BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “capital gains”+ Revision u/s 263clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai279Delhi238Chennai139Jaipur85Bangalore80Indore73Kolkata61Chandigarh60Ahmedabad59Rajkot40Raipur34Surat34Panaji33Hyderabad32Visakhapatnam24Pune21Nagpur17Lucknow15Cuttack11Dehradun9Agra7Patna7Cochin7Amritsar7Jodhpur6Ranchi4Jabalpur3Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 26311Section 143(3)4Section 54B4Section 263(1)4Section 1473Capital Gains3Revision u/s 2633Survey u/s 133A3Limitation/Time-bar3Section 133A

PALLATHUKADAVIL IBRAHIMKUTTY ABDUL KABEER,ERNAKULAM vs. THE PCIT KOCHI-1, KOCHI

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is partly allowed on the above terms, and his SA dismissed

ITA 428/COCH/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Accountantmemberand Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Judicialmember & Sa No. 78/Coch/2023 (Assessment Year: 2018-19) Pallathukadavil Ibrahimkutty Principal Cit – 1 Abdul Kabeer C.R. Building, I.S. Press Road 71, Pallathukadavil Vs. Kochi 682018 Kanjoor P.O., Ernakulam 682575 [Pan: Aaopi0584P] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Padmanathan K.V., AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 263(1)Section 54B

revision of his assessment under section 143(3) read with sections 143(3A) and 143(3B) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) dated 15.03.2021 for Assessment Year (AY) 2018-19 by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (Pr.CIT) vide his order u/s. 263 of the Act dated 29.03.2023. The assessee has also filed a Stay Petition

2
Section 1482
Deduction2

STERLING FARM RESEARCH AND SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,ERNAKULAM vs. THE PCIT, KOCHI-1, KOCHI

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 661/COCH/2022[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin09 Feb 2024AY 2016-2017

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora & Shri Manomohan Dassterling Farm Research & Services Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 Pvt. Ltd. Kochi 29/2469 C2, Sterling House Vs. Pettah, Poonithura S.O. Ernakulam 682038 [Pan:Aadcs3199J] (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Raja Kannan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT-DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 50Section 50B

revision of it’s assessment under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act), dated 20.12.2018 for Assessment Year (AY) 2016-17, vide order u/s. 263 dated 24.11.2020. 2. The appeal, filed on 30.05.2022, is within time, i.e., in view of exclusion of the period from 15.03.2020 to 28.02.2022 for the purpose of reckoning limitation

DCIT CIRCLE 1(1) & TPS, THRISSUR, THRISSUR vs. KONUPARAMBAN OUSEPH ITTOOP, POTTA CHALAKKUDY

In the result appeal filed by the Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 257/COCH/2025[2013]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin15 Jul 2025

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Sonjoy Sarma, Jm Assessment Year:2013-14 Konuparamban Ouseph Ittoop .......... Appellant Potta, Thrissur – 680722. Pan: Aacpi9545G Vs. Dcit .......... Respondent Thrissur. Assessment Year:2013-14

For Appellant: Shri Sathish John Kanichai, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 263

revised on 31/03/2015 admitting a total income of Rs. 1,29,09,320/-. Against the said return of income, the assessment was completed by the AO on 29/03/2016 at a total income of Rs. 1,79,09,320/-. The said assessment order attained finality as the appeal filed before the CIT(A) was dismissed as not pressed. 4. Subsequently

LAKSHMI S ALIAS LAKSHMI HARIGOVIND,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1(2), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 611/COCH/2022[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin03 Feb 2023AY 2012-2013

Bench: S/Shri Sanjay Arora & Sandeepgosain

For Appellant: Shri Anil D. Nair, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 263Section 263(1)

capital gains was assessable for AY 2009-10. The revision for the current year is, thus, misplaced. 3.2 Smt. Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, the Sr. DR, would draw our attention to section 263(1) of the Act, stating that no appellate order had admittedly been passed even till date, for the assessee to plead exclusion on that basis

MUTHOOT INSURANCE BROKERS (P) LTD,COCHIN vs. DCIT, CORP. CIR-1(1), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 377/COCH/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Jun 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm Assessment Year: 2020-21 Muthoot Insurance Brokers (P) Ltd. .......... Appellant 3Rd Floor, Kurian Towers, Banerji Road Cochin 682018 [Pan: Aabce1076A] Vs. Dcit, Corporate Circle-1(1), Kochi .......... Respondent Appellant By: Shri Thomson Thomas, Ca Respondent By: Shri Suresh Sivanandan, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 04.06.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 13.06.2025

For Appellant: Shri Thomson Thomas, CAFor Respondent: Shri Suresh Sivanandan, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 36A

u/s 263 of the Act in case the assessment order passed is erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of revenue. In order to 5 Muthoot Insurance Brokers (P) Ltd. invoke the power of revision, the above two conditions are required to be satisfied cumulatively. References in this regard can be made to the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court

GOOD HOMES PVT LTD,KOCHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), KOCHI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 884/COCH/2022[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin11 Aug 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am &Shriabyt.Varkey, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.A.Gopalakrishnan, CAFor Respondent: Smt.J.M.Jamuna Devi, Sr.AR
Section 133ASection 147Section 148

263 -- 4. Capvest 100.5 12,280.84 12,34,225 -- 1,50,42,408 -- 1,62,76,633 Wealth Management Services Pvt.Ltd. 5. Elton 48.5 12,280.84 5,95,621 -- 1,22,33,746 -- 1,28,29,367 Technologies Pvt.Ltd. 6 Jeeva 3 12,280.84 36,843 27,43,255 -- 27,06,412 -- Vacation Resorts Pvt.Ltd. Total

AJIT ASSOCIATES PRIVATE LIMITED,ERNAKULAM vs. JCIT, CORPORATE RANGE - 1, KOCHI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 870/COCH/2022[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin11 Aug 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Am &Shriabyt.Varkey, Jm

For Appellant: Sri.A.Gopalakrishnan, CAFor Respondent: Smt.J.M.Jamuna Devi, Sr.AR
Section 133ASection 147Section 148

263 -- 4. Capvest 100.5 12,280.84 12,34,225 -- 1,50,42,408 -- 1,62,76,633 Wealth Management Services Pvt.Ltd. 5. Elton 48.5 12,280.84 5,95,621 -- 1,22,33,746 -- 1,28,29,367 Technologies Pvt.Ltd. 6 Jeeva 3 12,280.84 36,843 27,43,255 -- 27,06,412 -- Vacation Resorts Pvt.Ltd. Total