BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

64 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 14clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai3,519Delhi2,171Kolkata642Jaipur544Ahmedabad438Chennai418Surat374Bangalore308Pune273Chandigarh222Hyderabad210Indore179Raipur133Karnataka124Amritsar107Nagpur101Rajkot99Visakhapatnam71Cochin64Lucknow62Cuttack60Guwahati53Calcutta47Agra40Jodhpur38Allahabad35Patna23Ranchi20Telangana15Jabalpur9Dehradun9Varanasi7SC6Panaji5Orissa2Gauhati2ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Section 250114Section 80I12Addition to Income7Section 801B6Bogus Purchases3Disallowance3Section 1322Section 153A2Section 143(2)2

SRI.C.SHAJI,TRIVANDRUM vs. THE ITO, WARD-2(1), TRIVNDRUM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 505/COCH/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Sept 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Dr.Pradeep K.P., AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt.A.S.Bindhu, Sr.DR

bogus 6 Sri.C.Shaji. purchases. Accordingly, this ground raised by the assessee is dismissed. 9. The next issue for our consideration reads as follow:- “The disallowance of Rs.2,81,63,141/- as cash purchase in excess of Rs.20,000/- citing the provisions of Section 40A(3) is highly unreasonable and against law. As per Section

SRI.NAVA M.MEERAN,ADIMALY vs. THE ACIT, ERNAKULAM, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical

ITA 325/COCH/2017[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin

Showing 1–20 of 64 · Page 1 of 4

Section 143(3)2
Section 692
Deduction2
01 Mar 2019
AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 69Section 801BSection 80I

bogus purchases made by the assessee out of undisclosed sources. 7. The facts of the case are that the Assessing Officer made addition u/s. 69 of the Act of the differentials between the amounts being expenses debited in the I.T.A. Nos.325&326/Coch/2017 books of accounts and the amounts substantively supported by invoices, which amounts relate to the transactions carried

SRI.NAVAS M.MEERAN,ADIMALY vs. THE DCIT, ERNAKULAM, ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical

ITA 326/COCH/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin01 Mar 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 69Section 801BSection 80I

bogus purchases made by the assessee out of undisclosed sources. 7. The facts of the case are that the Assessing Officer made addition u/s. 69 of the Act of the differentials between the amounts being expenses debited in the I.T.A. Nos.325&326/Coch/2017 books of accounts and the amounts substantively supported by invoices, which amounts relate to the transactions carried

M/S.PRINCE ROLLER FLOUR MILLS P. LTD,PALAKKAD vs. THE ACIT, KOCHI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeals of the

ITA 36/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 143(2)Section 153A

bogus. Please explain in detail. 37 I.T.A. Nos. 36 to 41/Coch/2019 & ITA Nos. 21 to 26/Coch/2019 (A) The Sales and Purchase of wheat with Sri. P. K. Kunjumoideen is recorded in the books of accounts and the supporting sales bills and purchased invoice are maintained. But in reality there is no sales made to Sri. P. K Kunjumoideen. Instead

THE ACIT, KOCHI vs. M/S.PRINCE ROLLER FLOUR MILLS P. LTD, PALAKKAD

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed and the appeals of the

ITA 21/COCH/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin16 Dec 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am&George George K., Jm

Section 132Section 143(2)Section 153A

bogus. Please explain in detail. 37 I.T.A. Nos. 36 to 41/Coch/2019 & ITA Nos. 21 to 26/Coch/2019 (A) The Sales and Purchase of wheat with Sri. P. K. Kunjumoideen is recorded in the books of accounts and the supporting sales bills and purchased invoice are maintained. But in reality there is no sales made to Sri. P. K Kunjumoideen. Instead

ELIZABETH JOSE,ERNAKULAM vs. DCIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), ERNAKULAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands dismissed

ITA 522/COCH/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin11 Aug 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am Assessment Year: 2016-17 Elizbeth Jose .......... Appellant Choice House, P.V. Sreedharan Road Kumbalam, Ernakulam 682506 [Pan: Acfpj2569J] Vs. Dcit, Corporate Circle - 1(1), Kochi .......... Respondent Assessee By: ------- None ------- Revenue By: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing: 06.08.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 11.08.2025 O R D E R This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [Cit(A)] Dated 12.06.2025 For Assessment Year (Ay) 2016-17. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Appellant Is An Individual. The Return Of Income For Ay 2016-17 Was Filed On 03.08 Disclosing Total Income Of Rs. 14,71,400/- & Unabsorbed Short Term Capital Loss Of Rs. 35,89,251/-. Against The Said Return Of Income, The Assessment Was Completed By The National Faceless Assessment Centre (Hereinafter Called "The Ao") Vide Order Dated 18.12.2018 Passed U/S. 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (The Act) Accepting

For Appellant: ------- None -------For Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 2(47)

14,71,400/- and unabsorbed short term capital loss of Rs. 35,89,251/-. Against the said return of income, the assessment was completed by the National Faceless assessment Centre (hereinafter called "the AO") vide order dated 18.12.2018 passed u/s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) accepting 2 Elizbeth Jose the returned income. Subsequently

ABC BUILDWARES(P) LIMITED,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1`, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 455/COCH/2024[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

14 of its appeal are general in nature and do not require any separate adjudication. Accordingly, the same are hereby dismissed as infructuous. 47. The issue raised by the assessee vide ground No. 8 of its appeal is that the learned CIT(A) erred in confirming the addition of Rs. 3,25,84,113/- on account of suppressed sales

ABC BUILDWARES INDIA(P) LIMITED,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 454/COCH/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

14 of its appeal are general in nature and do not require any separate adjudication. Accordingly, the same are hereby dismissed as infructuous. 47. The issue raised by the assessee vide ground No. 8 of its appeal is that the learned CIT(A) erred in confirming the addition of Rs. 3,25,84,113/- on account of suppressed sales

RUCHIT PARIMAL ASHAR,SANALA ROAD, MORBI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CALICUT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 505/COCH/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

14 of its appeal are general in nature and do not require any separate adjudication. Accordingly, the same are hereby dismissed as infructuous. 47. The issue raised by the assessee vide ground No. 8 of its appeal is that the learned CIT(A) erred in confirming the addition of Rs. 3,25,84,113/- on account of suppressed sales

KAKKOTTAKATH NADUVILAPURAYIL JUNAID,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 499/COCH/2024[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

14 of its appeal are general in nature and do not require any separate adjudication. Accordingly, the same are hereby dismissed as infructuous. 47. The issue raised by the assessee vide ground No. 8 of its appeal is that the learned CIT(A) erred in confirming the addition of Rs. 3,25,84,113/- on account of suppressed sales

K.ABDUL VAHEED,TALIPARAMBA vs. ACIT(CENTRAL CIRCLE-1), KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 501/COCH/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

14 of its appeal are general in nature and do not require any separate adjudication. Accordingly, the same are hereby dismissed as infructuous. 47. The issue raised by the assessee vide ground No. 8 of its appeal is that the learned CIT(A) erred in confirming the addition of Rs. 3,25,84,113/- on account of suppressed sales

KAKKOTTAKATH NADUVILAPURAYIL JUNAID,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 497/COCH/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

14 of its appeal are general in nature and do not require any separate adjudication. Accordingly, the same are hereby dismissed as infructuous. 47. The issue raised by the assessee vide ground No. 8 of its appeal is that the learned CIT(A) erred in confirming the addition of Rs. 3,25,84,113/- on account of suppressed sales

KAKKOTTAKATH NADUVILAPURAYIL JUNAID,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 498/COCH/2024[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

14 of its appeal are general in nature and do not require any separate adjudication. Accordingly, the same are hereby dismissed as infructuous. 47. The issue raised by the assessee vide ground No. 8 of its appeal is that the learned CIT(A) erred in confirming the addition of Rs. 3,25,84,113/- on account of suppressed sales

KAKKOTTAKATH NADUVILAPURAYIL JUNAID,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 500/COCH/2024[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

14 of its appeal are general in nature and do not require any separate adjudication. Accordingly, the same are hereby dismissed as infructuous. 47. The issue raised by the assessee vide ground No. 8 of its appeal is that the learned CIT(A) erred in confirming the addition of Rs. 3,25,84,113/- on account of suppressed sales

K.ABDUL VAHEED,TALIPARAMBA vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, , KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 502/COCH/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

14 of its appeal are general in nature and do not require any separate adjudication. Accordingly, the same are hereby dismissed as infructuous. 47. The issue raised by the assessee vide ground No. 8 of its appeal is that the learned CIT(A) erred in confirming the addition of Rs. 3,25,84,113/- on account of suppressed sales

A B C SALES CORPORATION ,KANNUR vs. ITO, CIRCLE-1, KANNUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 404/COCH/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

14 of its appeal are general in nature and do not require any separate adjudication. Accordingly, the same are hereby dismissed as infructuous. 47. The issue raised by the assessee vide ground No. 8 of its appeal is that the learned CIT(A) erred in confirming the addition of Rs. 3,25,84,113/- on account of suppressed sales

KODIYIL MUHAMMED MADANI, PARTNER(ABC SALAES CORPORATION),TALIPARAMBA vs. ACIT , CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 523/COCH/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

14 of its appeal are general in nature and do not require any separate adjudication. Accordingly, the same are hereby dismissed as infructuous. 47. The issue raised by the assessee vide ground No. 8 of its appeal is that the learned CIT(A) erred in confirming the addition of Rs. 3,25,84,113/- on account of suppressed sales

KODIYIL MUHAMMED MADANI, PARTNER (ABC SALES CORPORATION),TALIPARAMBA vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CALICUT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 524/COCH/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

14 of its appeal are general in nature and do not require any separate adjudication. Accordingly, the same are hereby dismissed as infructuous. 47. The issue raised by the assessee vide ground No. 8 of its appeal is that the learned CIT(A) erred in confirming the addition of Rs. 3,25,84,113/- on account of suppressed sales

KODIYIL MUHAMMED MADANI PARTNER, ABC SALES CORPORATION,TALIPARAMBA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 836/COCH/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

14 of its appeal are general in nature and do not require any separate adjudication. Accordingly, the same are hereby dismissed as infructuous. 47. The issue raised by the assessee vide ground No. 8 of its appeal is that the learned CIT(A) erred in confirming the addition of Rs. 3,25,84,113/- on account of suppressed sales

ABC SALES CORPORATION,KANNUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, KOZHIKODE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 457/COCH/2024[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin20 Dec 2024AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K

Section 250

14 of its appeal are general in nature and do not require any separate adjudication. Accordingly, the same are hereby dismissed as infructuous. 47. The issue raised by the assessee vide ground No. 8 of its appeal is that the learned CIT(A) erred in confirming the addition of Rs. 3,25,84,113/- on account of suppressed sales