BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

94 results for “capital gains”+ Section 132(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai782Delhi652Jaipur229Hyderabad219Bangalore210Chennai208Ahmedabad185Chandigarh148Cochin94Kolkata79Nagpur75Pune59Indore56Rajkot50Raipur45Visakhapatnam36Ranchi34Guwahati30Lucknow25Surat25Dehradun17Amritsar15Jodhpur15Allahabad7Agra2Patna1Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 250114Section 143(3)39Section 153A39Section 13239Addition to Income23Section 153C22Search & Seizure20Reassessment16Section 14815

MRS.GRACY BABU,ADOOR P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 208/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin22 May 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Prakash Chand Yadav

For Appellant: Sri.Anil D.Nair, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri.Sundarasan S, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153C

132 of the Income Tax Act [hereinafter referred to as the "I.T. Act"] was conducted at the residence of the Sri Jose Thomas, Smt.Gracy Babu and Sri.P.J.Paulose on 04.03.2009 and certain documents were seized. An unsigned draft agreement dated 23.02.2009 was found which indicated that the amount envisaged for settlement of liability was Rs.43.50 crores and that the value

Showing 1–20 of 94 · Page 1 of 5

Cash Deposit15
Section 143(2)14
Section 139(4)7

MRS.GRACY BABU,ADOOR P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 209/COCH/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin22 May 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Prakash Chand Yadav

For Appellant: Sri.Anil D.Nair, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri.Sundarasan S, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153C

132 of the Income Tax Act [hereinafter referred to as the "I.T. Act"] was conducted at the residence of the Sri Jose Thomas, Smt.Gracy Babu and Sri.P.J.Paulose on 04.03.2009 and certain documents were seized. An unsigned draft agreement dated 23.02.2009 was found which indicated that the amount envisaged for settlement of liability was Rs.43.50 crores and that the value

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE ACIT,CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 212/COCH/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin22 May 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Prakash Chand Yadav

For Appellant: Sri.Anil D.Nair, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri.Sundarasan S, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153C

132 of the Income Tax Act [hereinafter referred to as the "I.T. Act"] was conducted at the residence of the Sri Jose Thomas, Smt.Gracy Babu and Sri.P.J.Paulose on 04.03.2009 and certain documents were seized. An unsigned draft agreement dated 23.02.2009 was found which indicated that the amount envisaged for settlement of liability was Rs.43.50 crores and that the value

MRS.REENA JOSE,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE DCIT, CEN-CIRCLE,, KOTTAYAM

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 207/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin22 May 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Prakash Chand Yadav

For Appellant: Sri.Anil D.Nair, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri.Sundarasan S, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153C

132 of the Income Tax Act [hereinafter referred to as the "I.T. Act"] was conducted at the residence of the Sri Jose Thomas, Smt.Gracy Babu and Sri.P.J.Paulose on 04.03.2009 and certain documents were seized. An unsigned draft agreement dated 23.02.2009 was found which indicated that the amount envisaged for settlement of liability was Rs.43.50 crores and that the value

SRI.JOSE THOMAS,ADOOR P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA vs. THE ACIT,CEN-CIRCLE, KOTTAYAM

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 211/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin22 May 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Prakash Chand Yadav

For Appellant: Sri.Anil D.Nair, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri.Sundarasan S, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153C

132 of the Income Tax Act [hereinafter referred to as the "I.T. Act"] was conducted at the residence of the Sri Jose Thomas, Smt.Gracy Babu and Sri.P.J.Paulose on 04.03.2009 and certain documents were seized. An unsigned draft agreement dated 23.02.2009 was found which indicated that the amount envisaged for settlement of liability was Rs.43.50 crores and that the value

RUCHIT PARIMAL ASHAR,SANALA ROAD, MORBI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CALICUT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 505/COCH/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

Section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act, without any incriminating material, cannot serve as a valid basis for making additions in the hands of the assessee. 19. On the other hand, the learned DR before us contended that the search operation conducted uncovered significant unexplained investments and undisclosed foreign assets held by the ABC Group. It was revealed that

BATHX BATHWARE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,COCHIN vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 438/COCH/2024[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2016-2017

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

Section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act, without any incriminating material, cannot serve as a valid basis for making additions in the hands of the assessee. 19. On the other hand, the learned DR before us contended that the search operation conducted uncovered significant unexplained investments and undisclosed foreign assets held by the ABC Group. It was revealed that

KAKKOTTAKATH NADUVILAPURAYIL JUNAID,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 499/COCH/2024[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

Section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act, without any incriminating material, cannot serve as a valid basis for making additions in the hands of the assessee. 19. On the other hand, the learned DR before us contended that the search operation conducted uncovered significant unexplained investments and undisclosed foreign assets held by the ABC Group. It was revealed that

KAKKOTTAKATH NADUVILAPURAYIL JUNAID,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 498/COCH/2024[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

Section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act, without any incriminating material, cannot serve as a valid basis for making additions in the hands of the assessee. 19. On the other hand, the learned DR before us contended that the search operation conducted uncovered significant unexplained investments and undisclosed foreign assets held by the ABC Group. It was revealed that

K.ABDUL VAHEED,TALIPARAMBA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 503/COCH/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

Section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act, without any incriminating material, cannot serve as a valid basis for making additions in the hands of the assessee. 19. On the other hand, the learned DR before us contended that the search operation conducted uncovered significant unexplained investments and undisclosed foreign assets held by the ABC Group. It was revealed that

K.ABDUL VAHEED,TALIPARAMBA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 504/COCH/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

Section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act, without any incriminating material, cannot serve as a valid basis for making additions in the hands of the assessee. 19. On the other hand, the learned DR before us contended that the search operation conducted uncovered significant unexplained investments and undisclosed foreign assets held by the ABC Group. It was revealed that

A B C SALES CORPORATION ,KANNUR vs. ITO, CIRCLE-1, KANNUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 404/COCH/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

Section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act, without any incriminating material, cannot serve as a valid basis for making additions in the hands of the assessee. 19. On the other hand, the learned DR before us contended that the search operation conducted uncovered significant unexplained investments and undisclosed foreign assets held by the ABC Group. It was revealed that

BATHX BATHWARE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,KOCHIN vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 436/COCH/2024[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

Section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act, without any incriminating material, cannot serve as a valid basis for making additions in the hands of the assessee. 19. On the other hand, the learned DR before us contended that the search operation conducted uncovered significant unexplained investments and undisclosed foreign assets held by the ABC Group. It was revealed that

ABC BUILDWARES INDIA(P) LIMITED,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 454/COCH/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

Section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act, without any incriminating material, cannot serve as a valid basis for making additions in the hands of the assessee. 19. On the other hand, the learned DR before us contended that the search operation conducted uncovered significant unexplained investments and undisclosed foreign assets held by the ABC Group. It was revealed that

KAKKOTTAKATH NADUVILAPURAYIL JUNAID,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 500/COCH/2024[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

Section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act, without any incriminating material, cannot serve as a valid basis for making additions in the hands of the assessee. 19. On the other hand, the learned DR before us contended that the search operation conducted uncovered significant unexplained investments and undisclosed foreign assets held by the ABC Group. It was revealed that

ABC SALES CORPORATION,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 458/COCH/2024[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

Section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act, without any incriminating material, cannot serve as a valid basis for making additions in the hands of the assessee. 19. On the other hand, the learned DR before us contended that the search operation conducted uncovered significant unexplained investments and undisclosed foreign assets held by the ABC Group. It was revealed that

ABC SALES CORPORATION,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 457/COCH/2024[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

Section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act, without any incriminating material, cannot serve as a valid basis for making additions in the hands of the assessee. 19. On the other hand, the learned DR before us contended that the search operation conducted uncovered significant unexplained investments and undisclosed foreign assets held by the ABC Group. It was revealed that

ABC SALES CORPORATION,KASARAGOD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 439/COCH/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

Section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act, without any incriminating material, cannot serve as a valid basis for making additions in the hands of the assessee. 19. On the other hand, the learned DR before us contended that the search operation conducted uncovered significant unexplained investments and undisclosed foreign assets held by the ABC Group. It was revealed that

KAKKOTTAKATH NADUVILAPURAYIL JUNAID,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 497/COCH/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

Section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act, without any incriminating material, cannot serve as a valid basis for making additions in the hands of the assessee. 19. On the other hand, the learned DR before us contended that the search operation conducted uncovered significant unexplained investments and undisclosed foreign assets held by the ABC Group. It was revealed that

ABC BUILDWAERS INDIA (P) LIMITED,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 456/COCH/2024[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

Section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act, without any incriminating material, cannot serve as a valid basis for making additions in the hands of the assessee. 19. On the other hand, the learned DR before us contended that the search operation conducted uncovered significant unexplained investments and undisclosed foreign assets held by the ABC Group. It was revealed that