning 15 pages. The AR contended that there was no actual investment made by the shareholders of the entities, namely M/s Bathx Bathware India Pvt Ltd, M/s ABC Project W.L.L.- Doha Qatar, and M/s ABC Impex Africa Ltd- Kampala Uganda, in M/s ABC Mercantile FZC. This assertion was supported by the list of shareholders

KAKKOTTAKATH NADUVILAPURAYIL JUNAID,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 497/COCH/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

1 to 233, with written submissions spanning 15 pages. The AR contended that there was no actual investment made by the shareholders of the entities, namely M/s Bathx Bathware India Pvt Ltd, M/s ABC Project W.L.L.- Doha Qatar, and M/s ABC Impex Africa Ltd- Kampala Uganda, in M/s ABC Mercantile FZC. This assertion was supported by the list of shareholders

KAKKOTTAKATH NADUVILAPURAYIL JUNAID,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 498/COCH/2024[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

1 to 233, with written submissions spanning 15 pages. The AR contended that there was no actual investment made by the shareholders of the entities, namely M/s Bathx Bathware India Pvt Ltd, M/s ABC Project W.L.L.- Doha Qatar, and M/s ABC Impex Africa Ltd- Kampala Uganda, in M/s ABC Mercantile FZC. This assertion was supported by the list of shareholders

KAKKOTTAKATH NADUVILAPURAYIL JUNAID,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 500/COCH/2024[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

1 to 233, with written submissions spanning 15 pages. The AR contended that there was no actual investment made by the shareholders of the entities, namely M/s Bathx Bathware India Pvt Ltd, M/s ABC Project W.L.L.- Doha Qatar, and M/s ABC Impex Africa Ltd- Kampala Uganda, in M/s ABC Mercantile FZC. This assertion was supported by the list of shareholders

KAKKOTTAKATH NADUVILAPURAYIL JUNAID,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 499/COCH/2024[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

1 to 233, with written submissions spanning 15 pages. The AR contended that there was no actual investment made by the shareholders of the entities, namely M/s Bathx Bathware India Pvt Ltd, M/s ABC Project W.L.L.- Doha Qatar, and M/s ABC Impex Africa Ltd- Kampala Uganda, in M/s ABC Mercantile FZC. This assertion was supported by the list of shareholders

K.ABDUL VAHEED,TALIPARAMBA vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, , KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 502/COCH/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

1 to 233, with written submissions spanning 15 pages. The AR contended that there was no actual investment made by the shareholders of the entities, namely M/s Bathx Bathware India Pvt Ltd, M/s ABC Project W.L.L.- Doha Qatar, and M/s ABC Impex Africa Ltd- Kampala Uganda, in M/s ABC Mercantile FZC. This assertion was supported by the list of shareholders

A B C SALES CORPORATION ,KANNUR vs. ITO, CIRCLE-1, KANNUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 404/COCH/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

1 to 233, with written submissions spanning 15 pages. The AR contended that there was no actual investment made by the shareholders of the entities, namely M/s Bathx Bathware India Pvt Ltd, M/s ABC Project W.L.L.- Doha Qatar, and M/s ABC Impex Africa Ltd- Kampala Uganda, in M/s ABC Mercantile FZC. This assertion was supported by the list of shareholders

KODIYIL MUHAMMED MADANI, PARTNER(ABC SALAES CORPORATION),TALIPARAMBA vs. ACIT , CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 523/COCH/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

1 to 233, with written submissions spanning 15 pages. The AR contended that there was no actual investment made by the shareholders of the entities, namely M/s Bathx Bathware India Pvt Ltd, M/s ABC Project W.L.L.- Doha Qatar, and M/s ABC Impex Africa Ltd- Kampala Uganda, in M/s ABC Mercantile FZC. This assertion was supported by the list of shareholders

KODIYIL MUHAMMED MADANI PARTNER, ABC SALES CORPORATION,TALIPARAMBA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 836/COCH/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

1 to 233, with written submissions spanning 15 pages. The AR contended that there was no actual investment made by the shareholders of the entities, namely M/s Bathx Bathware India Pvt Ltd, M/s ABC Project W.L.L.- Doha Qatar, and M/s ABC Impex Africa Ltd- Kampala Uganda, in M/s ABC Mercantile FZC. This assertion was supported by the list of shareholders

KODIYIL MUHAMMED MADANI, PARTNER (ABC SALES CORPORATION),TALIPARAMBA vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CALICUT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 524/COCH/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

1 to 233, with written submissions spanning 15 pages. The AR contended that there was no actual investment made by the shareholders of the entities, namely M/s Bathx Bathware India Pvt Ltd, M/s ABC Project W.L.L.- Doha Qatar, and M/s ABC Impex Africa Ltd- Kampala Uganda, in M/s ABC Mercantile FZC. This assertion was supported by the list of shareholders