INDITRADE BUSINESS CONSULTANTS LIMITED,ERNAKULAM vs. DCIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), KOCHI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

bogus purchases, and accordingly amount of INR 3,34,87,077 was treated as an unexplained expenditure under section 69C of the Act. 6. The learned CIT(A), vide impugned order, dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee and upheld the addition made by the AO. Being aggrieved, the assessee is in appeal before us. 7

YENKEY ROLLER FLOUR MILLS,CALICUT vs. DCIT C-1(1), KOZHIKKODE

In the result, the appeal filed by the appellant stands allowed