Search: capital gains | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

189 results for “capital gains”+ Section 147clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,293 Delhi1,541 Chennai788 Ahmedabad651 Bangalore649 Jaipur560 Hyderabad461 Kolkata417 Pune331 Indore248 Chandigarh243 Surat224 Cochin189 Karnataka154 Visakhapatnam134 Raipur130 Rajkot114 Nagpur103 Amritsar66 Agra65 Lucknow65 Calcutta60 Panaji58 Guwahati57 Patna47 Jabalpur35 Jodhpur26 Cuttack23 Ranchi22 Dehradun21 SC20 Allahabad15 Telangana10 Varanasi8 Kerala4 Rajasthan3 Orissa2 Andhra Pradesh2 Punjab & Haryana1 K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1 Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 25076 Section 14A72 Section 143(3)57 Addition to Income30 Section 14726 Section 37(1)26 Section 14822 Disallowance20 Section 26319 Deduction

DCIT, ALAPPUZHA vs. M/S ACEELERATED FREEZE DRYING CO, LTD, ALAPPUZHA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is allowed and the appeal of the

ITA 714/COCH/2008[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin28 Jun 2019AY 2002-03

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 2Section 2(14)Section 42Section 50BSection 50B(1)

capital gain as provided under Section 50B of the Income Tax Act. The assessment was made by invoking powers under Section 147

ACEELERATED FREEZE DRYING CO.LTD,ALAPPUZHA vs. DCIT, ALAPPUZHA

Showing 1–20 of 189 · Page 1 of 10

...

14

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is allowed and the appeal of the

ITA 1286/COCH/2005[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin28 Jun 2019AY 2002-03

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 143(3)Section 2Section 2(14)Section 42Section 50BSection 50B(1)

capital gain as provided under Section 50B of the Income Tax Act. The assessment was made by invoking powers under Section 147

THE ITO, WARD-2, THODUPUZHA, THODUPUZHA vs. SRI.MARTIN JOHNY, KOTHAMANGALAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the appeals

ITA 354/COCH/2006[1999-2000]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 Jan 2019AY 1999-2000

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 2(24)(vi)Section 48

section 143(3) r. w. s 147 as full value of consideration in the computation of capital gains in respect

THE ACIT, CIR-1(1), ERNAKULAM, ERNAKULAM vs. SRI.JOSE MATHEW, M/S.E.V.MTHAI & SONS, KOTHAMANGALAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the appeals

ITA 450/COCH/2007[1999-2000]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 Jan 2019AY 1999-2000

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 2(24)(vi)Section 48

section 143(3) r. w. s 147 as full value of consideration in the computation of capital gains in respect

SRI.ESSA ISMAIL SAIT,ERNAKULAM vs. THE ACIT,CIR-2(1),, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the appeals

ITA 605/COCH/2005[1999-2000]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 Jan 2019AY 1999-2000

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 2(24)(vi)Section 48

section 143(3) r. w. s 147 as full value of consideration in the computation of capital gains in respect

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1), ERNAKULAM, ERNAKULAM vs. SRI.MATHAI XAVIER, KOTHAMANGALAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the appeals

ITA 451/COCH/2007[1999-2000]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 Jan 2019AY 1999-2000

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 2(24)(vi)Section 48

section 143(3) r. w. s 147 as full value of consideration in the computation of capital gains in respect

THE ITO, WD-2, THODUPUZHA, THODUPUZHA vs. SRI.E.J.SONY, KOTHAMANGALAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the appeals

ITA 355/COCH/2006[1999-2000]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 Jan 2019AY 1999-2000

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 2(24)(vi)Section 48

section 143(3) r. w. s 147 as full value of consideration in the computation of capital gains in respect

THE ITO, WD-2, THODUPUZHA, THODUPUZHA vs. SRI.TOMY MATHEW PARTNER OF MATHAI SONS, KOTHAMANGALAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the appeals

ITA 419/COCH/2007[1999-2000]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 Jan 2019AY 1999-2000

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 2(24)(vi)Section 48

section 143(3) r. w. s 147 as full value of consideration in the computation of capital gains in respect

THEACIT, CIR-1(1),EKM, ERNAKULAM vs. SRI.E.M.JOHNY, KOTHAMANGALAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the appeals

ITA 453/COCH/2007[1999-2000]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 Jan 2019AY 1999-2000

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 2(24)(vi)Section 48

section 143(3) r. w. s 147 as full value of consideration in the computation of capital gains in respect

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1), ERNAKULAM, ERNAKULAM vs. SRI.E.M.PAUL, EDAKATTUKUDIYIL, KOTHAMANGALAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the appeals

ITA 449/COCH/2007[1999-2000]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin17 Jan 2019AY 1999-2000

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 2(24)(vi)Section 48

section 143(3) r. w. s 147 as full value of consideration in the computation of capital gains in respect

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT,CEN- CIRCLE,, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 308/COCH/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

147 of the Act which was not pressed before us and hence, is dismissed as not pressed. Thus, this ground of appeals is dismissed. 10. The next common ground in ITA Nos. 208 & 211/Coch/2019 is with regard to treatment of amount received on sale of agricultural property vide registered sale deed as the amount received for relinquishment of trusteeship

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 28/COCH/2019[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

147 of the Act which was not pressed before us and hence, is dismissed as not pressed. Thus, this ground of appeals is dismissed. 10. The next common ground in ITA Nos. 208 & 211/Coch/2019 is with regard to treatment of amount received on sale of agricultural property vide registered sale deed as the amount received for relinquishment of trusteeship

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE ACIT,CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 213/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

147 of the Act which was not pressed before us and hence, is dismissed as not pressed. Thus, this ground of appeals is dismissed. 10. The next common ground in ITA Nos. 208 & 211/Coch/2019 is with regard to treatment of amount received on sale of agricultural property vide registered sale deed as the amount received for relinquishment of trusteeship

THE DCIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM vs. SMT.GRACY BABU, ADOOR P.O.

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 54/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

147 of the Act which was not pressed before us and hence, is dismissed as not pressed. Thus, this ground of appeals is dismissed. 10. The next common ground in ITA Nos. 208 & 211/Coch/2019 is with regard to treatment of amount received on sale of agricultural property vide registered sale deed as the amount received for relinquishment of trusteeship

THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM vs. SRI.JOSE THOMAS, ADOOR

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 55/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

147 of the Act which was not pressed before us and hence, is dismissed as not pressed. Thus, this ground of appeals is dismissed. 10. The next common ground in ITA Nos. 208 & 211/Coch/2019 is with regard to treatment of amount received on sale of agricultural property vide registered sale deed as the amount received for relinquishment of trusteeship

CARMEL EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. DCIT,CEN- CIRCLE,, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assesses in ITA no

ITA 310/COCH/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

147 of the Act which was not pressed before us and hence, is dismissed as not pressed. Thus, this ground of appeals is dismissed. 10. The next common ground in ITA Nos. 208 & 211/Coch/2019 is with regard to treatment of amount received on sale of agricultural property vide registered sale deed as the amount received for relinquishment of trusteeship

SMT.GRACY BABU,ADOOR P.O. vs. THE DCIT CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 35/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

147 of the Act which was not pressed before us and hence, is dismissed as not pressed. Thus, this ground of appeals is dismissed. 10. The next common ground in ITA Nos. 208 & 211/Coch/2019 is with regard to treatment of amount received on sale of agricultural property vide registered sale deed as the amount received for relinquishment of trusteeship

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 30/COCH/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

147 of the Act which was not pressed before us and hence, is dismissed as not pressed. Thus, this ground of appeals is dismissed. 10. The next common ground in ITA Nos. 208 & 211/Coch/2019 is with regard to treatment of amount received on sale of agricultural property vide registered sale deed as the amount received for relinquishment of trusteeship

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 31/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

147 of the Act which was not pressed before us and hence, is dismissed as not pressed. Thus, this ground of appeals is dismissed. 10. The next common ground in ITA Nos. 208 & 211/Coch/2019 is with regard to treatment of amount received on sale of agricultural property vide registered sale deed as the amount received for relinquishment of trusteeship

MRS.GRACY BABU,ADOOR P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessesin ITA no

ITA 210/COCH/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

147 of the Act which was not pressed before us and hence, is dismissed as not pressed. Thus, this ground of appeals is dismissed. 10. The next common ground in ITA Nos. 208 & 211/Coch/2019 is with regard to treatment of amount received on sale of agricultural property vide registered sale deed as the amount received for relinquishment of trusteeship