BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

67 results for “capital gains”+ Section 150clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai417Delhi274Jaipur123Ahmedabad106Bangalore90Chennai86Hyderabad70Cochin67Nagpur45Chandigarh36Indore35Raipur33Pune29Surat25Kolkata22Lucknow19SC17Cuttack14Amritsar12Rajkot10Guwahati10Visakhapatnam8Dehradun4Patna4Allahabad3Jodhpur2Ranchi1

Key Topics

Section 250115Section 40A(2)(b)6Section 406Reassessment6Disallowance6Section 2(47)4Section 143(3)3House Property3Section 54F2Section 268A

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOTTAYAM vs. THOMAS CHANDY, KANJIRAPALLY

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 243/COCH/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin31 Jul 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm Assessment Year: 2012-13 Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax .......... Appellant Public Library Buiulding, Shastri Road Kottayam 686001 [Pan: Adzpc3009P] Vs. Thomas Chandy .......... Respondent Karimpanal Post, Post Box No. Vizhikithode, Kanjirpally 686507 Appellant By: Smt. Veni Raj, Cit-Dr Respondent By: Shri R. Krishnan, Ca Date Of Hearing: 12.06.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 31.07.2025

For Appellant: Smt. Veni Raj, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri R. Krishnan, CA
Section 148Section 2(47)

150 cents in Kakkanad, Ernakulam. The appellant executed a registered power of attorney vide document No. 375/2011 on 23.11.2011 for development of that land in favour of M/s Skyline Foundations & Structures Pvt. Ltd. In addition to the execution of power of attorney, the appellant also entered into an agreement with builder. The AO, after making reference to some clauses

Showing 1–20 of 67 · Page 1 of 4

2
Section 1482
Capital Gains2

BENEESH KUMAR,KOCHI vs. ITO, NON CORP WARD 1(1), KOCHI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 1161/COCH/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin29 Apr 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Soundararajan K., Jm Assessment Year: 2013-14 Beneesh Kumar .......... Appellant Madathuparambu House, Thattzham Road Vaduthala, Kochi 682023 [Pan: Agipb7548Q] Vs. The Income Tax Officer .......... Respondent Non-Corporate Ward, Kochi Appellant By: Shri Ramesh Cherian, Advocate Respondent By: Shri Omanakutan, Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing: 19.03.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 29.04.2025

For Appellant: Shri Ramesh Cherian, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Omanakutan, Sr. D.R
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 282(1)Section 54Section 54F

150/-. Against the said return of income, the assessment was completed by the Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), NC, Kochi (hereinafter called "the AO") vide order dated 25.02.2016 passed u/s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). While doing so, the AO disallowed the claim for deduction u/s. 54 of the Act. 3. The factual background

THE ACIT, CORP CIRCLE-1(2), KOCHI vs. M/S.KNOWELL REALTORS INDIA P. LTD, KOCHI

In the result, the Revenue’s appeals are allowed

ITA 193/COCH/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin25 Sept 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am &Shri Manomohan Das, Jm

For Appellant: Sri. Santosh P. Abraham, AdvFor Respondent: Smt.J.M.Jamuna Devi, Sr.DR
Section 143(3)Section 268A

capital gain of Rs.98.01 lakhs (AY 2012- 2013), was for the reason that the building had become old. Similarly, the land sold in AY 2015-2016, the second year under appeal, was for the reason that the assessee had not got a license fromGCDA to construct a commercial building thereon, placing on record a confirmation from the assessee to that

THE ACIT, CORP CIRCLE-1(2), KOCHI vs. M/S.KNOWELL REALTORS INDIA P. LTD, KOCHI

In the result, the Revenue’s appeals are allowed

ITA 192/COCH/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin25 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am &Shri Manomohan Das, Jm

For Appellant: Sri. Santosh P. Abraham, AdvFor Respondent: Smt.J.M.Jamuna Devi, Sr.DR
Section 143(3)Section 268A

capital gain of Rs.98.01 lakhs (AY 2012- 2013), was for the reason that the building had become old. Similarly, the land sold in AY 2015-2016, the second year under appeal, was for the reason that the assessee had not got a license fromGCDA to construct a commercial building thereon, placing on record a confirmation from the assessee to that

RUCHIT PARIMAL ASHAR,SANALA ROAD, MORBI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CALICUT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 505/COCH/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

150 of the factual paper book. It was clarified that although the name of Shri Muhammed Madni appeared as a shareholder, the actual investment was made on behalf of Shri Muhammed Abdul Gafoor and Shri Shameem, who are non-resident individuals and the brother and associate of Shri Muhammed Madni, respectively. The AR further emphasized that the actual ownership

RUCHIT PARIMAL ASHAR,SANALA ROAD, MORBI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRLCE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 506/COCH/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

150 of the factual paper book. It was clarified that although the name of Shri Muhammed Madni appeared as a shareholder, the actual investment was made on behalf of Shri Muhammed Abdul Gafoor and Shri Shameem, who are non-resident individuals and the brother and associate of Shri Muhammed Madni, respectively. The AR further emphasized that the actual ownership

ABC SALES CORPORATION,KASARAGOD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 439/COCH/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

150 of the factual paper book. It was clarified that although the name of Shri Muhammed Madni appeared as a shareholder, the actual investment was made on behalf of Shri Muhammed Abdul Gafoor and Shri Shameem, who are non-resident individuals and the brother and associate of Shri Muhammed Madni, respectively. The AR further emphasized that the actual ownership

K.ABDUL VAHEED,TALIPARAMBA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 504/COCH/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

150 of the factual paper book. It was clarified that although the name of Shri Muhammed Madni appeared as a shareholder, the actual investment was made on behalf of Shri Muhammed Abdul Gafoor and Shri Shameem, who are non-resident individuals and the brother and associate of Shri Muhammed Madni, respectively. The AR further emphasized that the actual ownership

KAKKOTTAKATH NADUVILAPURAYIL JUNAID,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 500/COCH/2024[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

150 of the factual paper book. It was clarified that although the name of Shri Muhammed Madni appeared as a shareholder, the actual investment was made on behalf of Shri Muhammed Abdul Gafoor and Shri Shameem, who are non-resident individuals and the brother and associate of Shri Muhammed Madni, respectively. The AR further emphasized that the actual ownership

A B C SALES CORPORATION ,KANNUR vs. ITO, CIRCLE-1, KANNUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 404/COCH/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

150 of the factual paper book. It was clarified that although the name of Shri Muhammed Madni appeared as a shareholder, the actual investment was made on behalf of Shri Muhammed Abdul Gafoor and Shri Shameem, who are non-resident individuals and the brother and associate of Shri Muhammed Madni, respectively. The AR further emphasized that the actual ownership

BATHX BATHWARE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,KOCHIN vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 436/COCH/2024[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

150 of the factual paper book. It was clarified that although the name of Shri Muhammed Madni appeared as a shareholder, the actual investment was made on behalf of Shri Muhammed Abdul Gafoor and Shri Shameem, who are non-resident individuals and the brother and associate of Shri Muhammed Madni, respectively. The AR further emphasized that the actual ownership

ABC BUILDWARES INDIA(P) LIMITED,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 454/COCH/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

150 of the factual paper book. It was clarified that although the name of Shri Muhammed Madni appeared as a shareholder, the actual investment was made on behalf of Shri Muhammed Abdul Gafoor and Shri Shameem, who are non-resident individuals and the brother and associate of Shri Muhammed Madni, respectively. The AR further emphasized that the actual ownership

ABC BUILDWARES(P) LIMITED,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1`, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 455/COCH/2024[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

150 of the factual paper book. It was clarified that although the name of Shri Muhammed Madni appeared as a shareholder, the actual investment was made on behalf of Shri Muhammed Abdul Gafoor and Shri Shameem, who are non-resident individuals and the brother and associate of Shri Muhammed Madni, respectively. The AR further emphasized that the actual ownership

ABC BUILDWAERS INDIA (P) LIMITED,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 456/COCH/2024[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

150 of the factual paper book. It was clarified that although the name of Shri Muhammed Madni appeared as a shareholder, the actual investment was made on behalf of Shri Muhammed Abdul Gafoor and Shri Shameem, who are non-resident individuals and the brother and associate of Shri Muhammed Madni, respectively. The AR further emphasized that the actual ownership

KAKKOTTAKATH NADUVILAPURAYIL JUNAID,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 497/COCH/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

150 of the factual paper book. It was clarified that although the name of Shri Muhammed Madni appeared as a shareholder, the actual investment was made on behalf of Shri Muhammed Abdul Gafoor and Shri Shameem, who are non-resident individuals and the brother and associate of Shri Muhammed Madni, respectively. The AR further emphasized that the actual ownership

BATHX BATHWARE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,COCHIN vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 438/COCH/2024[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2016-2017

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

150 of the factual paper book. It was clarified that although the name of Shri Muhammed Madni appeared as a shareholder, the actual investment was made on behalf of Shri Muhammed Abdul Gafoor and Shri Shameem, who are non-resident individuals and the brother and associate of Shri Muhammed Madni, respectively. The AR further emphasized that the actual ownership

ABC SALES CORPORATION,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 458/COCH/2024[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

150 of the factual paper book. It was clarified that although the name of Shri Muhammed Madni appeared as a shareholder, the actual investment was made on behalf of Shri Muhammed Abdul Gafoor and Shri Shameem, who are non-resident individuals and the brother and associate of Shri Muhammed Madni, respectively. The AR further emphasized that the actual ownership

KAKKOTTAKATH NADUVILAPURAYIL JUNAID,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 498/COCH/2024[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

150 of the factual paper book. It was clarified that although the name of Shri Muhammed Madni appeared as a shareholder, the actual investment was made on behalf of Shri Muhammed Abdul Gafoor and Shri Shameem, who are non-resident individuals and the brother and associate of Shri Muhammed Madni, respectively. The AR further emphasized that the actual ownership

KAKKOTTAKATH NADUVILAPURAYIL JUNAID,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 499/COCH/2024[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

150 of the factual paper book. It was clarified that although the name of Shri Muhammed Madni appeared as a shareholder, the actual investment was made on behalf of Shri Muhammed Abdul Gafoor and Shri Shameem, who are non-resident individuals and the brother and associate of Shri Muhammed Madni, respectively. The AR further emphasized that the actual ownership

ABC SALES CORPORATION,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 457/COCH/2024[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

150 of the factual paper book. It was clarified that although the name of Shri Muhammed Madni appeared as a shareholder, the actual investment was made on behalf of Shri Muhammed Abdul Gafoor and Shri Shameem, who are non-resident individuals and the brother and associate of Shri Muhammed Madni, respectively. The AR further emphasized that the actual ownership